The stress–strain relationship of 5052 aluminium alloy was investigated via quasi-static tensile tests and split Hopkinson pressure bar tests. The specimens were exposed to various temperatures (25–500°C) and strain rates (10−4–0.7 × 104 s−1). At strain rates ranging from 0.001 to 3000 s−1, the material underwent significant work hardening. When the strain rate exceeded 5000 s−1, the work hardening effect decreased and the flow stress was relatively constant. The Johnson–Cook constitutive model was modified to describe the deformation behaviour of the material subjected to high temperatures and strain rates. The accuracy of the modified model was verified through ballistic impact testing.
TomohiroS, TatsushiN, WatanabeT.Analysis of ultrasonic welding process of mild steel and 5052 aluminium alloy. Weld J. 2018;32(2):95–102. doi: 10.1080/09507116.2017.1346895
2.
SheppardT, JacksonA.Constitutive equations for use in prediction of flow stress during extrusion of aluminium alloys. Mater Sci Technol. 1997;13(3):203–209. doi: 10.1179/mst.1997.13.3.203
3.
GuoJH, ZhaoSD, MurakamiR, Experimental and numerical investigation for ductile fracture of Al-alloy 5052 using modified rousselier model. Compd Mater Sci. 2013;71:115–123. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.01.011
4.
LiuDH, YuHP, LiCF.Comparative study of the microstructure of 5052 aluminium alloy sheets under quasi-static and high-velocity tension. Mater Sci Eng A. 2012;A551:280–287. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.05.018
5.
RajeevK, SiaNN.Determination of temperature rise during high strain rate deformation. Mech Mater. 1998;27:1–12. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6636(97)00036-7
6.
HuHE, WangXY.A high-temperature deformation model based on dislocation movement for wrought aluminium alloys. Mater Sci Technol. 2017;33:712–718. doi: 10.1080/02670836.2016.1216026
7.
AkhtarSK, LiuHW.Variable strain rate sensitivity in an aluminum alloy: response and constitutive modelling. Int J Plasticity. 2012;36:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.02.001
8.
ManSooJ, JeaGE, LeeMC.A new method for acquiring true stress-strain curves over a large range of strains using a tensile test and finite element method. Mech Mater. 2008;40:586–593. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.11.006
9.
SongP, LiWB, WangXM.A studied on dynamic plastic deformation behaviour of 5052 aluminium Alloy; Lisbon, Portugal): Proceedings of the 1st World Conference on Advanced Materials for Defense; 2018 Sep.3-4; 2018.
10.
FieldJE, WalleySM, ProudWG, Review of experimental techniques for high rate deformation and shock studies. Int J Impact Eng. 2004;30:725–775. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.03.005
11.
JohnsonGR, CookWH.A Constitutive Model and Data for Metals Subjected to Large Strains, High Strain Rates and High Temperatures; Netherlands: 7th IBS; 1983.
12.
HuhH, KangWJ.A Tension Split Hopkinson Bar for Investigating the Dynamic Behaviour of Sheet Metals. Exp Mech. 2002;42:8–17. doi: 10.1007/BF02411046
13.
TriaDE, TrębińskiR.Methodology for experimental verification of steel armour impact modelling. Int J Impact Eng. 2017;100:102–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.10.011
14.
WangXM, JunS.. Validation of Johnson-Cook plasticity and damage model using impact experiment. Int J Impact Eng. 2013;60:67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.04.010
15.
ZhaoR, ZhaoS, GuoJ.Experimental and numerical investigation on ductile fracture mechanism of aluminium alloy using new modified model. Mater Sci Technol. 2015;31:303–309. doi: 10.1179/1743284714Y.0000000519
16.
SenthilK, IqbalMA, ChandelPS, Study of the constitutive behaviour of 7075-T651 aluminium alloy. Int J Impact Eng. 2017;108:171–190. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.05.002
17.
GilioliA, ManesA, GiglioM, Predicting ballistic impact failure of aluminium 6061-T6 with the rate-independent Bao-Wierzbicki fracture model. Int J Impact Eng. 2015;76:207–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.10.004
