Results of corrosion tests of titanium in the initial state and after treatment using pulsed magnetic field are presented. It is shown that samples after treatment have better corrosion resistance due to the formation of denser and finer corrosion products with better adhesion to the substrate. Samples after treatment have more homogeneous microstructure due to a substantial increase of dislocations which are uniformly distributed. Mechanisms of dislocation multiplication and a model explaining the effect of the treatment on the corrosion are discussed.
This paper is part of a themed issue on Materials in External Fields.
Di CarloF, CassinelliC, MorraM, Corrosion of titanium in presence of dental amalgams and fluorides. Minerva Stomatol. 2003;52:111–121.
2.
SchiffN, BoinetM, MorgonL, Galvanic corrosion between orthodontic wires and brackets in fluoride mouthwashes. Eur J Orthodont. 2006;28:298–304. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji102
3.
KanekoK, YokoyamaK, MoriyamaK, Delayed fracture of beta titanium orthodontic wire in fluoride aqueous solutions. Biomaterials. 2003;24:2113–2120. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00642-7
4.
NakagawaM, MatsuyaS, UdohK. Corrosion behavior of pure titanium and titanium alloys in fluoride-containing solutions. Dent Mater J. 2001;20:305–314. doi: 10.4012/dmj.20.305
5.
HarwoodJJ. The influence of stress on corrosion (Part 1 of Two Parts). Corrosion. 1950;6:249–259. doi: 10.5006/0010-9312-6.8.249
6.
TakakuwaO, SoyamaH. Effect of residual stress on the corrosion behavior of austenitic stainless steel. Adv Chem Eng Sci. 2015;5:62–71. doi: 10.4236/aces.2015.51007
7.
KlameckiBE. Residual stress reduction by pulsed magnetic treatment. J Mater Process Technol. 2003;141:385–394. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00387-X
8.
TangF, LuAL, MeiJF, Research on residual stress reduction by a low frequency alternating magnetic field. J Mater Process Technol. 1998;74:255–258. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00279-3
9.
CaiZP, LinJA, ZhouLA, Evaluation of effect of magnetostriction on residual stress relief by pulsed magnetic treatment. Mater Sci Technol. 2004;20:1563–1566. doi: 10.1179/026708304X4286
10.
WuS, ZhaoHY, LuAL, Micro mechanism of reducing residual stress by low frequency alternating magnetic treatment. Trans China Weld Inst. 2002;23:10–11.
11.
StepanovGV, BabutskiiAI, MameyevIA, Experimental evaluation of pulse electric current effect on residual stresses in composite-to-copper joints. Strength Mater. 2008;40:452–457. doi: 10.1007/s11223-008-9055-6
12.
BabutskyA, ChrysanthouA, IoannouJ. Influence of pulsed electric current treatment on corrosion of structural metals. Strength Mater. 2009;41:487–491.
13.
KruszkaL, BabutskyA, ChrysanthouA, Effect of pulsed electric current treatment on the corrosion and strength of reinforcing steel. Mater Sci Forum. 2012;706–709:937–944.
14.
FangB, WangJ, XiaoS, Stress corrosion cracking of X-70 pipeline steels by eletropulsing treatment in near-neutral pH solution. J Mater Sci. 2005;40:6545–6552. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-1813-2
15.
LiuY, WangL, LiuH, Effect of electropulsing treatment on corrosion behavior of nickel base corrosion-resistant alloy. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2011;21:1970–1975. doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(11)60958-8
16.
BaranovYV, TroitskiiOV, AvraamovYS, Electroplastical deformation of metals, Chap. 1. In: Physical bases of electric-pulse and electroplastic treatments and new materials; Moscow: MGIU; 2001. p. 56–77.
17.
JangJ. Estimation of residual stress by instrumented indentation: a review. J Ceram Process Res. 2009;10:391–400.
18.
WuS, ZhaoH, AnliL, A micro-mechanism model of residual stress reduction by low frequency alternating magnetic field treatment. J Mater Process Technol. 2003;132:198–202. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00915-9
19.
MaL, ZhaoW, LiangZ, An investigation on the mechanical property changing mechanism of high speed steel by pulsed magnetic treatment. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014;609:16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.04.100
20.
ChristyRW, PytteA. The structure of matter: an introduction to modern physics. New York, Amsterdam: W.A. Benjamin Inc; 1965.
PerezN. Electrochemistry, Chap. 2. In: Electrochemistry and corrosion science; New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004. p. 27–70.
23.
BardalE. Different forms of corrosion classified on the basis of appearance, Chap. 7. In: DerbyB., editor. Corrosion and protection; London, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2004. p. 89–192.
24.
RaoAG, KatkarVA, GunasekaranG, Effect of multipass friction stir processing on corrosion resistance of hypereutectic Al–30Si alloy. Corros Sci. 2014;83:198–208. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.02.013
25.
ZhangZ, YangS, LvP, The microstructures and corrosion properties of polycrystalline copper induced by high-current pulsed electron beam. Appl Surf Sci. 2014;294:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.12.178
26.
KimJ, ParkSS, ParkHW. Corrosion inhibition and surface hardening of KP1 and KP4 mold steels using pulsed electron beam treatment. Corros Sci. 2014;89:179–188. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.08.018
27.
KimJ, ParkHW. Influence of a large pulsed electron beam (LPEB) on the corrosion resistance of Ti–6Al–7Nb alloys. Corros Sci. 2015;90:153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.10.008
28.
MiyamotoH, HaradaK, MimakiT, Corrosion of ultra-fine grained copper fabricated by equal-channel angular pressing. Corros Sci. 2008;50:1215–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.01.024
