Fatigue life of Simplex P bone cement was tested at three different stress amplitudes by using specimens produced by two different mixers. Fatigue life data showed high variability in all instances. Statistical analysis showed that fatigue life was not affected by the type of mixer. Analysis of fracture surfaces showed that fatigue life variability could be attributed to the presence of defects, such as bubbles and mixing defects. Both Weibull and Tiryakioğlu distributions provided excellent fits to the fatigue life data. Moreover, the Gumbel parameters for fatigue initiator size data estimated in the Tiryakioğlu distribution agreed closely with fractographic measurements.
BarlettaASchonningACottonRTesting and comparison of the mechanical properties of commercial bone cements. Exp Tech. 2008; 32(6):48–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2008.00320.x
2.
HoeyDTaylorD.Quantitative analysis of the effect of porosity on the fatigue strength of bone cement. Acta Biomater. 2009; 5(2):719–726. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.08.024
3.
LiuYParkJNjusGBone-particle-impregnated bone cement: An in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res. 1987; 21(2):247–261. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820210208
4.
HoeyDATaylorD.Statistical distribution of the fatigue strength of porous bone cement. Biomaterials. 2009; 30(31):6309–6317. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.053
5.
TopoleskiLTDucheynePCuklerJM.A fractographic analysis of in vivo poly (methyl methacrylate) bone cement failure mechanisms. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990; 24(2):135–154. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820240202
6.
MurphyBPrendergastP.On the magnitude and variability of the fatigue strength of acrylic bone cement. Int J Fatigue. 2000; 22(10):855–864. doi: 10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00055-4
7.
HoeyDTaylorD.Comparison of the fatigue behaviour of two different forms of PMMA. Fatigue Fracture Eng Mater Struct. 2009; 32(3):261–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2009.01327.x
8.
DunneNOrrJMushipeMThe relationship between porosity and fatigue characteristics of bone cements. Biomaterials. 2003; 24(2):239–245. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00296-X
9.
JeffersJRBrowneMTaylorM.Damage accumulation, fatigue and creep behaviour of vacuum mixed bone cement. Biomaterials. 2005; 26(27):5532–5541. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.009
10.
DunneNOrrJ.Influence of mixing techniques on the physical properties of acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials. 2001; 22(13):1819–1826. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00363-X
11.
KurdyNHodgkinsonJHaynesR.Acrylic bone—cement: influence of mixer design and unmixed powder. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11(7):813–819. doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(96)80181-1
CouperMNeesonAGriffithsJ.Casting defects and the fatigue behaviour of an aluminium casting alloy. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 1990; 13(3):213–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1990.tb00594.x
14.
DavidsonCGriffithsJMachinA.The effect of solution heat-treatment time on the fatigue properties of an Al-Si-Mg casting alloy. Fatigue Fracture Eng Mater Struct. 2002; 25(2):223–230. doi: 10.1046/j.8756-758x.2001.00490.x
15.
WangQCrepeauPDavidsonCOxide films, pores and the fatigue lives of cast aluminum alloys. Metall Mater Trans B. 2006; 37(6):887–895. doi: 10.1007/BF02735010
16.
TiryakioğluM.On the relationship between statistical distributions of defect size and fatigue life in 7050-T7451 thick plate and A356-T6 castings. Mater Sci Eng A. 2009; 520(1):114–120. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.05.005
17.
TiryakioğluM.Relationship between defect size and fatigue life distributions in Al-7 Pct Si-Mg alloy castings. Metall Mater Trans A. 2009; 40(7):1623–1630. doi: 10.1007/s11661-009-9847-8
18.
WeibullW.A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech. 1951; 18:293–297.
19.
MurakamiYEndoM.Effects of defects, inclusions and inhomogeneities on fatigue strength. Int J Fatigue. 1994; 16(3):163–182. doi: 10.1016/0142-1123(94)90001-9
20.
EpsteinB.Elements of the Theory of extreme values. Technometrics. 1960; 2(1):27–41. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1960.10489878
21.
GnedenkoB.Sur la distribution limite du terme maximum d'une serie aleatoire. Ann Math. 1943; 44:423–453. doi: 10.2307/1968974
22.
GumbelEJ.Statistics of extremes. New York: Columbia University Press; 1957.
23.
AjaxonIÖhmanCPerssonC.Long-term in vitro degradation of a high-strength brushite cement in water, PBS, and serum solution. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:17. doi: 10.1155/2015/575079
24.
MeiningerSMandalSKumarAStrength reliability and in vitro degradation of three-dimensional powder printed strontium-substituted magnesium phosphate scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2016; 31:401–411. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.050
25.
