A copper alloy of Cu–1.9 wt-%Ti–0.7 wt-%B was fabricated by vacuum induction melting and casting followed by cold working and annealing. Four strengthening methods has been involved during the preparation of the alloy, and the combined action of these methods results in the alloy with the tensile strength of 530 ± 24 MPa and the electrical conductivity (EC) of 48.0 ± 2.1% International Annealed Copper Standard. The specific contribution (or deterioration) of different strengthening methods to hardness and EC was quantitatively evaluated. With regard to combined properties of Cu–Ti–B alloys, age hardening and forming TiB2 particles are two effective methods to improve hardness and to maintain EC at a relatively high level simultaneously, but solid solution strengthening and work hardening are two inferior strengthening methods.
TianYZ, ZhangZF.Microstructures and tensile deformation behavior of Cu–16 wt.%Ag binary alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2009;508:209–213.
3.
FreudenbergerJ, GrünbergerW, BotcharovaE, Mechanical properties of Cu-based micro- and macrocomposites. Adv Eng Mater. 2002;4:677–681. doi: 10.1002/1527-2648(20020916)4:9<677::AID-ADEM677>3.0.CO;2-I
4.
BotcharovaE, FreudenbergerJ, SchultzL.Mechanical and electrical properties of mechanically alloyed nanocrystalline Cu–Nb alloys. Acta Mater. 2006;54:3333–3341. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.021
5.
CorreiaJB, DaviesHA, SellarsCM.Strengthening in rapidly solidified age hardened Cu–Cr and Cu–Cr–Zr alloys. Acta Mater. 1997;45:177–190. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00142-5
6.
IslamgalievRK, NesterovKM, BourgonJ, Nanostructured Cu–Cr alloy with high strength and electrical conductivity. J Appl Phys. 2014;115:194301. doi: 10.1063/1.4874655
7.
NagarjunaS, BalasubramanianK, SarmaDS.Effect of prior cold work on mechanical properties, electrical conductivity and microstructure of aged Cu–Ti alloys. J Mater Sci. 1999;34:2929–2942. doi: 10.1023/A:1004603906359
8.
SoffaWA, LaughlinDE.High-strength age hardening copper-titanium alloys: redivivus. Prog Mater Sci. 2004;49:347–366. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6425(03)00029-X
9.
SemboshiS, NishidaT, NumakuraH, Effects of aging temperature on electrical conductivity and hardness of Cu–3 at. pct Ti alloy aged in a hydrogen atmosphere. Metall Mater Trans A. 2011;42:2136–2143. doi: 10.1007/s11661-011-0637-8
10.
RaabeD, OhsakiS, HonoK.Mechanical alloying and amorphization in Cu–Nb–Ag in situ composite wires studied by transmission electron microscopy and atom probe tomography. Acta Mater. 2009;57:5254–5263. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.028
11.
VinogradovA, PatlanV, SuzukiY, Structure and properties of ultra-fine grain Cu–Cr–Zr alloy produced by equal-channel angular pressing. Acta Mater. 2002;50:1639–1651. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00437-2
12.
QiWX, TuJP, LiuF, Microstructure and tribological behavior of a peak aged Cu–Cr–Zr alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2003;343:89–96. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00387-8
13.
LuL, ShenYF, ChenXH, Ultrahigh strength and high electrical conductivity in copper. Science. 2004;304:422–426. doi: 10.1126/science.1092905
14.
LiuP, SuJH, DongQM, Optimization of aging treatment in lead frame copper alloy by intelligent technique. Mater Lett. 2005;59:3337–3342. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.05.069
15.
WeiKX, WeiW, WangF, Microstructure, mechanical properties and electrical conductivity of industrial Cu–0.5%Cr alloy processed by severe plastic deformation. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011;528:1478–1484. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.10.059
16.
GuoMX, ShenK, WangMP.Relationship between microstructure, properties and reaction conditions for Cu–TiB2 alloys prepared by in situ reaction. Acta Mater. 2009;57:4568–4579. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.030
17.
ZouCL, KangHJ, WangW, Effect of La addition on the particle characteristics, mechanical and electrical properties of in situ Cu–TiB2 composites. J Alloys Compd. 2016;687:312–319. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.06.129
18.
JiangYH, LiD, LiangSH, Phase selection of titanium boride in copper matrix composites during solidification. J Mater Sci. 2017;52:2957–2963. doi: 10.1007/s10853-016-0592-2
19.
LiYS, TaoNR, LuK.Microstructural evolution and nanostructure formation in copper during dynamic plastic deformation at cryogenic temperatures. Acta Mater. 2008;56:230–241. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.09.020
20.
SuryanarayananR, FreyCA, SastryML.Mechanical properties of nanocrystalline copper produced by solution-phase synthesis. J Mater Res. 1996;11:439–448. doi: 10.1557/JMR.1996.0053
21.
MaxwellJC.A treatise on electricity and magnetism. 3rd ed. New York ( NY): Dover; 1954. p. 435.
22.
RahmanM, WangCC, ChenWH, Electrical resistivity of titanium diboride and zirconium diboride. J Am Ceram Soc. 1995;78:1380–1382. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08498.x
23.
MeckingH, KocksUF.Kinetics of flow and strain-hardening. Acta Metall. 1981;29:1865–1875. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(81)90112-7
24.
KavehM, WiserN.Electrical resistivity of dislocations in metals. J Phys F Metal Phys. 1983;13:953–961. doi: 10.1088/0305-4608/13/5/009
