Grain boundary engineering (GBE) via low strain tension and annealing was used to enhance the resistance to stress corrosion cracking of a 304 stainless steel. Electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) analysis exhibited that the GBE steel had a higher fraction of low-∑ coincidence site lattice (CSL) boundaries, larger grain-clusters, longer twin boundary chains, and fewer paths of connected non-twin boundaries with a more zigzag shape. Slow strain rate tests in high-temperature water showed that the GBE steel performed better plasticity, higher tensile strength, and similar yield strength compared to conventional steel. The low fraction of random boundaries in GBE steel resulted in a lower frequency of intergranular crack initiation, and the zigzag paths of non-twin boundaries made the intergranular crack propagation more difficult.
BiHY, KokawaH, WangZJ, Suppression of chromium depletion by grain boundary structural change during twin-induced grain boundary engineering of 304 stainless steel. Scripta Mater. 2003;49(3):219–223. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6462(03)00261-6
3.
TelangA, GillAS, ZweiackerK, Effect of thermo-mechanical processing on sensitization and corrosion in alloy 600 studied by SEM- and TEM-based diffraction and orientation imaging techniques. J Nucl Mater. 2018;505:276–288. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.07.053
4.
FordFP.Quantitative prediction of environmentally assisted cracking. Corrosion. 1996;52(5):375–395. doi: 10.5006/1.3292125
5.
SaitoK, KuniyaJ.Mechanochemical model to predict stress corrosion crack growth of stainless steel in high temperature water. Corros Sci. 2001;43(9):1751–1766. doi: 10.1016/S0010-938X(00)00173-6
6.
KuangWJ, SongM, WasGS.Insights into the stress corrosion cracking of solution annealed alloy 690 in simulated pressurized water reactor primary water under dynamic straining. Acta Mater. 2018;151:321–333. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.002
7.
MossT, KuangWJ, WasGS.Stress corrosion crack initiation in alloy 690 in high temperature water. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2018;22(1):16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cossms.2018.02.001
8.
WatanabeT.Approach to grain boundary design for strong and ductile polycrystals. Res Mech. 1984;11(1):47–84.
9.
LinP, PalumboG, ErbU, Influence of grain boundary character distribution on sensitization and intergranular corrosion of alloy 600. Scripta Metall. Mater. 1995;33(9):1387–1392. doi: 10.1016/0956-716X(95)00420-Z
10.
GertsmanVY, BruemmerSM.Study of grain boundary character along intergranular stress corrosion crack paths in austenitic alloys. Acta Mater. 2001;49(9):1589–1598. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00064-7
11.
WestEA, WasGS.IGSCC of grain boundary engineered 316L and 690 in supercritical water. J Nucl Mater2009;392(2):264–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.008
12.
TelangA, GillAS, KumarM, Iterative thermomechanical processing of alloy 600 for improved resistance to corrosion and stress corrosion cracking. Acta Mater. 2016;113:180–193. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.009
13.
LiuT, XiaS, BaiQ, Three-dimensional study of grain boundary engineering effects on intergranular stress corrosion cracking of 316 stainless steel in high temperature water. J Nucl Mater. 2018;498:290–299. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.10.004
14.
KobayashiS, KobayashiR, WatanabeT.Control of grain boundary connectivity based on fractal analysis for improvement of intergranular corrosion resistance in SUS316L austenitic stainless steel. Acta Mater. 2016;102:397–405. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.075
15.
ShiF, TianPC, JiaN, Improving intergranular corrosion resistance in a nickel-free and manganese-bearing high-nitrogen austenitic stainless steel through grain boundary character distribution optimization. Corros Sci. 2016;107:49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.02.019
AlexandreanuB, SencerBH, ThaveeprungsripornV, The effect of grain boundary character distribution on the high temperature deformation behavior of Ni–16Cr–9Fe alloys. Acta Mater. 2003;51(13):3831–3848. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00207-6
18.
RahimiS, EngelbergDL, MarrowTJ.A new approach for DL-EPR testing of thermo-mechanically processed austenitic stainless steel. Corros Sci. 2011;53(12):4213–4222. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.08.033
19.
ZhangZ, XiaS, CaoW, Effects of grain boundary character on intergranular stress corrosion cracking initiation in 316 stainless steel. Acta Metall Sin. 2016;52(3):313–319.
20.
RandleV.The role of the coincidence site lattice in grain boundary engineering. London: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
21.
FuCT, WangYL, ChuXW, Grain boundary engineering for control of tellurium diffusion in GH3535 alloy. J Nucl Mater. 2017;497:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.10.052
22.
WangX, KurosawaK, HuangM, Control of precipitation behaviour of Hastelloy-X through grain boundary engineering. Mater Sci Technol. 2017;33(17):2078–2085. doi: 10.1080/02670836.2017.1345823
23.
