This paper presents an investigation of the influence of strain rate on the functional behaviour of TiNi alloy. Specimens were deformed in compression and tension modes using the Kolsky method for a split Hopkinson pressure bar, and its modification in martensitic, austenitic, and pre-martensitic states at 500, 1000, and 1500 s−1 strain rates. One-way shape memory and two-way shape memory (TWSM) effects were measured and compared with ones after quasi-static deformation. With an increase in the strain rate, the one-way shape memory effect decreased, but the TWSM effect increased. Functional behaviour indirectly demonstrated the sensitivity of the martensite reorientation and the formation of stress-induced martensite to strain rate. Strain rate sensitivity led to differences in the shape recovery curves during thermocycling.
JaniJMLearyMSubicAA review of shape memory alloy research, applications, and opportunities. Mater Des. 2014; 56(4):1078–1113.
2.
CastellanoMGIndirliMMartelliA.Progress of application, research and development and design guidelines for shape memory alloy devices for cultural heritage structures in Italy. Proc SPIE. 2001; 4330:250–261.
3.
WilsonJWesolowskyM.Shape memory alloys for seismic response modification: a state-of-the-art review. Earthq Spectra. 2005; 21(2):569–601.
4.
YahiaL.Shape memory implants. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag; 2000.
5.
PetriniLMigliavaccaF.Biomedical applications of shape memory alloys. J Metall. 2011; 2011:501483.
6.
KhmelevskayaIRyklinaEKorotitskiyA.Application of thermo-mechanically treated TiNi SMA. In: ResninaNRubanikN, editor. Shape memory alloys: properties, technologies, opportunities. Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications Ltd; 2015. p. 603–637.
7.
RazovACherniavskyA.Application of SMAs in modern spacecraft and devices. J Phys IV. 2003; 112(10):1173–1176.
8.
HartlDJLagoudasDC.Aerospace applications of shape memory alloys. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G: J Aerosp Eng. 2007; 221(4):535–552.
9.
OstropikoESRazovAI.Functional properties of TiNi conical working elements in the holding and release device. Cybern Phys. 2018; 7(4):216–219.
10.
LinPTobushiHTanakaKInfluence of strain rate on deformation properties of TiNi shape memory alloy. JSME Int J A. 1996; 39(1):117–123.
11.
LiuYLiYRameshKT.High strain rate deformation of martensitic NiTi shape memory alloy. Scr Mater. 1999; 41(1):89–95.
12.
LiuYLiYHieZDynamic deformation of shape-memory alloys: evidence of domino detwinning?Phil Mag Lett. 2002; 82(9):511–517.
13.
LiuYLiYRameshKT.Rate dependence of deformation mechanisms in a shape memory alloy. Phil Mag A. 2002; 82(12):2461–2473.
14.
BelyaevSPetrovARazovAMechanical properties of titanium nickelide at high strain rate loading. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004; 378:122–124.
15.
Nemat-NasserSChoiJYGuoWGVery high strain-rate response of a NiTi shape-memory alloy. Mech Mater. 2005; 37:287–298.
16.
Nemat-NasserSChoiJY.Strain rate dependence of deformation mechanisms in a Ni–Ti–Cr shape-memory alloy. Acta Mater. 2005; 53:449–454.
17.
AdharapurapuRRJiangFVecchioKSResponse of NiTi shape memory alloy at high strain rate: a systematic investigation of temperature effects on tension–compression asymmetry. Acta Mater. 2006; 54:4609–4620.
18.
Nemat-NasserSChoiJY.Thermomechanical response of an Ni-Ti-Cr shape-memory alloy at low and high strain rates. Philos Mag. 2006; 86(9):1173–1187.
19.
QiuYYoungMLNieX.Influence of dynamic compression on phase transformation of martensitic NiTi shape memory alloys. Metall Mater Trans. 2015; 46(10):4661–4668.
20.
GruzdkovAKrivosheevSYuPMartensitic inelasticity of TiNi-shape memory alloy under pulsed loading. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008; 481–482:105–108.
21.
ChenWWWuQKangJHCompressive super-elastic behavior of a NiTi shape memory alloy at strain rates of 0.001-750 s−1. Int J Solids Struct. 2001; 38:8989–8998.
22.
Nemat-NasserSGuoWG.Super-elastic and cyclic response of NiTi SMA at various strain rates and temperatures. Mech Mater. 2006; 38:463–474.
23.
