Ti-55531 alloy with an acicular α initial microstructure was hot-compressed at 998 K using strain rates of 0.001 and 1 s−1. The effects of strain rate on the fragmentation of acicular α were investigated using electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) from the standpoint of grain boundary evolution, e.g. low/high angle boundaries (LABs/HABs), the evolution of microtexture and the destruction of the Burgers orientation relationship (BOR) at α/β boundaries. Changes in the LAB fraction and average misorientation up to equilibrium indicate that the formation of LABs and a subsequent transition to HABs are prerequisites for the fragmentation of acicular α. The weakening of microtexture results from the formation of LABs/HABs in acicular α and the destruction of the BOR at α/β boundaries.
LvYP, LiSJ, ZhangXY, Modeling and finite element analysis for the dynamic recrystallization behavior of Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr-1Zr near β titanium alloy during Hot deformation. High Temp Mater Process. 2018;37:445–454. doi: 10.1515/htmp-2016-0238
2.
WarchomickaF, PolettiC, StockingerM.Study of the hot deformation behaviour in Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–3Cr–1Zr. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011;528:8277–8285. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.068
3.
DikovitsM, PolettiC, WarchomickaF.Deformation mechanisms in the near-β titanium alloy Ti-55531. Metall Mater Trans A. 2014;45:1586–1596. doi: 10.1007/s11661-013-2073-4
4.
LeyensC, PetersM.Titanium and titanium alloys: fundamentals and applications. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH.; 2003.
5.
MeshramSD, MohandasT.Influence of matrix microst-ructure on aging response of near alpha titanium alloy (IMI834) parent metal and welds on toughness. Mater Sci Technol. 2011;27:235–239. doi: 10.1179/174328409X439141
6.
SemiatinSL, StefanssonN, DohertyRD.Prediction of the kinetics of static globularization of Ti-6Al-4V. Metall Mater Trans A. 2005;36:1372–1376. doi: 10.1007/s11661-005-0229-6
7.
WeissI, FroesFH, EylonD, Modification of alpha morphology in Ti-6Al-4V by thermomechanical processing. Metall Trans A. 1986;17:1935–1947. doi: 10.1007/BF02644991
8.
WuCB, HeY, FanXG, Dynamic globularization kinetics during hot working of TA15 titanium alloy with colony microstructure. Trans Nonferr Metal Soc Chin. 2011;21:1963–1969. doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(11)60957-6
9.
HeD, ZhuJC, LaiZH, An experimental study of deformation mechanism and microstructure evolution during hot deformation of Ti–6Al–2Zr–1Mo–1V alloy. Mater Des. 2013;46:38–48. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.045
10.
SemiatinSL, SeetharamanV, WeissI.Flow behavior and globularization kinetics during hot working of Ti–6Al–4 V with a colony alpha microstructure. Mater Sci Eng A. 1999;263:257–271. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)01156-3
11.
SongHW, ZhangSH, ChengM.Dynamic globularization kinetics during hot working of a two phase titanium alloy with a colony alpha microstructure. J Alloy Compd. 2009;480:922–927. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.02.059
12.
BielerTR, SemiatinSL.The origins of heterogeneous deformation during primary hot working of Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Plasticity. 2002;18:1165–1189. doi: 10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00057-2
13.
MironovS, MurzinovaM, ZherebtsovS, Micros-tructure evolution during warm working of Ti–6Al–4V with a colony-α microstructure. Acta Metall. 2009;57:2470–2481.
14.
CabibboM, ZherebtsovS, MironovS, Loss of coherency and interphase α/β angular deviation from the Burgers orientation relationship in a Ti–6Al–4V alloy compressed at 800°C. J Mater Sci. 2013;48:1100–1110. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-6842-z
15.
ZherebtsovSV, MurzinovaMA, KlimovaMV, Microstructure evolution during warm working of Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–1Cr–1Fe at 600 and 800°C. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013;563:168–176. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.042
16.
BalachandranS, KashiwarA, ChoudhuryA, On variant distribution and coarsening behavior of the α phase in a metastable β titanium alloy. Acta Matall. 2016;106:374–387. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.01.023
17.
LiL, LuoJ, YanJJ, Dynamic globularization and restoration mechanism of Ti–5Al–2Sn–2Zr–4Mo–4Cr alloy during isothermal compression. J Alloy Compd. 2015;622:174–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.10.043
18.
YangJL, WangGF, JiaoXY, Dynamic spheroidisation behaviour of the lamellar Ti–22Al–25Nb alloy during hot compression. Mater Sci Technol. 2018;34:961–967. doi: 10.1080/02670836.2017.1415013
19.
KlimovaM, ZherebtsovS, SalishchevG, Influence of deformation on the Burgers orientation relationship between the α and β phases in Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–1Cr–1Fe. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;645:292–297. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.08.008
20.
ZherebtsovS, MurzinovaM, SalishchevG, Spheroidization of the lamellar microstructure in Ti–6Al–4 V alloy during warm deformation and annealing. Acta Metall. 2011;59:4138–4150.
21.
BalachandranS, KumarS, BanerjeeD.On recrystallization of the α and β phases in titanium alloys. Acta Metall. 2017;131:423–434.
22.
ZherebtsovS, SalishchevG, Lee SemiatinS.Loss of coherency of the alpha/beta interface boundary in titanium alloys during deformation. Philos Mag Lett. 2010;90:903–914. doi: 10.1080/09500839.2010.521526
23.
KacherJ, RobertsonM.In situ and tomographic analysis of dislocation/grain boundary interactions in α-titanium. Philos Mag. 2014;94:814–829. doi: 10.1080/14786435.2013.868942
24.
SavageMF, TatalovichJ, MillsMJ.Anisotropy in the room-temperature deformation of α–β colonies in titanium alloys: role of the α–β interface. Philos Mag. 2004;84:1127–1154. doi: 10.1080/1478643032000158305
25.
ParkCH, WonJW, ParkJ-W, Mechanisms and kinetics of static spheroidization of hot-worked Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1 Si with a lamellar microstructure. Metall Mater Trans A. 2012;43:977–985. doi: 10.1007/s11661-011-1019-y