KwonYJ, SeoHJ, KimJN, Effect of grain boundary engineering on hydrogen embrittlement in Fe-Mn-C TWIP steel at various strain rates. Corros Sci. 2018;142:213–221. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.07.028
24.
RandleV.Mechanism of twinning-induced grain boundary engineering in low stacking-fault energy materials. Acta Mater. 1999;47(15–16):4187–4196. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00277-3
25.
KumarM, KingWE, SchwartzAJ.Modifications to the microstructural topology in f.c.c. materials through thermomechanical processing. Acta Mater. 2000;48(9):2081–2091. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00045-8
26.
ShimadaM, KokawaH, WangZJ, Optimization of grain boundary character distribution for intergranular corrosion resistant 304 stainless steel by twin-induced grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater. 2002;50(9):2331–2341. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00064-2
TanL, AllenTR, BusbyJT.Grain boundary engineering for structure materials of nuclear reactors. J Nucl Mater. 2013;441(1–3):661–666. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.03.050
29.
LiuTG, XiaS, LiH, The highly twinned grain boundary network formation during grain boundary engineering. Mater Lett. 2014;133:97–100. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.166
30.
RandleV, JonesR.Grain boundary plane distributions and single-step versus multiple-step grain boundary engineering. Mater Sci Eng A. 2009;524(1–2):134–142. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.06.018
31.
KumarM, SchwartzAJ, KingWE.Microstructural evolution during grain boundary engineering of low to medium stacking fault energy fcc materials. Acta Mater. 2002;50(10):2599–2612. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00090-3
32.
LiuT, XiaS, DuD, Grain boundary engineering of large-size 316 stainless steel via warm-rolling for improving resistance to intergranular attack. Mater Lett. 2019;234:201–204. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.09.111
BoberDB, LindJ, MulayRP, The formation and characterization of large twin related domains. Acta Mater. 2017;129:500–509. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.02.051
35.
LiuT, XiaS, ZhouB, Three-dimensional characteristics of the grain boundary networks of conventional and grain boundary engineered 316L stainless steel. Mater Charact. 2017;133:60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.09.026
36.
LindJ, LiSF, KumarM.Twin related domains in 3D microstructures of conventionally processed and grain boundary engineered materials. Acta Mater. 2016;114:43–53. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.002
37.
GertsmanVY, HenagerCH.Grain boundary junctions in microstructure generated by multiple twinning. Interface Sci. 2003;11(4):403–415. doi: 10.1023/A:1026191810431
38.
BarrCM, LeffAC, DemottRW, Unraveling the origin of twin related domains and grain boundary evolution during grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater. 2018;144:281–291. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.007
39.
BrandonDG.The structure of high-angle grain boundaries. Acta Metall. 1966;14(11):1479–1484. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(66)90168-4
40.
MahajanS, PandeCS, ImamMA, Formation of annealing twins in f.c.c. crystals. Acta Mater. 1997;45(6):2633–2638. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00336-9
41.
GleiterH.The formation of annealing twins. Acta Metall. 1969;17(12):1421–1428. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(69)90004-2
42.
CaoY, DiHS.Grain boundary character distribution during the post-deformation recrystallization of Incoloy 800H at elevated temperature. Mater Lett. 2016;163:24–27. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.10.034
43.
FieldDP, BradfordLT, NowellMM, The role of annealing twins during recrystallization of Cu. Acta Mater. 2007;55(12):4233–4241. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.021
44.
HaasenP.How are new orientations generated during primary recrystallization?MTA. 1993;24(5):1001–1015. doi: 10.1007/BF02657231
45.
LiuTG, XiaS, LiH, Effect of initial grain sizes on the grain boundary network during grain boundary engineering in alloy 690. J Mater Res. 2013;28(9):1165–1176. doi: 10.1557/jmr.2013.37
46.
ZhuoZ, XiaS, BaiQ, The effect of grain boundary character distribution on the mechanical properties at different strain rates of a 316L stainless steel. J Mater Sci. 2018;53(4):2844–2858. doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1695-0
47.
RandleV, ColemanM.A study of low-strain and medium-strain grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater. 2009;57(11):3410–3421. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.002
48.
EngelbergDL, HumphreysFJ, MarrowTJ.The influence of low-strain thermo-mechanical processing on grain boundary network characteristics in type 304 austenitic stainless steel. J Microsc. 2008;230(3):435–444. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.02003.x
49.
MarrowTJ, BaboutL, JivkovAP, Three dimensional observations and modelling of intergranular stress corrosion cracking in austenitic stainless steel. J Nucl Mater. 2006;352(1–3):62–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.042
50.
StaehleRW.Quantitative micro-nano approach to SCC mechanism and prediction. TMS Fifteenth International Conference on Environment Degradation in Nuclear Power System-Water Reactors, North Oaks; 2011.
