The fatigue limit of the transverse direction was obtained remarkably (125 MPa) lower than that of the longitudinal direction. The fatigue anisotropy was related to different characteristics of inclusions on longitudinal and transverse planes as well as the crystallographic texture. These parameters change the fatigue crack initiation mode from the metal matrix to spherical inclusions. Exaggeratedly conservative results were obtained utilising the Murakami's model in predicting the lower bound fatigue limit and largest size of inclusion.
CzyrycaEJLinkREWongRJDevelopment and certification of HSLA-100 steel for Naval ship construction. Nav Eng J. 1990; 102(3):63–82.
2.
EbrahimiARAbyaziAAbbasiSM.Anisotropy in microalloyed S355N steel. Int J ISSI. 2008; 5:14–20.
3.
HeuschkelJ.Anisotropy and weldability. Weld J. 1971; 50(3):110–126.
4.
KrishnadevMGhaliELaroucheMCleavage failure of transformer storage tank under dynamic rates of loading: influence of base plate and weldment Microstructure and toughness. Eng Fail Anal. 2006; 13:1220–1232.
5.
SunGFYaoSWangZDMicrostructure and mechanical properties of HSLA-100 steel repaired by laser metal deposition. Surf Coat Technol. 2018; 351:198–211.
6.
AbyaziAEbrahimiA.Mechanical anisotropy in Ca-treated and ultra-low Sulphur HSLA-100 steel. Mater Sci Technol. 2016;32(10):976–984.
7.
GhoshADasSChatterjeeSEffect of cooling rate on structure and properties of an ultra-low carbon HSLA-100 grade steel. Mater Charact. 2006; 56(1):59–65.
8.
RayPKGangulyRIPandaAK.Optimization of mechanical properties of an HSLA-100 steel through control of heat treatment variables. Mater Sci Eng A. 2003; 346(1):122–131.
9.
PessardEMorelFBellettDA new approach to model the fatigue anisotropy due to non-metallic inclusions in forged steels. Int J Fatigue. 2012; 41:168–178.
10.
PessardEMorelFMorelAModelling the role of non-metallic inclusions on the anisotropic fatigue behaviour of forged steel. Int J Fatigue. 2011; 33:568–577.
11.
CyrilNSFatemiA.Experimental evaluation and modeling of sulfur content and anisotropy of sulfide inclusions on fatigue behavior of steels. Int J Fatigue. 2009; 31(3):526–537.
12.
KaynakCAnkaraABakerT.Initiation and early growth of short fatigue cracks at inclusions. Mater Sci Technol. 1996; 12:421–426.
13.
TemmelCKarlssonBIngestenNG.Fatigue anisotropy in cross-rolled, hardened medium carbon steel resulting from MnS inclusions. Metall Mater Trans A. 2006; 37(10):2995–3007.
14.
ASTM. E2283-08: standard practice for extreme value analysis of nonmetallic inclusions in steel and other microstructural features. West Conshohocken (PA): Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International; 2008.
15.
MurakamiY.Inclusion rating by statistics of extreme values and its application to fatigue strength prediction and quality control of materials. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 1994; 99(4):345–345.
16.
PanXYangJ.Probable maximum sizes of inclusions predicted by SEV and PSD for BH steels of automobile exposed panel with different sulfur contents. Metals (Basel). 2020; 10:637–653.
17.
SesanaROssolaEPagliassottoSInfluence of microinclusion in life of rolling elements: experimental, microstructural, analytical and numerical investigation. Int J Fatigue. 2020; 139:105774–105783.
18.
GaoGXuQGuoHEffect of inclusion and microstructure on the very high cycle fatigue behaviors of high strength bainite/mmartensite multiphase steels. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019; 739:404–414.
19.
TianCLiuJHLuHCEstimation of maximum inclusion by statistics of extreme values method in bearing steel. J Iron Steel Res Int. 2017; 24:1131–1136.
20.
MurakamiYUsukiH.Quantitative evaluation of effects of non-metallic inclusions on fatigue strength of high strength steels. II: fatigue limit evaluation based on statistics for extreme values of inclusion size. Int J Fatigue. 1989; 11:299–307.
21.
ZhangJMZhangJFYangZGEstimation of maximum inclusion size and fatigue strength in high-strength ADF1 steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005; 394:126–131.
22.
TanakaKMuraT.A theory of fatigue crack initiation at inclusions. Metall Trans A. 1982; 13:117–123.
23.
ChengRZhangJWangB.Formation mechanism of Voids round hard inclusion during hot rolling processes. High Temp Mater Processes. 2018; 37:717–723.
24.
ThomsonRHancockJ.Stress and strain fields around inclusions in a plastically deforming matrix. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference; 1983 Aug 15–19; Stockholm, Sweden. 1983. p. 733–737.
25.
LuoC.Evolution of voids close to an inclusion in hot deformation of metals. Comput Mater Sci. 2001; 21:360–374.
26.
WilsonAD.The influence of thickness and rolling ratio on the inclusion behavior in plate steels. Metallography. 1979; 12:233–255.
27.
RayRKJonasJJButronMPTransformation textures in steels. ISIJ Int. 1994; 34:927–942.
