The effect of strain rate on deformation microstructures and mechanical properties of Fe–18Cr–8Ni austenitic stainless steel was investigated at strain rates of from 10−3 to 100 s−1. The results indicated that the deformation mechanism of steel changes from transformation induced plasticity (TRIP) to TRIP + twinning induced plasticity (TWIP) effect when the strain rate is increased from 10−3 to 100 s−1. The yield strength of steel increases gradually with strain rate increased, while the tensile strength and elongation first decreases and then increases slowly. The changes in tensile strength and elongation are due to the change of deformation mechanism with the strain rate increased.
SrinivasanVS, ValsanM.High temperature time-dependent low cycle fatigue behaviour of a type 316LN stainless steel. Int J Fatigue. 1999;21:11–21. doi: 10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00052-8
4.
TalonenJ, NenonenP, PapeG, Effect of strain rate on the strain-induced γ→α′-martensite transformation and mechanical properties of austenitic stainless steels. Metall Trans. 2005;36A:421–432. doi: 10.1007/s11661-005-0313-y
5.
LeeWS, LinCF, LiuTJ.Strain rate dependence of impact properties of sintered 316L stainless steel. J Nucl Mater. 2006;359(3):247–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.09.003
6.
FerreiraPJ, SandeJBV, FortesMA, Microstructure development during high-velocity deformation. Metall Mater Trans A. 2004;35(10):3091–3101. doi: 10.1007/s11661-004-0054-3
7.
AllainS, ChateauJP, BouazizO, Correlations between calculated stacking fault energy and the plasticity mechanisms in Fe-Mn-C alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004;387–389:158–162.
8.
LeeTH, ShinE, OhCS, Correlation between stacking fault energy and deformation microstructure in high-interstitial-alloyed austenitic steels. Acta Mater. 2010;58:3173–3186. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.056
9.
CoomanBCD, KwonO, ChinKG.State-of-the-knowledge on TWIP steel. Mater Sci Technol. 2012;5:513–527. doi: 10.1179/1743284711Y.0000000095
10.
AllainS, ChateauJP, BouazizO, Correlations between the calculated stacking fault energy and the plasticity mechanisms in Fe–Mn–C alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004;387–389: 158–162. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.01.059
11.
Saeed-AkbariA, ImlauJ, PrahlU, Derivation and variation in composition-dependent stacking fault energy maps based on subregular solution model in high-manganese steels. Metall Mater Trans A. 2009;40A:3076–3090. doi: 10.1007/s11661-009-0050-8
12.
CurtzeS, KuokkalaVT.Dependence of tensile deformation behavior of TWIP steels on stacking fault energy, temperature and strain rate. Acta Mater. 2010;58:5129–5141. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.049
13.
LichtenfeldJA, TyneCJV, MatayaMC.Effect of strain rate on stress-strain behavior of alloy 309 and 304L austenitic stainless steel. Metall Mater Trans A. 2006;37(1):147–161. doi: 10.1007/s11661-006-0160-5
14.
LeeS, EstrinY, CoomanBCD.Effect of the strain rate on the TRIP-TWIP transition in austenitic Fe-12pct Mn-0.6pct C TWIP steel. Metall Mater Trans A. 2014;45:717–730. doi: 10.1007/s11661-013-2028-9
15.
LivitsanosCP, ThomsonPF.The effect of temperature and deformation rate on transformation-dependent ductility of a metastable austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng. 1977;30:93–98. doi: 10.1016/0025-5416(77)90216-6
16.
HuangGL, MatlockDK, KraussG.Martensite formation, strain rate sensitivity, and deformation behavior of type 304 stainless steel sheet. Metall Trans A. 1989;20A:1239–1246. doi: 10.1007/BF02647406
17.
LeeWS, LinCF.The morphologies and characteristics of impact-induced martensite in 304L stainless steel. Scripta Mater. 2000;43(8):777–782. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00487-5
18.
BrofmanPJ, AnsellGS.On the effect of carbon on the stacking fault energy of austenitic stainless steels. Metall Trans A. 1978;9:879–880. doi: 10.1007/BF02649799
19.
