Isothermal and non-isothermal pearlite transformations under 840°C warm-rolled and 950°C hot-rolled were researched. It was found that the pearlite nuclei at grain boundary and defects were increased by warm deformation. The results showed that the incubation time was shortened in the isothermal pearlite transformation and the volume fraction of pearlite was increased in continuous cooling condition by warm deformation. The pearlite transformation behaviour under continuous cooling condition was predicted by the formula of Umemoto. The critical cooling rates of the fully pearlite structures formed under warm deformation condition and hot deformation condition were calculated.
SpanosGKralMV.The proeutectoid cementite transformation in steels. Int Mater Rev. 2009; 54(1):19–47. doi: 10.1179/174328009X392949
2.
SunYKWuD.Effect of ultra-fast cooling on microstructure of large section bars of bearing steel. J Iron Steel Res Int. 2009; 16:61–65. doi: 10.1016/S1006-706X(10)60012-X
3.
LiZXLiCSZhangJMicrostructure of hot rolled 1.0C-1.5Cr bearing steel and subsequent spheroidization annealing. Metall Mater Trans A. 2016; 47(7):3607–3621. doi: 10.1007/s11661-016-3425-7
4.
DaeublerMAThompsonAWBernsteinIM.Influence of microstructure on fatigue behavior and surface fatigue crack growth of fully pearlitic steels. Metall Trans A. 1990; 21(3):925–933. doi: 10.1007/BF02656577
5.
TaleffEMLewandowskiJJPourladianB.Microstructure- property relationships in pearlitic eutectoid and hypereutectoid carbon steels. JOM. 2002; 54(7):25–30. doi: 10.1007/BF02700982
6.
HyzakJMBernsteinIM.The role of microstructure on the strength and toughness of fully pearlitic steels. Metall Trans A. 1976; 17:1217–1224. doi: 10.1007/BF02656606
7.
MarderARBramfittBL.Effect of continuous cooling on the morphology and kinetics of pearlite. Metall Trans A. 1975; 6(11):2009–2014. doi: 10.1007/BF03161825
8.
CzarskiASkowronekTMatusiewiczP.Stability of a lamellar structure- effect of the true interlamellar spacing on the durability of a pearlite colony. Arch Metall Mater. 2015; 60(4):2499–2504. doi: 10.1515/amm-2015-0405
9.
OyamaTSherbyODWadsworthJApplication of the divorced eutectoid transformation to the development of fine-grained, spheroidized structures in ultrahigh carbon steels. Scr Metall. 1984; 18(8):799–804. doi: 10.1016/0036-9748(84)90397-1
10.
HanHBZhaoXMZhaoXYEffect of proeutectoid carbide on heredity in microstructure mechanical properties and fatigue life of GCr15 bearing steel. Metall Res Technol. 2017; 114(208):1–11.
11.
LiuZC.Intergranular fracture of as-quenched martensite in high carbon steels. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.). 1990; 3(1):58–64. doi: 10.1016/S1006-7191(08)60071-X
12.
HwangHDe CoomanBC.Influence of the initial microstructure on the spheroidization of SAE 52100 bearing steel. Steel Res Int. 2016; 87(1):112–125. doi: 10.1002/srin.201400591
13.
RidleyN.A review of the data on the interlamellar spacing of pearlite. Metall Mater Trans A. 1984; 15(6):1019–1036. doi: 10.1007/BF02644694
14.
MehlRFBarrettCSSmithDW.Studies upon the widmanstatten structure, IV- The iron-carbon alloys. Trans Am Inst Min Metall Eng. 1933; 105:215–258.
15.
ElwazriAMWanjaraPYueS.The effect of microstructural characteristics of pearlite on the mechanical properties of hypereutectoid steel. Metall Mater Trans A. 2005; 36:2297–2305. doi: 10.1007/s11661-005-0102-7
16.
PanditASBhadeshiaHKDH.Diffusion-controlled growth of pearlite in ternary steels. Proc Royal Soci Math, Phys Eng Sci. 2011; 467:2948–2961. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2011.0165
17.
UmemotoMHoriuchiKTamuraI.Transformation kinetics of bainite during isothermal holding and continuous cooling. Trans Iron Steel Inst Jpn. 1982; 22:854–861. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational1966.22.854
18.
JandováD.Influence of hot and warm deformation on austenite decomposition. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng. 2006; 18(1–2):375–378.
19.
HartEW.On the role of dislocations in bulk diffusion. Acta Metall. 1957; 5(10):597. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(57)90127-X
20.
XiaoNMTongMMLanYJCoupled simulation of the influence of austenite deformation on the subsequent isothermal austenite-ferrite transformation. Acta Mater. 2006; 54:1265–1278. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.055
21.
RiosPR.Relationship between non- isothermal transformation curves and isothermal and non- isothermal kinetics. Acta Mater. 2005; 53(18):4893–4901. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.005
22.
KubanMBJayaramanRHawboltEBAn assessment of the additivity principle in predicting continuous cooling austenite to pearlite transformation kinetics using isothermal transformation data. Metall Trans A. 1986; 17(A):1493–1503. doi: 10.1007/BF02650085
23.
KamatRGHawboltEBBrownLCThe principle of additivity and the proeutectoid ferrite transformation. Metall Trans A. 1992; 23(A):2469–2480. doi: 10.1007/BF02658050
24.
KempenATWSommerFMittemeijerEJ.Determination and interpretation of isothermal and non-isothermal transformation kinetics; the effective activation energies in terms of nucleation and growth. J Mater Sci. 2002; 37(7):1321–1332. doi: 10.1023/A:1014556109351
25.
ScheilE.Anlaufzeit der austenitumwandlung [Initial period of austenite transformation]. Archiv für das Eisenhüttenwesen. 1935; 8(12):565–567. German. doi: 10.1002/srin.193500186
26.
UmemotoMHoriuchiKTamuraI.Pearlite transformation during continuous cooling and its relation to isothermal transformation. Trans Iron Steel Inst Jpn. 1983; 23:690–695. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational1966.23.690
27.
AvramiM.Kinetics of phase change. I general theory. J Chem Phys. 1939; 7:1103–1112. doi: 10.1063/1.1750380
28.
AvramiM.Kinetics of phase change. II transformation-time relations for random distribution of nuclei. J Chem Phys. 1940; 8:212–224. doi: 10.1063/1.1750631
29.
AvramiM.Granulation, phase change, and microstructure kinetics of phase change. III. J Chem Phys. 1941; 9:177–184. doi: 10.1063/1.1750872
30.
ZhangSL.Effect of deformation on the austenite to pearlite transformation. Adv Mat Res. 2011; 284–286:2358–2365.
