A novel short duration heat treatment schedule is proposed in the present investigation for the Al-17 wt-% Si-5 wt-% Cu alloy (AR alloy). The existing heat treatment uses long duration (4–24 h) holding at solutionising temperature prior to ageing treatment. In the present investigation, the AR alloy is subjected to isothermal holding at 590°C for 15 min followed by warm water quenching prior to the normal ageing schedule. Detailed microstructural investigations involving size and shape of primary as well as eutectic Si particles, porosity measurements along with hardness and tensile property characterisation are carried out to find the effect of isothermal heat treatment. The study reveals considerable improvement in microstructure and mechanical properties after this isothermal heat treatment.
DeyS.Elevated temperature lubricated wear of Al–Si alloys [electronic theses and dissertations]. 2012. Available fromhttps://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/457.
2.
MenzieWD, BarryJJ, BleiwasDI, The global flow of aluminum from 2006 through 2025. U.S. Geological Survey. Open-File Report 2010–1256, 2010. p. 1–73. Available fromhttp://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1256/.
3.
ShabelBS, GrangerDA, TrucknerWG.Friction and wear of aluminum–silicon alloys. In: Blau PJ, editor. ASM handbook. Materials Park (OH): ASM International; 1992. p. 785–794 (Friction, lubrication, and wear technology; vol. 18).
4.
GuT, PanY, LuT, Effects of boron addition on the morphology of silicon phases in Al–Si casting alloys. Mater Charact. 2018;141:115–119. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.04.050
5.
RaoJ, ZhangJ, LiuR, Modification of eutectic Si and the microstructure in an Al–7Si alloy with barium addition. Mater Sci Eng A. 2018;728:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.05.010
6.
TimpelM, WanderkaN, SchlesigerR, The role of strontium in modifying aluminium–silicon alloys. Acta Mater. 2012;60:3920–3928. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.031
7.
LiJH, BarrireroJ, EngstlerM, Nucleation and growth of eutectic Si in Al–Si alloys with Na addition. Metall Mater Trans A. 2015;46A:1300–1311. doi: 10.1007/s11661-014-2702-6
8.
SallehMS, OmarMZ, SyarifJ, An overview of semisolid processing of aluminium alloys. ISRN Mater Sci. 2013;2013:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2013/679820
9.
NatoriK, UtsunomiyaH, TanakaT.Improvement in formability of semi-solid cast hypoeutectic Al–Si alloys by equal-channel angular pressing. J Mater Process Technol. 2017;240:240–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.09.022
10.
NakayamaY, MiyazakiT.Effect of eutectic Si particle morphology on ECAP formability and mechanical properties of AC4CH aluminium casting alloys. Mater Trans. 2011;52:2045–2051. doi: 10.2320/matertrans.L-M2011822
11.
AmmarHR, MoreauC, SamuelAM, Influences of alloying elements, solution treatment time and quenching media on quality indices of 413-type Al–Si casting alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;489:426–438. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.12.032
12.
MohamedAMA, SamuelFH.A review on the heat treatment of Al–Si–Cu/Mg casting alloys. In: CzerwinskiFrank, editor. Heat treatment – conventional and novel applications. Croatia: InTech; 2012. p. 229–246.
13.
MondolfoLF.Aluminium alloys: structure and properties. London: Butter Worths; 1976.
14.
BarresiJ, KerrMJ, WangH, Effect of magnesium, iron, and cooling rate on mechanical properties of Al–7Si–Mg foundry alloys. AFS Trans. 2000;108:563–570.
15.
GauthierJ, LouchezPR, SamuelFH.Heat treatment of 319.2 aluminium automotive alloy: part 1, solution heat treatment. Cast Metals. 1995;8:91–106. doi: 10.1080/09534962.1995.11819197
16.
GauthierJ, LouchezPR, SamuelFH.Heat treatment of 319.2 aluminium automotive alloy: part 2, ageing behaviour. Cast Metals. 1995;8:107–114. doi: 10.1080/09534962.1995.11819198
17.
MohamedAMA, SamuelAM, SamuelFH, Influence of additives on the microstructure and tensile properties of near-eutectic Al–10.8% Si cast alloy. Mater Design. 2009;30:3943–3957. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.042
OuelletP, SamuelFH.Effect of Mg on the ageing behavior of Al–Si–Cu 319 type aluminum casting alloys. J Mater Sci. 1999;34:4671–4697. doi: 10.1023/A:1004645928886
20.
WangG, BainX, WangW, Influence of Cu and minor elements on solution treatment of Al–Si–Mg–Cu cast alloys. Mater Lett. 2003;57:4083–4087. doi: 10.1016/S0167-577X(03)00270-2
21.
SokolowskiJH, SunX-C, ByczynskiG, The removal of copper-phase segregation and the subsequent improvement in mechanical properties of cast 319 aluminium alloys by a two-stage solution heat treatment. J Mater Process Technol. 1995;53:385–392. doi: 10.1016/0924-0136(95)01995-Q
22.
SokolowskiJH, DjurdjevicMB, KierkusCA, Improvement of 319 aluminum alloy casting durability by high temperature solution treatment. J Mater Process Technol. 2001;109:174–180. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00793-7
23.
Standard test methods for determining average grain size. ASTM E112 – 10. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2010.
24.
ShuklaN, RoyH, ShowBK.Tribological behavior of a 0.33% C dual-phase steel with pre I/C hardening and tempering treatment under abrasive wear condition. Tribol Trans. 2016;59:593–603. doi: 10.1080/10402004.2015.1094841
25.
DasP, ShowBK, RathoreA, Wear behaviour of cooling slope rheocast A356 Al alloy. Tribol Trans.2015;58:1054–1066. doi: 10.1080/10402004.2015.1040905
26.
Standard test methods for tensile testing of metallic materials. E8/E8M-9. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM.
27.
WilliamsonGK, HallWH.X-ray line broadening from filed aluminium and wolfram. Acta Metall. 1953;1:22–31. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(53)90006-6
28.
SuryanarayanaC, NortonMG.X-ray diffraction – a practical approach. New York: Springer; 1998.
