The bio-implant devices require adequate strength and low elastic modulus, for compatibility with human bone. In this study, the near-beta Ti–13Nb–13Zr alloy was subjected to two different solutionising temperatures and quenched at different temperatures. Microstructure modifications and its influence on microhardness, elastic modulus and tensile properties were investigated. Elastic modulus was decreased with increase in cooling rate from solutioning temperature. The samples solutionised at 900°C and quenched at sub-zero temperature contained α″ martensite along with α′ and β phases and these lowered the elastic modulus. Among all the heat-treated samples, the one solutionised at 900°C and quenched at sub-zero exhibited lowest elastic modulus of 59 GPa and adequate tensile properties for the application as bioimplants.
MohammedMTKhanZAGeethaMMicrostructure, mechanical properties and electrochemical behavior of a novel biomedical titanium alloy subjected to thermo-mechanical processing including aging. J Alloys Compd. 2015; 634:272–280. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.095.
4.
NiinomiMNakaiM.Titanium-based biomaterials for preventing stress shielding between implant devices and bone. Int J Biomater. 2011; 2011:1–10. doi:10.1155/2011/836587.
5.
BaniaPJ.Beta titanium alloys and their role in the titanium industry. JOM. 1994; 46:16–19. doi:10.1007/BF03220742.
6.
ZhouYLNiinomiMAkahoriT.Effects of Ta content on Young's modulus and tensile properties of binary Ti–Ta alloys for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004; 371:283–290. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2003.12.011.
7.
NiinomiM.Recent research and development in titanium alloys for biomedical applications and healthcare goods. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2003; 4:445–454. doi:10.1016/j.stam.2003.09.002.
8.
MohammedMTKhanZASiddiqueeAN.Beta titanium alloys: the lowest elastic modulus for biomedical applications: a review. Int J Chem2014; 8:822–827. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1094481.
9.
ChuiP.Near β-type Zr–Nb–Ti biomedical alloys with high strength and low modulus. Vacuum. 2017; 143:54–58. doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.05.039.
10.
BrailovskiVProkoshkinSGauthierMBulk and porous metastable beta Ti–Nb–Zr(Ta) alloys for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2011; 31:643–657. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2010.12.008.
11.
DavisNGTeisenJSchuhCSolid-state foaming of titanium by superplastic expansion of argon-filled pores. J Mater Res. 2001; 16:1508–1519. doi:10.1557/JMR.2001.0210.
WenCEYamadaYNouriAPorous titanium with porosity gradients for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Forum. 2007; 539–543:720–725. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.539-543.720.
14.
KhanMAWilliamsRLWilliamsDF.The corrosion behaviour of Ti–6Al–4 V, Ti–6Al–7Nb and Ti–13Nb–13Zr in protein solutions. Biomaterials. 1999; 20:631–637. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00217-8.
15.
HonY-HWangJ-YPanY-N.Composition/phase structure and properties of titanium-niobium alloys. Mater Trans. 2003; 44:2384–2390. doi:10.2320/matertrans.44.2384.
16.
SakaguchiNNiinomiMAkahoriTEffect of Ta content on mechanical properties of Ti–30Nb–XTa–5Zr. Mater Sci Eng C. 2005; 25:370–376. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2005.04.003.
17.
TakahashiMKobayashiEDoiHPhase stability and mechanical properties of biomedical & beta; type titanium-zirconium based alloys containing niobium. J Jpn Inst Met. 2000; 64:1120–1126. doi:10.2320/jinstmet1952.64.11_1120.
18.
AkahoriTNiinomiMFukuiHImprovement in fatigue characteristics of newly developed beta type titanium alloy for biomedical applications by thermo-mechanical treatments. Mater Sci Eng C. 2005; 25:248–254. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2004.12.007.
19.
GasserB.Design and engineering criteria for titanium devices. 2001; p. 673–701. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-56486-4_20.
20.
HaoYLYangRNiinomiMYoung's modulus and mechanical properties of Ti–29Nb–13Ta–4.6Zr in relation to α″ martensite. Metall Mater Trans A. 2002; 33:3137–3144. doi:10.1007/s11661-002-0299-7.
