ASTM F75 implants distort due to residual stress released after finishing machining operations, causing implants to fail quality requirements. Previous work has shown that a shot blasting cleaning process could be the source of this distortion. Finite element analysis (FEA) is conducted to predict stress and Almen strip arc heights for experimental comparison. 2D and 3D single impact models and 3D multiple impact models are created. 3D multiple impact models with plastically deforming shot are shown to accurately predict the stress state and distortion. For shot with hardness similar to the implants, distortion creating stress magnitudes are induced, with the greatest fluctuations in stress coming from shot velocity. The depth of the predicted compressive stress layer ranges from 0.23 to 0.6 mm.
ConroyBTraoréYPaddeaSApplication of multiple residual stress determination methods to coarse-grained biomedical implant castings. Mater Sci Technol. 2017; 33:1231–1251.
2.
TannerDConroyB. Adaptation of the Almen-strip test method to investigate femoral knee implant distortion. 33rd International Manufacturing Conference (IMC33). Limerick: University of Limerick; 2016.
3.
ConroyBTannerD.Determination of residual stress within complex-shaped coarse-grained cobalt-chromium biomedical castings. Mater Sci Technol. 2016; 32:1411–1426.
4.
InacioMCSPaxtonEWGravesSEProjected increase in total knee arthroplasty in the United States – an alternative projection model. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2017; 25:1797–1803.
HammondDWMeguidSA.Crack propagation in the presence of shot-peening residual stresses. Eng Fract Mech. 1990; 37:373–387.
7.
KirkD.Shot peening. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol Int J.1999; 71:349–361.
8.
ASTM. ASTM F75: Standard specification for cobalt-28 chromium-6 molybdenum alloy casting and casting ally for surgical implants. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2012.
9.
EdwardAHeynsPKokS.A numerical investigation of a single-shot in a DEM-FEM approach to shot peening simulation. Metals. 2019; 11:1183.
10.
FrijaMHassineTFathallahRFinite element modelling of shot peening process: prediction of the compressive residual stresses, the plastic deformations and the surface integrity. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006; 426:173–180.
11.
KirkD.Back to basics: shot velocity. Shot Peen. 2020; 34:28–36.
12.
SunJZhangY. Three-dimensional finite element simulation of residual stress field for shot-peening and grinding. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Electromechanical Control Technology and Transportation. Zhuhai City, Guangdong Province, China: Atlantis Press; 2015. p. 382–386.
13.
SchiffnerKHellingCDg.Simulation of residual stresses by shot peening. Comput Struct. 1999; 72:329–340.
14.
SoadyKA.Life assessment methodologies incorporating shot peening process effects: mechanistic consideration of residual stresses and strain hardening part 1-effect of shot peening on fatigue resistance. Mater Sci Technol. 2013; 29:637–651.
15.
GuaglianoM.Relating Almen intensity to residual stresses induced by shot peening: a numerical approach. J Mater Process Technol. 2001; 110:277–286.
16.
TannerDConroyB. Determination of residual stress within ASTM F75 femoral knee implants. BSSM's 11th International Conference on Advances in Experimental Mechanics, Exeter. 2016.
17.
MeoMVignjevicR.Finite element analysis of residual stress induced by shot peening process. Adv Eng Softw. 2003; 34:569–575.
18.
RouhaudEOuakkaAOuldC Finite elements model of shot peening effects of constitutive laws of the material. Proceedings of ICSP-9, Paris, 2005.
19.
KimTLeeHHyunHCA simple but effective Fe model with plastic shot for evaluation of peening residual stress and its experimental validation. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011; 528:5945–5954.
20.
MeguidSShagalGStranartJThree-dimensional dynamic finite element analysis of shot-peening induced residual stresses. Finite Elem Anal Des. 1999; 31:179–191.
21.
MeguidSShagalGStranartJ.3D Fe analysis of peening of strain-rate sensitive materials using multiple impingement model. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2002; 27:119–134.
22.
MajzoobiGAziziRAlavi NiaA.A three-dimensional simulation of shot peening process using multiple shot impacts. J Mater Proces Technol. 2005; 164–165:1226–1234.
23.
ShivpuriRChengXMaoY.Elasto-plastic pseudo-dynamic numerical model for the design of shot peening process parameters. Mater Des2009; 30:3112–3120.
24.
MiaoHLaroseSPerronCOn the potential applications of a 3D random finite element model for the simulation of shot peening. Adv Eng Softw. 2009; 40:1023–1038.
25.
HuDGaoYMengFA unifying approach in simulating the shot peening process using a 3D random representative volume finite element model. Chin J Aeronaut. 2017; 30:1592–1602.
26.
YangZLeeYHeSAnalysis of the influence of high peening coverage on Almen intensity and residual compressive stress. Appl Sci. 2019; 10:105.
27.
ChenZYangFMeguidSA.Realistic finite element simulations of Arc-height development in shot-peened Almen strips. ASME J Eng Mater Technol. 2014; 136:041002.
28.
ZhangJLuSZhouZ.Modeling of multiple shots for analyzing shot peening controlled parameters on formed curvature radius. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2017; 93:1867–1876.
29.
JohnsonGRCookWH.Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech. 1985; 21:31–48.
30.
SipeiCLiuJPanZExperimental study on failure mechanisms of sandwich panels with multi-layered aluminum foam/UHMWPE laminate core under combined blast and fragments loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020; 59:107227.
31.
SanjurjoPRodríguezCPeñuelasINumerical simulation of shot peening process: influence of the constitutive model of the target material. Surf Coat Technol. 2014; 258:822–831.
32.
WuGWangZGanJFe analysis of shot-peening-induced residual stresses of Aisi 304 stainless steel by considering mesh density and friction coefficient. Surf Eng. 2019; 35:242–254.
33.
KirkD.Quantification of shot peening intensity rating. Shot Peen. 2015; 29:24–32.
34.
BrazelE. Power and position-oriented process monitoring of freeform abrasive machining [PhD thesis]. Dublin: Trinity College, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering; 2013.