XuDM, LiGQ, WanXL, Deformation behavior of high yield strength-high ductility ultrafine- grained 316LN austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2017;688:407–415. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.02.009
20.
NoharaK, OnoY, OhashiN.Composition and grain size dependencies of strain-induced martensitic transformation in metastable austenitic stainless steels. Iron Steel Inst Jpn. 1977;63:772–782. doi: 10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.63.5_772
21.
DicksonMJ.The significance of texture parameters in phase analysis by X-ray diffraction. J Appl Crystallogr. 1969;2(4):176–180. doi: 10.1107/S0021889869006881
22.
JohannsenDL, KyrolainenA, FerreiraPJ.Influence of annealing treatment on the formation of nano/sub micron grain size AISI 301 austenitic stainless steels. Metall Mater Trans A. 2006;37(8):2325–2338. doi: 10.1007/BF02586207
23.
DeAK, SpeerJG, MatlockDK, Deformation-induced phase transformation and strain hardening in type 304 austenitic stainless steel. Metall Mater Trans A. 2006;37(6):1875–1886. doi: 10.1007/s11661-006-0130-y
24.
HedströmP, LienertU, AlmerJ, Stepwise transformation behavior of the strain-induced martensitic transformation in a metastable stainless steel. Scripta Mater. 2007;56(3):213–216. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.10.009
25.
TalonenJ, HänninenH.Formation of shear bands and strain-induced martensite during plastic deformation of metastable austenitic stainless steels. Acta Mater. 2007;55(18):6108–6118. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.015
26.
HeckerSS, StoutMG, StaudhammerKP, Effects of strain state and strain rate on deformation-induced transformation in 304 stainless steel: part I. Magnetic measurements and mechanical behavior. Metall Trans A. 1982;13(4):619–626. doi: 10.1007/BF02644427
27.
DasYB, ForseyAN, KelleherJ, The influence of temperature on deformation-induced martensitic transformation in 301 stainless steel. Mater Sci Technol. 2018: 1–12.
28.
TsuchidaN, YamaguchiY, MorimotoY, Effects of temperature and strain rate on TRIP effect in SUS301L metastable austenitic stainless steel. Iron Steel Inst Jpn. 2013;53(10):1881–1887. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.53.1881
29.
KumarBR, RaabeD.Tensile deformation characteristics of bulk ultrafine-grained austenitic stainless steel produced by thermal cycling. Scripta Mater. 2012;66(9):634–637. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.052
30.
LeeWS, LinCF.Comparative study of the impact response and microstructure of 304L stainless steel with and without prestrain. Metall Mater Trans A. 2002;33(9):2801–2810. doi: 10.1007/s11661-002-0265-4
31.
LeeWS, ChenTH.Rate-dependent deformation and dislocation substructure of Al-Sc alloy. Scripta Mater. 2006;54(8):1463–1468. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.12.054
32.
DasYB, ForseyAN, SimmTH, In situ observation of strain and phase transformation in plastically deformed 301 austenitic stainless steel. Mater Des. 2016;112:107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.057
33.
BlicharskiM, GorczycaS.Structural inhomogeneity of deformed austenitic stainless steel. Met Sci. 1978;6:303–312. doi: 10.1179/msc.1978.12.7.303
34.
ClauerAH, HolbrookJH.In: Meyers MA, Murr LE, editors. Shock waves and high strain rate phenomena in metals. NY: Plenum Press; 1981. p. 675.
35.
CuiZQ, LiuBX.Principles of metallography and heat treatment [M]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology press; 2004. (In Chinese).
36.
DasA, SivaprasadS, ChakrabortiPC, Correspondence of fracture surface features with mechanical properties in 304LN stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;496(1–2):98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.05.007
37.
MisraRDK, WanXL, ChallaVSA, Relationship of grain size and deformation mechanism to the fracture behavior in high strength-high ductility nanostructured austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;626:41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.12.052
38.
XuDM, WanXL, YuJX, Effect of grain refinement on strain hardening and fracture in austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Technol. 2018;34(11):1344–1352. doi: 10.1080/02670836.2018.1451735
