Effects of reheating rate and holding time during tempering on microstructure and properties of a 960-MPa-grade low-alloy steel were investigated. Different reheating rates from 1 to 300 K s−1 and holding time from 5 to 1200 s on tempering at 823 K were carried out. The combination of high reheating rate and short holding time is obviously beneficial forgetting more uniformly distributed and refined carbides, which are believed to contribute to the high strength and high toughness. Yield strength of 960 MPa with elongation of ∼16 and impact toughness of 76 J (half size specimen) at 233 K was obtained by induction reheating tempering at 823 K for 5 s at a rate of 373 K s−1.
LiX. C., XieZ. J., WangX. L., WangX. M. and ShangC. J.: ‘Split fracture phenomenon and mechanism in tensile tests of high strength low carbon bainitic steel’, Acta Metall. Sinica, 2013, 49, 167–174. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2012.00545
2.
YusaS., HaraT., TsuzakiK. and TakahashiT.: ‘Refinement of grain boundary cementite in medium-carbon tempered martensite by thermomechanical processing’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1999, 273–275, 462–465. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00328-7
3.
AkihideN., TakayukiI. and TadashiO.: ‘Development of YP 960 and 1 100 MPa class ultra high strength steel plates with excellent toughness and high resistance to delayed fracture for construction and industrial machinery’, JFE GIHO, 2007, 18, 29–34.
4.
HahnG. T.: ‘The influence of microstructure on brittle fracture toughness’, Metall. Trans. A, 1984, 15, 947–959. doi: 10.1007/BF02644685
5.
LeapM. J. and WingertJ. C.: ‘The effects of grain-refining precipitates on the development of toughness in 4340 steel’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1999, 30, 93–114. doi: 10.1007/s11661-999-0198-2
6.
Rodriguez-IbabeJ. M.: ‘The role of microstructure in toughness behaviour of microalloyed steels’, Mater. Sci. Forum, 1998, 284–286, 51–62. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.284-286.51
7.
BaraniA. A., LiF. and RomanoP.: ‘Design of high-strength steels by microalloying and thermomechanical treatment’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2007, 463, 138–146. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.08.124
8.
FuruharaT., KobayashiK. and MakiT.: ‘Control of cementite precipitation in lath martensite by rapid heating and tempering’, ISIJ Int., 2004, 44, 1937–1944. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.44.1937
9.
RevillaC., UrangaP., LopezB. and Rodriguez-IbabeJ. M.: ‘Control of carbide distributions by modifying heating rates in induction tempering treatments’, Materials Science and Technology Conference on ‘Steel product metallurgy and applications’, Pittsburgh, USA, October 2012, 1069–1076.
10.
ReviallC., LópezB. and Rodriguez-IbabeJ. M.: ‘Carbide size refinement by controlling the heating rate during induction tempering in a low alloy steel’, Mater. Des., 2014, 62, 296–304. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.053
11.
BhadeshiaH. K. D. H. and HoneycombeR.: ‘Steels: Microstructure and properties’, 3rd edn, 95; 2006, London, Butterworth-Heinemann.
12.
XieZ. J., FangY. P., HanG., GuoH., MisraR. D. K. and ShangC. J.: ‘Structure–property relationship in a 960 MPa grade ultrahigh strength low carbon niobium–vanadium microalloyed steel: The significance of high frequency induction tempering’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, 618, 112–117. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.08.072
13.
MoritoS., NishikawaJ. and MakiT.: ‘Dislocation density within lath martensite in Fe–C and Fe–Ni alloys’, ISIJ Int., 2003, 43, 1475–1477. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.43.1475
14.
ClemmP. J. and FisherJ. C.: ‘The influence of grain boundaries on the nucleation of secondary phases’, Acta Metall., 1955, 3, 70–73. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(55)90014-6
FuruharaT., ShimohataS., WadaK. and MakiT.: ‘Effect of ferrite substructure on precipitation of Fe3C at MnS in an ultra-low carbon steel’, Tetsu-to-Hagané, 1994, 89, 318–323.
17.
KramerJ. J., PoundG. M. and MehlR. F.: ‘The free energy of formation and the interfacial enthalpy in pearlite’, Acta Metall., 1958, 6, 763–771. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(58)90051-8
18.
NatanzonE. I. and GlinerR. E.: ‘Use of induction heat treatment at the Gor'ky Truck Plant’, Met. Sci. Heat Treat., 1987, 29, (8), 571–573. doi: 10.1007/BF00763108
19.
GrumJ.: ‘Analysis of residual stresses in main crankshaft bearings after induction surface hardening and finish grinding’, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. D: J. Aut. Eng., 2003, 217, 173–182. doi: 10.1243/09544070360550282
20.
NamW. J. and KimD. S.: ‘Effects of alloying elements on microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of induction quenched-and-tempered steels’, J. Mater. Sci., 2003, 38, 3611–3617. doi: 10.1023/A:1025625330442
21.
HayakawaM., MatsuokaS., TsuzakiK., HanadaH. and SugisakiM.: ‘Atomic force microscopy of induction-and furnace-heating-tempered prestressed steels with different delayed fracture properties’, Scr. Mater., 2002, 47, 655–661. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00263-4
