Impression creep behaviour of the powder metallurgy processed steel matrix composites was investigated under constant stress at different temperatures in the range of 873–973 K. By using the power-law relationship, the estimated activation energy for unreinforced steel was found to be 149 kJ mol−1 and steel reinforced with 2 and 4 vol.-% TiB2 was found to be 298 and 338 kJ mol−1, respectively indicating better creep resistance of the reinforced steel matrix composites. Dislocation creep is the dominant creep mechanism based on the calculated values of stress exponent and activation energy. Hence, this method can be used to assess the potential of steel matrix composites for use as structural materials for high-temperature application.
RanaR.High modulus steels. Can Metall Q2014;53(3):241–242. doi: 10.1179/0008443314Z.000000000178
2.
SulimaI, KowalikR, HyjekP.The corrosion and mechanical properties of spark plasma sintered composites reinforced with titanium diboride. J Alloys Compd. 2016;688:1195–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.132
3.
ChawlaN, ShenYL.Mechanical behavior of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Adv Eng Mater. 2001;3:357–370. doi: 10.1002/1527-2648(200106)3:6<357::AID-ADEM357>3.0.CO;2-I
4.
KulikowskiZ, GodfreyTMT, WisbeyA, Mechanical and microstructural behaviour of particulate reinforced steel for structural application. Mater Sci Technol. 2000;16:1453–1464. doi: 10.1179/026708300101507451
5.
NaveenaPP, LahaK, Study on creep deformation mechanism of 316LN stainless steel from impression creep tests. Mater High Temp. 2014;31:180–184. doi: 10.1179/1878641314Y.0000000012
6.
RanaR, LahayeC, RayRK.Overview of lightweight ferrous materials: strategies and promises. JOM. 2014;66(9):1734–1746. doi: 10.1007/s11837-014-1126-5
7.
SulimaI, BoczkalG.Micromechanical, high-tempera-ture testing of steel–TiB2 composite sintered by high pressure–high temperature method. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;644:76–78. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.07.047
8.
RanaR, LiuC.Effects of ceramic particles and composition on elastic modulus of low density steels for automotive applications. Can Metall Q. 2014;53(3):300–316. doi: 10.1179/1879139514Y.0000000130
9.
GaiLI, Ziemnicka-SylwesterM.The TiB2-based Fe-matrix composites fabricated using elemental powders in one step process by means of SHS combined with pseudo-HIP. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater. 2014;45:141–146. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2014.04.008
10.
ZhouX, WangM, FuY, Effect of borides on hot deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of powder metallurgy high borated stainless steel. Mater Charact. 2017;124:182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.01.001
11.
ZhangZ, ShenP, WangY, Fabrication of TiC and titanium diboride locally reinforced steel matrix composites using a Fe–Ti–B4C–C system by an SHS-casting route. J Mater Sci. 2007;42:8350–8356. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0764-6
12.
KhoaHX, TuanNQ, LeeYH, Fabrication of Fe-titanium diboride composite powder by high energy milling and subsequent reaction synthesis. J Korean Powder Metall Inst. 2013;20(3):221–227. doi: 10.4150/KPMI.2013.20.3.221
13.
AkhtarF.Microstructure evolution and wear properties of In situ synthesized titanium diboride and TiC reinforced steel matrix composites. J Alloys Compd2008;459:491–497. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.05.018
14.
HeS, FanX, ChangQ, TiC-Fe-Based composite coating prepared by self-propagating high-temperature synthesis. Metall Mater Trans B. 2017;48(3):1748–1753. doi: 10.1007/s11663-017-0942-8
15.
VerezubO, KálaziZ, BuzaG, In-situ synthesis of a carbide reinforced steel matrix surface nano composite by laser melt injection technology and subsequent heat treatment. Surf Coat Technol. 2009;203:3049–3057. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.03.024
16.
FirouzbakhtA, RazaviM, RahimipourMR.In situ synthesis of Fe–TiC nanocomposite coating on CK45 steel from ilmenite concentrate by plasma-spray method. J Tribology. 2017;139:1–9.
17.
Aparicio-FernandezR, SpringerH, SzczepaniakA, In-situ metal matrix composite steels: effect of alloying and annealing on morphology, structure and mechanical properties of TiB2 particle containing high modulus steels. Acta Mater. 2016;107:38–48. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.01.048
18.
BainsPS, SidhuSS, PayalHS.Fabrication and machining of metal matrix composites: A review. Mater Manuf Processes. 2016;31:553–573. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2015.1025976
19.
SulimaI, HyjekP, TokarskiT.Influence of annealing conditions on the properties and microstructure of steel composites. Metall Foundry Eng. 2014;40(1):33–43. doi: 10.7494/mafe.2014.40.1.33
20.
TjongSC, LauKC.Abrasion resistance of stainless-steel composites reinforced with hard titanium diboride particles. Compos Sci Technol. 2000;60:1141–1146. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00008-7
21.
SulimaI, JaworskaL, FigielP.Influence of processing parameters and different content of titanium diboride ceramics on the properties of composites sintered by high pressure - high temperature (HP-HT) method. Arch Metall Mater. 2014;59(1):205–209. doi: 10.2478/amm-2014-0033
22.
SulimaI, KlimczykP, MalczewskiP.Effect of TiB2 particles on the tribological properties of stainless steel matrix composites. Acta Metall Sinica. 2014;27(1):12–18. doi: 10.1007/s40195-013-0002-6
23.
