The austenite/ferrite interface movement during intercritical annealing of 0.15C–8.0Mn–2.1Al (wt-%) steel was simulated by DICTRA software under local equilibrium and then confirmed experimentally. The simulation results show that the austenite volume fraction exceeds the thermodynamic equilibrium amount during isothermal annealing and then decreases because the interface returns from ferrite to austenite. The reverse interface movement is verified in simulated batch annealing experiment for the first time by ex-situ determining the austenite volume fraction using characterisation of XRD as well as by in-situ measuring the bulk volume change led by phase transformation using dilatometric curves.
SpeichGRDemarestVAMillerRL.Formation of austenite during intercritical annealing of dual-phase steels. Metall Trans A. 1981; 12(8):1419–1428.
2.
ZhangXGMiyamotoGKaneshitaTGrowth mode of austenite during reversion from martensite in Fe-2Mn-1.5Si-0.3C alloy: a transition in kinetics and morphology. Acta Mater. 2018; 154:1–13.
3.
YangDPDuPJWuDThe microstructure evolution and tensile properties of medium-Mn steel heat-treated by a two-step annealing process. J Mater Sci Technol. 2021; 75:205–215.
4.
JacquesPJFurnémontQLaniFMultiscale mechanics of TRIP-assisted multiphase steels: I. characterization and mechanical testing. Acta Mater. 2007; 55(11):3681–3693.
5.
WeiREnomotoMHadianRGrowth of austenite from as-quenched martensite during intercritical annealing in an Fe–0.1C–3Mn–1.5Si alloy. Acta Mater. 2013; 61(2):697–707.
6.
ÅgrenJ.Computer simulations of the austenite/ferrite diffusional transformations in low alloyed steels. Acta Metall. 1982; 30(4):841–851.
7.
NakadaNMizutaniKTsuchiyamaTDifference in transformation behavior between ferrite and austenite formations in medium manganese steel. Acta Mater. 2014; 65:251–258.
8.
LuoHWShiJWangCExperimental and numerical analysis on formation of stable austenite during the intercritical annealing of 5Mn steel. Acta Mater. 2011; 59(10):4002–4014.
9.
YangDPWuDYiHL.Reverse transformation from martensite into austenite in a medium-Mn steel. Scripta Mater. 2019; 161:1–5.
10.
DuPJYangDPBaiMKAustenite stabilisation by two step partitioning of manganese and carbon in a Mn-TRIP steel. Mater Sci Technol. 2019; 35(17):2084–2091.
11.
GibbsPJDe MoorEMerwinMJAustenite stability effects on tensile behavior of manganese-enriched-austenite transformation-induced plasticity steel. Metall Mater Trans A. 2011; 42(12):3691–3702.
12.
LeeSWLeeS-JDe CoomanBC.Austenite stability of ultrafine-grained transformation-induced plasticity steel with Mn partitioning. Scripta Mater. 2011; 65(3):225–228.
13.
YiHLSunLXiongXC.Challenges in the formability of the next generation of automotive steel sheets. Mater Sci Technol. 2018; 34(9):1112–1117.
14.
BaiMKYangDPWangGDEnhancing the robustness and effciency in the production of medium Mn steels by Al addition. Metals. 2020; 10:1432–1440.
15.
YangFLuoHHuCEffects of intercritical annealing process on microstructures and tensile properties of cold-rolled 7Mn steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2017; 685:115–122.
16.
HuyanFYanJYHöglundLSimulation of the growth of austenite from as-quenched martensite in medium Mn steels. Metall Mater Trans A. 2018; 49(4):1053–1060.
17.
KamoutsiHGiotiEHaidemenopoulosGNKinetics of solute partitioning during intercritical annealing of a medium-Mn steel. Metall Mater Trans A. 2015; 46(11):4841–4846.
18.
EmoJMaugisPPerladeA.Austenite growth and stability in medium Mn, medium Al Fe-C-Mn-Al steels. Comput Mater Sci. 2016; 125:206–217.
19.
BhadeshiaHHoneycombeR.Steels: microstructure and properties. London: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2011.
20.
De MoorEMatlockDKSpeerJGAustenite stabilization through manganese enrichment. Scripta Mater. 2011; 64(2):185–188.
21.
MehrerH.Diffusion in solids. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2007.
