In this paper, cenosphere particles embedded in AA2014 aluminium matrix are used to fabricate syntactic foam by stir casting method. The particle size is about 100 µm and foam density is about 1990 kg m−3. Compression tests at strain rate 0.001/s are performed on foam samples to characterise their mechanical properties which are then used in numerical analysis on commercial finite element analysis software ABAQUS/CAE with isotropic elastic-plastic material model. Experimental and numerical results show good conformity in deformation behaviour with elastic and plateau zones showing average deviations less than 5% and 20%, respectively. Foams showed high yield stress and energy absorption capabilities that can be useful in making blast and impact resistant structures.
RohatgiPK, GuptaN, AlarajS.Thermal expansion of aluminum-fly ash cenosphere composites synthesized by pressure infiltration technique. J Compos Mater. 2006;40:1163–1174. doi: 10.1177/0021998305057379
2.
ZhangBLY, LiS, Quasi-static and high strain rates compressive behavior of aluminum matrix syntactic foams. Compos Part B Eng. 2016;98:288–296. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.034
3.
GoelMD, MatsagarVA, GuptaAK.Blast resistance of stiffened sandwich panels with aluminum cenosphere syntactic foam. Int J Impact Eng. 2015;77:134–146. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.11.017
4.
KumarR, MondalDP, ChaudharyA, Excellent EMI shielding performance and thermal insulating properties in lightweight, multifunctional carbon-cenosphere composite foams. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2018;112:475–484. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.003
5.
SzlancsikA, KatonaB, DombovariZ, On the effective Young's modulus of metal matrix syntactic foams. Mater Sci Technol. 2017;33:2283–2289. doi: 10.1080/02670836.2017.1374497
6.
XiaX, ChenX, ZhangZ, Compressive properties of closed-cell aluminum foams with different contents of ceramic microspheres. Mater Des. 2014;56:353–358. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.040
7.
NguyenQB, Sharon NaiML, NguyenAS, Synthesis and properties of light weight magnesium-cenosphere composite. Mater Sci Technol. 2016;32:923–929. doi: 10.1080/02670836.2015.1104017
8.
MondalDP, DasS, RamakrishnanN, Cenosphere filled aluminum syntactic foam made through stir-casting technique. Compos. Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2009;40:279–288. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.006
9.
RohatgiPK, KimJK, GuoRQ, Age-hardening characteristics of aluminum alloy-hollow fly ash composites. Metall Mater Trans A. 2002;33A:1541–1547. doi: 10.1007/s11661-002-0076-7
10.
MondalDP, GoelMD.DasS.Effect of strain rate and relative density on compressive deformation behaviour of closed cell aluminum-fly ash composite foam. Mater Des. 2009;30:1268–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.06.059
GoelMD, PeroniM, SolomosG, Dynamic compression behavior of cenosphere aluminum alloy syntactic foam. Mater Des. 2012;42:418–423. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.013
13.
BirlaS, MondalDP, DasS, Compressive deformation behavior of highly porous AA2014-cenosphere closed cell hybrid foam prepared using CaH2 as foaming agent: comparison with aluminum foam and syntactic foam. Trans Indian Inst Met. 2017;70:1827–1840. doi: 10.1007/s12666-016-0984-7
LinY, ZhangQ, MaX, Mechanical behavior of pure Al and Al-Mg syntactic foam composites containing glass cenospheres Compos. Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2016;87:194–202. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.001
18.
RohatgiPK, KimJK, GuptaN, Compressive characteristics of A356/fly ash cenosphere composites synthesized by pressure infiltration technique. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2006;37:430–437. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.047
19.
AltenaijiM, GuanZW, CantwellWJ, Characterisation of aluminium matrix syntactic foams under drop weight impact. Mater Des. 2014;59:296–302. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.002
20.
ZhangLP, ZhaoYY.Mechanical response of Al matrix syntactic foams produced by pressure infiltration casting. J Compos Mater. 2007;41:2105–2117. doi: 10.1177/0021998307074132
21.
TaoXF, ZhaoYY.Compressive failure of Al alloy matrix syntactic foams manufactured by melt infiltration. Mater Sci Eng A. 2012;549:228–232. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.04.047
22.
WuGH, DouZY, JiangLT, Damping properties of aluminum matrix – fly ash composites. Mater Lett. 2006;60:2945–2948. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.02.018
23.
OrbulovIN.Compressive properties of aluminium matrix syntactic foams. Mater Sci Eng A. 2012;555:52–56. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.06.032
24.
OrbulovIN, DobranszkyJ.Producing metal matrix syntactic foams by pressure infiltration Period. Polytech Mech Eng. 2008;52:35–42. doi: 10.3311/pp.me.2008-1.06
25.
RohatgiPK, GuptaN, SchultzBF, The synthesis, compressive properties, and applications of metal matrix syntactic foams. JOM. 2011;63:36–42. doi: 10.1007/s11837-011-0026-1
26.
MuYL, YaoGC, LuoHJ.Compressive properties of closed cell Al alloy-fly ash particle composite foams. Mater Sci Technol. 2011;27:434–436. doi: 10.1179/026708309X12506933873305
27.
MondalDP, GoelMD, UpadhyayV, Comparative study on microstructural characteristics and compression deformation behaviour of alumina and cenosphere reinforced aluminum syntactic foam made through stir casting technique. Trans Indian Inst Met. 2018;71:567–577. doi: 10.1007/s12666-017-1211-x
28.
MondalDP, JhaN, BadkulA, High temperature compressive deformation behaviour of aluminum syntactic foam. Mater Sci Eng A.2012;534:521–529. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.002
29.
RamachandraM, RadhakrishnaK.Synthesis microstructure mechanical properties wear and corrosion behavior of an Al-Si (12%) flyash metal matrix composite. J Mater Sci. 2005;40:5989–5997. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-1303-6
SahuS, MondalDP, GoelMD, Finite element analysis of AA1100 elasto-plastic behaviour using Johnson-Cook model. Mater Today Proc. 2018;5(2):5349–5353. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.120
33.
GuoRQ, RohatgiPK.Chemical reactions between aluminum and fly ash during synthesis and reheating of Al-fly ash composite. Metall Mater Trans B. 1998;29B:519–525. doi: 10.1007/s11663-998-0086-y