TobushiHShimenoYHachisukaTInfluence of strain rate on super-elastic properties of TiNi shape memory alloy. Mech Mater. 1998; 30:141–150.
24.
ZurbituJSantamartaRPicornellCImpact fatigue behaviour of super-elastic NiTi shape memory alloy wires. Mater Sci Eng A. 2010; 528(2):764–769.
25.
QiuYYoungMLNieX.High strain rate compression of martensitic NiTi shape memory alloy at different temperatures. Metall Mater Trans A. 2017; 48:601–608.
26.
ElibolCWagnerMF-X.Strain rate effects on the localisation of the stress-induced martensitic transformation in pseudo-elastic NiTi under uniaxial tension, compression, and compression–shear. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015; 643:194–202.
27.
EvardMMotorinARazovAMicrostructural modelling of TiNi alloy high strain rate tension. Mater Today: Proc. 2017; 4(3):4637–4641.
28.
YuHYoungML.Three-dimensional modelling for deformation of austenitic NiTi shape memory alloys under high strain rate. Smart Mater Struct. 2018; 27(1):015031.
29.
LikhachevVAYuIP.Эффект памяти формы в никелиде титана поcле cтатичеcкого и ударного деформирования [Shape memory effect in titanium nickelide after static and impact deformation]. Proccedings of XXIV conference “Actual problems of strength” devoted to “Strength of materials with new functional properties”; 1990 Dec 17-21; Rubizhne, USSR;1990. p. 128–129. Russian.
30.
ShiS-QChenJ-YDongX-LStudy on shape memory effect of TiNi alloy after impact deformation. Explos Shock Waves. 2001; 21(3):168–172.
31.
BelyaevSPMorozovNFRazovAIShape memory effect in titanium-nickel after preliminary dynamic deformation. Mater Sci Forum. 2002; 394–395:337–340.
32.
BragovAGalievaAGrigorievaVFunctional properties of TiNi shape memory alloy after high strain rate loading. Mater Sci Forum. 2013; 738–739:326–331.
33.
BragovADanilovAKonstantinovAStraining of metastable austenite as a way to improve NiTi alloy functional properties. Mater Today Proc. 2015; 2(3):S961–S964.
34.
ChandraKPurdyGR.Observations of thin crystals of TiNi in pre-martensitic states. J Appl Phys. 1968; 39(5):2176–2181.
35.
SandrockGDPerkinsAJHehemannRF.The pre-martensitic instability in near-equiatomic TiNi. Metall Trans. 1971; 2(10):2769–2781.
36.
MoinePMichalGMSinclairR.A morphological study of “Pre-martensitic” effects in TiNi. Acta Metall. 1982; 30(1):109–123.
37.
TietzeHMilnerMRenkerB.Dynamical properties of pre-martensitic NiTi. J Phys C Solid State Phys. 1984; 17(21):L529–L532.
38.
KolskyH.An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading. Proc Phys Soc Lond Sect B. 1949; 62:676–700.
39.
NicholasT.Tensile testing of materials at high rates of strain. Exp Mech. 1981; 21(5):177–195.
40.
BragovAMIgumnovLAKonstantinovAYDeformation and fracture of titanium alloys under dynamic loading. Adv Struct Mater. 2020; 136:11–33.
41.
KhachinVNGyunterVEChernovDB.Two effects of the reversible change of shape in titanium nickelide. Phys Met Metall. 1976; 42(3):186–189.
42.
KhmelevskayaIYLagunovaMIProkoshkinSDStudy of reversible shape memory effects in thermally and thermo-mechanically treated Ti-Ni base alloys. Fiz Met Metalloved. 1994; 78(1):83–88.
43.
RyklinaEKorotitskiyAKhmelevskayaIControl of phase transformations and microstructure for optimum realisation of one-way and two-way shape memory effects in removable surgical clips. Mater Des. 2017; 136:174–184.
44.
RyklinaEPolyakovaKProkoshkinS.Comparative study of the shape memory effects in Ni-rich Ti–Ni alloy after training in various phase states. Shape Mem Superelasticity. 2020; 6(2):157–169.
BelyaevSResninaNRakhimovTMartensite stabilisation effect in Ni-rich NiTi shape memory alloy with different structure and martensitic transformations. Sens Actuat A: Phys. 2020; 305:111911.
47.
BelyaevSResninaNIvanovaAMartensite stabilisation effect in the Ni50Ti50 alloy after preliminary deformation by cooling under constant stress. Shape Mem Superelasticity. 2020; 6:223–231.
