The homogenisation (Stage III) of austenite during non-equilibrium heating of hypereutectoid steels has been characterised for the first time through dilatometric strain measurements and electron microscopic techniques. It has been found that the homogenisation temperature (Ach) is significantly higher than the cementite dissolution temperature (Acm). Though there is a complete conversion of low-temperature constituents to austenite above the Acm, a significant segregation of carbon in the austenite is observed below the Ach. Performing heat treatment with an incomplete austenitisation between the Acm and the Ach temperature can affect the subsequent on-cooling phase transformations. It is proposed that the Ach temperature should be used as the full austenitisation temperature in hypereutectoid steels.
HillertM, NilssonK, TorndahlL.Effect of alloying elements on the formation of austenite and dissolution of cementite. J Iron Steel Inst. 1971;1:49–66.
2.
A1033-04. Standard practice for quantitative measurement and reporting of hypoeutectoid carbon and Low-alloy steel phase transformations. ASTM Standards. 2004;4, Reapproved 2015:1–14.
Thermal analysis of materials. CRC Press; 1994; ISBN 9780824789633.
5.
Garcia de AndresC, CaballeroF, CapdevilaC, Application of dilatometric analysis to the study of solid–solid phase transformations in steels. Mater Charact. 2002;48(1):101–111. doi: 10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00259-0
6.
Garcia de AndresC, CaballeroF, CapdevilaC.Dilatometric characterization of pearlite dissolution in 0.1C–0.5Mn low carbon low manganese steel. Scr Mater. 1998;38(12):1835–1842. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6462(98)00131-6
7.
YangHS, BhadeshiaHKDH.Uncertainties in dilatometric determination of martensite start temperature. Mater Sci Technol. 2007;23(5):556–560. doi: 10.1179/174328407X176857
8.
CaballeroFG, CapdevilaC, de AndresCG.An attempt to establish the variables that most directly influence the austenite formation process in steels. ISIJ Int. 2003;43(5):726–735. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.43.726
9.
PawlowskiB.Dilatometric examination of continuously heated austenite formation in hypoeutectoid steels. J Achieve Mater Manuf Eng. 2012;54(2):185–193.
10.
SurmH, KesslerO, HunkelM, Modelling the ferrite/carbide to austenite transformation of hypoeutectoid and hypereutectoid steels. J Phys IV (Proceedings). 2004;120:111–119.
11.
LiCM, SommerF, MittemeijerEJ.Quantitative dilatometric analysis of the isothermal decomposition of hypereutectoid Fe–C austenite. Z Metallk. 2001;92(1):32–36.
12.
LeeSJ, ClarkeKD.A conversional model for austenite formation in hypereutectoid steels. Metall Mater Trans A. 2010;41(12):3027–3031. doi: 10.1007/s11661-010-0418-9
13.
LeeSJ, ClarkeKD.A quantitative investigation of cementite dissolution kinetics for continuous heating of hypereutectoid steel. Metall Mater Trans A. 2015;46(9):3917–3923. doi: 10.1007/s11661-015-2995-0
14.
ChaeJY, JangJH, ZhangG, Dilatometric analysis of cementite dissolution in hypereutectoid steels containing Cr. Scr Mater. 2011;65(3):245–248. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.04.018
15.
LiZ, WenZ, SuF, Dilatometric research on pearlite-to-austenite transformation of Fe–1C–1.44Cr low-alloy steel. J Mater Sci. 2018;53(2):1424–1436. doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1556-x
16.
PawlowskiB.Dilatometric examination of continuously heated austenite formation in hypoeutectoid steels. J Achieve Mater Manuf Eng. 2012;54(2):185–193.
17.
JEOL JAMP 9500 F – Information for Publications; 2016.
18.
DoebelinN, KleebergR.Profex: a graphical user interface for the Rietveld refinement program BGMN. J Appl Crystallogr. 2015;48(5):1573–1580. doi: 10.1107/S1600576715014685
19.
CaballeroFG, CapdevilaC, de AndresCG.Influence of pearlite morphology and heating rate on the kinetics of continuously heated austenite formation in a eutectoid steel. Metall Mater Trans A. 2001;32(6):1283–1291. doi: 10.1007/s11661-001-0218-3
20.
AndrewsK.Empirical formulae for the calculation of some transformation temperatures. J Iron Steel Inst. 1965;203(7):721–727.
21.
Garcia-JuncedaA, CapdevilaC, CaballeroF, Dependence of martensite start temperature on fine austenite grain size. Scr Mater. 2008;58(2):134–137. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.09.017
22.
OninkM, BrakmanCM, TichelaarFD, The lattice parameter of austenitte and ferrite in Fe–C alloys as function of carbon concentration and temperature. Scr Metall Mater. 1993;29(c):1011–1016. doi: 10.1016/0956-716X(93)90169-S
23.
XiaY, EnomotoM, YangZ, Effects of alloying elements on the kinetics of austenitization from pearlite in Fe–C–M alloys. Philos Mag. 2013;93(9):1095–1109. doi: 10.1080/14786435.2012.744484
24.
YangZN, XiaY, EnomotoM, Effect of alloying element partition in pearlite on the growth of austenite in high-carbon Low alloy steel. Metall Mater Trans A. 2016;47(3):1019–1027. doi: 10.1007/s11661-015-3272-y
25.
PorterDA, EasterlingKE, SherifM.Phase transformations in metals and alloys, (Revised Reprint). CRC Press; 2009.
26.
DiggesTG, RosenbergSJ.Metallographic study of the formation of austenite from aggregates of ferrite and cementite in an iron–carbon alloy of 0.5 percent carb. Natl. Bur. Stand. 1942;29:113–121. doi: 10.6028/jres.029.002
27.
RobinsonMDE.The characteristics of the formation of austenite in eutectoid steel. PhD Thesis, University of British Columbia; 1947.
28.
HillertM.On the theory of normal and abnormal grain growth. Acta Metall. 1965;13(3):227–238. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(65)90200-2
29.
MilitzerM, HawboltEB, Ray MeadowcroftT, Austenite grain growth kinetics in Al-killed plain carbon steels. Metall Mater Trans A. 1996;27(11):3399–3409. doi: 10.1007/BF02595433
