The rate sensitivity of multiple obstacle aluminium alloy system was measured using the stress relaxation method. A discrepancy was observed between the slope of the Haasen plot (rate sensitivity of dislocation–dislocation interaction) in pure metals and in alloys strengthened by multiple obstacles. Considering a simplifying assumption of the constant obstacle force–distance profile, it is suggested that slope of the Haasen plot is governed by glide dislocations’ length taking part in a thermally activated event. The relative strength and spacing of obstacles (forest dislocations, solutes and precipitates) is proposed to affect the thermally activated dislocation length, which in turn manifests as the difference in slope of the Haasen plot.
ForemanA, MakinM.Dislocation movement through random arrays of obstacles. Philos Mag. 1966;14(131):911–924. doi: 10.1080/14786436608244762
2.
MulfordRA.Analysis of strengthening mechanisms in alloys by means of thermal-activation theory. Acta Metall. 1979;27(7):1115–1124. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(79)90129-9
3.
KocksU.Superposition of alloy hardening, strain hardening, and dynamic recovery.Strength of metals and alloys. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1980. p. 1661–1680.
4.
HaasenP.Plastic deformation of nickel single crystals at low temperatures. Philos Mag. 1958;3(28):384–418. doi: 10.1080/14786435808236826
5.
KocksU, ArgonA, AshbyM.Thermodynamics and kinetics of slip. In: ChalmersB, ChristianJW, MassalskTB, editors. Volume 19 in Progress in materials science. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1975.
6.
DiakB, SaimotoS.The determination of solute clusters in dilute aluminum alloys using strain rate sensitivity. Mater Sci Eng: A. 1997;234:1019–1022. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00342-0
7.
DiakB, UpadhyayaK, SaimotoS.Characterization of thermodynamic response by materials testing. Prog Mater Sci. 1998;43(4):223–363. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6425(98)00007-3
8.
BuchananK, ColasK, RibisJ, Analysis of the metastable precipitates in peak-hardness aged Al–Mg–Si(-Cu) alloys with differing Si contents. Acta Mater. 2017;132:209–221. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.037
9.
RodgersB, PrangnellP.Quantification of the influence of increased pre-stretching on microstructure-strength relationships in the Al–Cu–Li alloy AA2195. Acta Mater. 2016;108:55–67. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.017
10.
MishraS, KulkarniK, GuraoN.Effect of crystallographic texture on precipitation induced anisotropy in an aluminium magnesium silicon alloy. Mater Des. 2015;87:507–519. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.008
11.
KrauszAS, KrauszK.Unified constitutive laws of plastic deformation. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996.
12.
CaillardD, MartinJ-L.Thermally activated mechanisms in crystal plasticity. Oxford: Elsevier; 2003.
13.
ParkD-Y, NiewczasM.Plastic deformation of Al and AA5754 between 4.2 and 295 K. Mater Sci Eng: A. 2008;491(1):88–102. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.065
14.
PooleW, WangX, LloydD, The shearable–non-shearable transition in Al–Mg–Si–Cu precipitation hardening alloys: implications on the distribution of slip, work hardening and fracture. Philos Mag. 2005;85(26–27):3113–3135. doi: 10.1080/14786430500154935
15.
DeschampsA, DecreusB, De GeuserF, The influence of precipitation on plastic deformation of Al–Cu–Li alloys. Acta Mater. 2013;61(11):4010–4021. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.03.015
16.
ChengL, PooleW, EmburyJ, The influence of precipitation on the work-hardening behavior of the aluminum alloys AA6111 and AA7030. Metall Mater Trans A. 2003;34(11):2473–2481. doi: 10.1007/s11661-003-0007-2
17.
EsmaeiliS, LloydD, PooleW.A yield strength model for the Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloy AA6111. Acta Mater. 2003;51(8):2243–2257. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00028-4
18.
MishraS, YadavaM, KulkarniK, A modified Taylor model for predicting yield strength anisotropy in age hardenable aluminium alloys. Mater Sci Eng: A. 2017;699:217–228. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.05.062
19.
DorinT, DeschampsA, GeuserFD, Quantification and modelling of the microstructure/strength relationship by tailoring the morphological parameters of the T1 phase in an Al–Cu–Li alloy. Acta Mater. 2014;75(Suppl C):134–146. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.046