SubramanianC, MurthyT, SuriAK.Synthesis and consolidation of titanium diboride. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater. 2007;25:345–350. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2006.09.003
24.
FrostHJ, AshbyMF.Deformation-Mechanism maps, The plasticity and creep of metals and ceramics. Oxford: Pergamon; 1982.
25.
SahooS, JhaBB, SahooTK, Influence of reinforcement and processing on steel-based composites: microstructure and mechanical response. Mater Manuf Processes. 2018;33(5):564–571. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2017.1364865
26.
SulimaI, PutyraP, HyjekP, Effect of SPS parameters on densification and properties of steel matrix composites. Adv Powder Technol. 2015;26:1152–1161. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2015.05.010
27.
CanakciA, VaroT.Microstructure and properties of AA7075/Al–SiC composites fabricated using powder metallurgy and hot pressing. Powder Technol. 2014;268:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.08.016
28.
KimJM, ParkJS, YunHS.Microstructure and mechanical properties of TiC nanoparticle reinforced iron-matrix composites. Strength Mater. 2014;46(2):177–182. doi: 10.1007/s11223-014-9533-y
29.
ZhouX, WangM, FuY, Effect of borides on hot deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of powder metallurgy high borated stainless steel. Mater Charact. 2017;124:182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.01.001
30.
TianBH, ZhangXW, ZhaoRL, Microstructure and properties of vacuum hot-press sintered W/Cu-Al2O3 composite. Rev Adv Mater Sci2013;33:219–223.
31.
AlizadehA, AbdollahiA, BiukaniH.Creep behavior and wear resistance of Al 5083 based hybrid composites reinforced with carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and boron carbide (B4C). J Alloys Compd. 2015;650:783–793. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.214
32.
MulhearnTO, TaborD.Creep and hardness of metals: a physical study. J Inst Met1960-1961;89:7–12.
33.
MondalAK, KumarS.Impression creep behaviour of magnesium alloy-based hybrid composites in the longitudinal direction. Compos Sci Technol. 2008;68:3251–3258. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.08.007
34.
RyuHJ, SohnWH, HongSH.Effect of sic volume fraction on creep behavior of SiCp/2124Al metal matrix composite. Mater Sci Res. 1999;5(4):280–284.
RyuHJ, ChungKH, ChaSI, Analysis of creep behavior of SiC/Al metal matrix composites based on a generalized shear-lag model. J Mater Res. 2004;19(12):3633–3640. doi: 10.1557/JMR.2004.0472
37.
DehnaviM, VafaeenezhadH, KhakzadiM, Modelling and prediction impression creep behaviour of Al–Cu cast alloy. Int J Cast Met Res. 2017;30(2):70–80. doi: 10.1080/13640461.2016.1242191
38.
Mathew MDN, VijayanandD.Impression creep behavior of 316LN stainless steel. J Mater Eng Perform. 2013;22:492–497. doi: 10.1007/s11665-012-0290-4
39.
BorisenkoVA, KrashchenkoVP.Temperature dependences of hardness of group IB metals. Acta Metall. 1977;25(3):251–256. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(77)90143-2
40.
ParkKT, LaverniaEJ, MohamedFA.High temperature creep of silicon carbide particulate - rein-forced aluminium. Acta Metall Mater. 1990;38:2149–2159. doi: 10.1016/0956-7151(90)90082-R
41.
ChenW, ChaturvediMC.The effect of grain boundary precipitates on the creep behavior of Inconel 718. Mater Sci Eng A. 1994;183:81–89. doi: 10.1016/0921-5093(94)90892-3
42.
ReddyAC, ZitounE.Strengthening mechanisms and fracture behavior of 7072Al/Al2O3 metal matrix composites. Int J Eng Sci Technol. 2011;7:6090–6100.
43.
SherbyOD, TaleffEM.Influence of grain size, solute atoms and second-phase particles on creep behavior of polycrystalline solids. Mater Sci Eng A. 2002;322:89–99. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01121-2
44.
LiY, LangdonTG.Creep behavior of an Al-6061 metal matrix composite reinforced with alumina particulates. Acta Mater. 1997;45(11):4797–4806. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00132-8
45.
HanT, LiJ, ZhaoN, In-situ fabrication of nano-sized TiO2 reinforced Cu matrix composites with well-balanced mechanical properties and electrical conductivity. Powder Technol. 2017;321:66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.08.019
46.
KellyA, StreetKN.Creep of discontinuous fiber composites II, theory for the steady-state. Proc R Soc Lon. 1972;328(2):283–293. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1972.0078
47.
DeanJ, BradburyA, Aldrich-SmithG, A procedure for extracting primary and secondary creep parameters from nanoindentation data. Mech Mater. 2013;65:124–134. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.05.014
48.
TjongSC, MaZY.The high-temperature creep behav-iour of aluminium-matrix composites reinforced with Sic, A12O3 and TiB2 particles. Compos Sci Technol1997;51:697–702. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00029-8
49.
TjongSC, MaZY.Steady state creep deformation behaviour of SiC particle reinforced 2618 aluminium alloy based composites. Mater Sci Technol. 1999;13:429–435. doi: 10.1179/026708399101505897
50.
LiY, LangdonTG.Creep behavior of an Al-6061 metal matrix composite reinforced with alumina particulates. Acta Mater. 1997;45(11):4797–4806. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00132-8
51.
VitosL, NilssonJO, JohanssonB.Alloying effects on the stacking fault energy in austenitic stainless steels from first-principles theory. Acta Mater. 2006;54:3821–3826. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.013