28.
MourinoNSPetrovRBaeJTexture dependent mechanical anisotropy of X80 pipeline steel. Adv Eng Mater. 2010; 12:973–980.
29.
BaczynskiGJonasJCollinsL.The influence of rolling practice on notch toughness and texture development in high-strength linepipe. Metall Mater Trans A. 1999; 30:3045–3054.
30.
SilvaALV.The effects of non-metallic inclusions on properties relevant to the performance of steel in structural and mechanical applications. J Mater Res Tec. 2019; 8:2408–2422.
31.
KozasuIShimizuTKubotaH.The effect of nonmetallic inclusions on ductility and toughness of structural steels. Trans Iron Steel Inst Jpn. 1973; 13:20–28.
32.
FuruyaYMatsuokaSAbeT.Inclusion-controlled fatigue properties of 1800 MPA-class spring steels. Metall Mater Trans A. 2004; 35:3737–3744.
33.
MakinoT.. The effect of inclusion geometry according to forging ratio and metal flow direction on very high-cycle fatigue properties of steel bars. Int J Fatigue30 (2008) 1409–1418.
34.
TuS. T., ZhangX.C.. Fatigue crack initiation mechanisms, Ref Modl Mater Sci Mater Eng (2016) 1–23.
35.
MaJZhangBXuDEffects of inclusion and loading direction on the fatigue behavior of hot rolled low carbon steel. Int J Fatigue. 2010; 32:1116–1125.
36.
ChanKSTianJWYangBEvolution of slip morphology and fatigue crack initiation in surface grains of Ni200. Metall Mater Trans A. 2009; 40:2545–2556.
37.
ZhangZWangZ.Grain boundary effects on cyclic deformation and fatigue damage. Prog Mater Sci. 2008; 53:1025–1099.
38.
ChanKS.Roles of microstructure in fatigue crack initiation. Int J Fatigue. 2010; 32:1428–1447.
39.
LeiZQHongYXieJEffects of inclusion size and location on very-high-cycle fatigue behavior for high strength steels. Mater Sci Eng A. 2012; 558:234–241.
40.
GaoJWPanXNHanJInfluence of artificial defects on fatigue strength of induction hardened S38C axles. Int J Fatigue. 2020; 139:105746.
41.
MurakamiYEndoM.Effects of defects, inclusions and inhomogeneities on fatigue strength. Int J Fatigue; 1994; 161(3):163–182.
42.
RotellaANadotYPiellardMInfluence of defect morphology and position on the fatigue limit of cast Al alloy: 3D characterization by X-ray microtomography of natural and artificial defects. Mater Sci Eng A. 2020; 785:139347.
KalousekJMaselEGrassieS.Perspective on metallurgy and contact mechanics. International heavy haul association STS Conference wheel/Rail interface; June 1999; Moscow.
45.
LuoCStåhlbergU.Deformation of inclusions during hot rolling of steels. J Mater Process Technol. 2001; 114:87–97.
46.
MelanderA.A finite-element study of the notch effect at surface inclusions. Int J Fatigue. 1990; 12:154–164.
47.
MelanderA.A finite element study of short cracks with different inclusion types under rolling contact fatigue load. Int J Fatigue. 1997; 19:13–24.
48.
MelanderAGustavssonA.An FEM study of driving forces of short cracks at inclusions in hard steels. Int J Fatigue. 1996; 18:389–399.
49.
YangYChuSJChenH.Crack growth and energy release rate for an angled crack under mixed mode loading. Appl Sci. 2020; 10:4227.
50.
Al-BedhanyJHLongH.Microscopic investigation of subsurface initiated damage of wind turbine gearbox bearings. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018.
51.
Al-TameemiHLongHDwyer-JoyceR.Initiation of sub-surface micro-cracks and white etching areas from debonding at non-metallic inclusions in wind turbine gearbox bearing. Wear. 2018; 406–407:22–32.
52.
ErvastiEStåhlbergU.Void initiation close to a macro-inclusion during single pass reductions in the hot rolling of steel slabs: a numerical study. J Mater Process Technol. 2005; 170:142–150.
53.
GusnJWangLZhangCEffects of non-metallic inclusions on the crack propagation in Bearing steel. Tribol Int. 2017; 106:123–131.
54.
HsuCCChungHH.Analysis of influence of aluminum content on inclusion characteristic and fatigue life of bearing steel using statistics of extreme values. Adv Mater Res. 2014;939:11–18.
55.
ZhangJMZhangJYangZGEstimation of maximum inclusion size and fatigue strength in high-strength ADF1 steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005; 394:126–131.
56.
MurakamiYEndoT.Effects of small defects on fatigue strength of metals. Int J Fatigue. 1980; 2:23–30.
57.
ÅmanMWadaKMatsungaHThe influence of interacting small defects on the fatigue limits of a pure iron and a bearing steel. Int J Fatigue. 2020; 135:105560.
58.
RoikoAHänninenHVuorikariH.Anisotropic distribution of non-metallic inclusions in a forged steel roll and its influence on fatigue limit. Int J Fatigue. 2012; 41:158–167.