TiryakioğluM.On the size distribution of fracture-initiating defects in Al- and Mg-alloy castings. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008; 476(1-2):174–177. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.04.088
26.
BerettaSMurakamiY.Statistical analysis of defects for fatigue strength prediction and quality control of materials. Fatigue Fracture Eng Mater Struct. 1998; 21(9):1049–1065. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00104.x
27.
MurakamiYBerettaS.Small defects and inhomogeneities in fatigue strength: experiments, models and statistical implications. Extremes (Boston). 1999; 2(2):123–147. doi: 10.1023/A:1009976418553
28.
JuvonenP.Effects of non-metallic inclusions on fatigue properties of calcium treated steels. PhD Thesis, Helsinki Univ Technol. 2004.
29.
GarbCLeitnerMGrünF.Fatigue strength assessment of AlSi7Cu0.5Mg T6W Castings Supported by Computed Tomography Microporosity analysis. Procedia Eng. 2016; 160:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.862
30.
ASTM. 2004. Test method for constant amplitude force controlled fatigue testing of acrylic bone cement materials. 2004 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 13.01, Medical and surgical materials and devices; anesthetic and respiratory equipment. 2004:1199–206.
31.
NealJZHendersonJSchonningAMold Development for acrylic bone cement specimens). 19th International Conference on Industry Engineering and Management Systems, IEMS; March 2013. IEMS, Cocoa Beach, FL.
32.
SoltészU.The influence of loading conditions on the life-times in fatigue testing of bone cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1994; 5(9–10):654–656. doi: 10.1007/BF00120350
33.
WrightTMRobinsonRP.Fatigue crack propagation in polymethylmethacrylate bone cements. J Mater Sci. 1982; 17(9):2463–2468. doi: 10.1007/BF00543876
34.
MolinoLNTimmie TopoleskiLD.Effect of BaSO4 on the fatigue crack propagation rate of PMMA bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996; 31(1):131–137. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199605)31:1<131::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-Q
35.
NguyenNCMaloneyWJDauskardtRH.Reliability of PMMA bone cement fixation: fracture and fatigue crack-growth behaviour. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997; 8(8):473–483. doi: 10.1023/A:1018574109544
36.
IshiharaSMcevilyAJGoshimaTOn fatigue lifetimes and fatigue crack growth behavior of bone cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2000; 11(10):661–666. doi: 10.1023/A:1008978302196
37.
EvansSL.Effects of porosity on the fatigue performance of polymethyl methacrylate bone cement: an analytical investigation, Proceedings of the Institution of mechanical Engineers, part H. J Eng Med. 2006; 220(1):1–10. doi: 10.1243/095441105X69024
38.
EvansSL.Fatigue crack propagation under variable amplitude loading in PMMA and bone cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007; 18(9):1711–1717. doi: 10.1007/s10856-007-3021-x
39.
Bialoblocka-JuszczykEBaleaniMCristofoliniLFracture properties of an acrylic bone cement. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2008; 10(1):21–26.
40.
RaceAMannKA.Fatigue crack propagation rates in PMMA bone cement cannot be reduced to a single power law. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2008; 86B(1):278–282. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31016
41.
HaoWMaLChenXComparison of the fatigue crack propagation behavior of two different forms of PMMA using two-stage zone model. J Mater Eng Perform. 2016; 25(2):493–501. doi: 10.1007/s11665-015-1852-z
42.
SheafiEMTannerKE.Relationship between fatigue parameters and fatigue crack growth in PMMA bone cement. Int J Fatigue. 2019; 120:319–328. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.11.013
43.
TiryakioğluMHudakD.On estimating Weibull modulus by the linear regression method. J Mater Sci. 2007; 42(24):10173–10179. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-2060-5
44.
TiryakioğluMHudakD.Unbiased estimates of the Weibull parameters by the linear regression method. J Mater Sci. 2008; 43(6):1914–1919. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-2457-9
45.
WangCTPilliarRM.Fracture toughness of acrylic bone cements. J Mater Sci. 1989; 24(10):3725–3738. doi: 10.1007/BF02385763
46.
TiryakioğluMCampbellJ.Weibull analysis of mechanical data for Castings: A Guide to the Interpretation of probability Plots. Metall Mater Trans A. 2010; 41(12):3121–3129. doi: 10.1007/s11661-010-0364-6
47.
TiryakioğluMNiniI.On Estimating Largest Defects in Castings. In: TiryakioğluMGriffithsWJolly M, editors. Shape Casting. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 115–123.