21.
GrosdidierTPhilippeMJ.Deformation induced martensite and superelasticity in a β-metastable titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2000; 291:218–223. doi:10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00921-7.
22.
AhmedTRackHJ.Martensitic transformations in Ti–(16–26 at%) Nb alloys. J Mater Sci. 1996; 31:4267–4276. doi:10.1007/BF00356449.
23.
LiuQMengQGuoSΑ′ type Ti–Nb–Zr alloys with ultra-low Young's modulus and high strength. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int. 2013; 23:562–565. doi:10.1016/j.pnsc.2013.11.005.
24.
LiJLinXGuoPElectrochemical behaviour of laser solid formed Ti–6Al–4 V alloy in a highly concentrated NaCl solution. Corros Sci. 2018; 142:161–174. doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2018.07.023.
25.
Ehtemam-HaghighiSCaoGZhangL-C.Nanoindentation study of mechanical properties of Ti based alloys with Fe and Ta additions. J Alloys Compd. 2017; 692:892–897. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.123.
26.
YangHWWenJQuanMXEvaluation of the volume fraction of nanocrystals devitrified in Al-based amorphous alloys. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2009; 355(4-5):235–238. doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.12.001.
27.
RajBMoorthyVJayakumarTAssessment of microstructures and mechanical behaviour of metallic materials through non-destructive characterisation. Int Mater Rev. 2003; 48:273–325. doi:10.1179/095066003225010254.
28.
BanerjeeDKrishnanRV.Challenges in alloy design: titanium for the aerospace industry. Proc Indian Acad Sci Sect C Eng Sci. 1981; 4:21–39. doi:10.1007/BF02843473.
29.
MajumdarPSinghSBChakrabortyM.The role of heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti–13Zr–13Nb alloy for biomedical load bearing applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011; 4:1132–1144. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.03.023.
30.
GeethaMSinghAMuraleedharanKEffect of thermomechanical processing on microstructure of a Ti–13Nb–13Zr alloy. J Alloys Compd. 2001; 329:264–271. doi:10.1016/S0925-8388(01)01604-8.
31.
GeethaMKamachi MudaliUGogiaAInfluence of microstructure and alloying elements on corrosion behavior of Ti–13Nb–13Zr alloy. Corros Sci. 2004; 46:877–892. doi:10.1016/S0010-938X(03)00186-0.
32.
TangXAhmedTRackHJ.Phase transformations in Ti–Nb–Ta and Ti–Nb–Ta–Zr alloys. J Mater Sci. 2000; 35:1805–1811. doi:10.1023/A:1004792922155.
33.
OhmoriYOgoTNakaiKEffects of ω-phase precipitation on β→α, α′′ transformations in a metastable β titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2001; 312:182–188. doi:10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01891-8.
34.
HuLGuoSMengQMetastable β-type Ti–30Nb–1Mo–4Sn alloy with ultralow young's modulus and high strength. Metall Mater Trans A. 2014; 45:547–550. doi:10.1007/s11661-013-2134-8.
35.
HoWJuCChern LinJ.Structure and properties of cast binary Ti–Mo alloys. Biomaterials. 1999; 20:2115–2122. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00114-3.
36.
KimH-SKimW-YLimS-H.Microstructure and elastic modulus of Ti–Nb–Si ternary alloys for biomedical applications. Scr Mater. 2006; 54:887–891. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.001.
37.
LinC-WJuC-PChern LinJ-H.A comparison of the fatigue behavior of cast Ti–7.5Mo with c.p. titanium, Ti–6Al–4 V and Ti–13Nb–13Zr alloys. Biomaterials. 2005; 26:2899–2907. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.007.
38.
ParkCHParkJ-WYeomJ-TEnhanced mechanical compatibility of submicrocrystalline Ti–13Nb–13Zr alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2010; 527:4914–4919. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2010.04.057.
39.
BaptistaCARSchneiderSTaddeiEFatigue behavior of arc melted Ti–13Nb–13Zr alloy. Int J Fatigue. 2004; 26:967–973. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.01.011.
