In this work, plasma electrolytic oxidation coating was formed on aluminium alloy in a cheap and inexpensive electrolyte to improve its wear resistance. It was found the micro-hardness of coatings increased first and then decreased with increasing the oxidised time. It was showed that the specimen treated under the time of 35 minutes exhibited the highest micro-hardness and lowest wear loss. The surface and cross-sectional morphology indicated that the coatings have a dense structure with low porosity. The presence of wear scars on the worn surface morphology demonstrates that the three-body rolling was the main wear mechanism for coated specimen. X-ray diffraction results showed the coating was formed mainly from α-Al2O3 and γ-Al2O3.
WenL., WangY. M., ZhouY., OuyangJ. H., GuoL. X. and JiaD. C.: ‘Corrosion evaluation of microarc oxidation coatings formed on 2024 aluminium alloy’, Corros. Sci., 2010, 52, 2687–2696. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.04.022
2.
DingH. Y., DaiZ. D., SkuiryS. C. and HuiD.: ‘Corrosion wear behaviors of micro-arc oxidation coating of Al2O3 on 2024Al in different aqueous environments at fretting contact’, Tribol. Int., 2010, 43, 868–875. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2009.12.022
3.
MalayogluU., TekinK. C. and ShresthaS.: ‘An investigation into the mechanical and tribological properties of plasma electrolytic oxidation and hard-anodized coatings on 6082 aluminum alloy’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, 528, 7451–7460. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.06.032
4.
TofighA. A. and ShabaniM. O.: ‘Efficient optimum solution for high strength Al alloys matrix composites’, Ceram. Int., 2013, 39, 7483–7490. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.02.097
5.
MazaheryA., AlizadehM. and ShabaniM. O.: ‘Study of tribological and mechanical properties of A356-nano SiC composites’, Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 2012, 65, 393–398. doi: 10.1007/s12666-012-0143-8
6.
RahimipourM. R., TofighA. A., MazaheryA. and ShabaniM. O.: ‘Strategic developments to improve the optimization performance with efficient optimum solution and produce high wear resistance aluminum–copper alloy matrix composites’, Neural Comput. Appl., 2014, 24, 1531–1538. doi: 10.1007/s00521-013-1375-1
7.
ShabaniM. O. and MazaheryA.: ‘Fabrication of AMCs by spray forming: setting of cognition and social parameters to accelerate the convergence in optimization of spray forming process’, Ceram. Int., 2013, 39, 5271–5279. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.12.028
8.
MazaheryA. and ShabaniM. O.: ‘Development of the principle of simulated natural evolution in searching for a more superior solution: proper selection of processing parameters in AMCs’, Powder Technol., 2013, 245, 146–155. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.04.035
9.
SongR. G., WangC., JiangY., LiH., LuG. and WangZ. X.: ‘Microstructure and properties of Al2O3/TiO2 nanostructured ceramic composite coatings prepared by plasma spraying’, J. Alloys Compd., 2012, 544, 13–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.07.032
10.
TangM. Q., LiW. P., LiuH. C. and ZhuaL.Q.: ‘Preparation Al2O3/ZrO2 composite coating in an alkaline phosphate electrolyte containing K2ZrF6 on aluminum alloy by microarc oxidation’, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2012, 258, 5869–5875. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.02.124
11.
LiH. X., SongR. G. and JiZ. G.: ‘Effects of nano-additive TiO2 on performance of micro-arc oxidation coatings formed on 6063 aluminum alloy’, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2013, 23, 406–411. doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62477-2
12.
LimT. S., RyuH. S. and HongS. H.: ‘Electrochemical corrosion properties of CeO2-containing coatings on AZ31 magnesium alloys prepared by plasma electrolytic oxidation’, Corros. Sci., 2012, 62, 104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.04.043
13.
XiangN., SongR. G., XiangB., LiH., WangZ. X. and WangC.: ‘A study on photocatalytic activity of micro-arc oxidation TiO2 films and Ag+/MAO–TiO2 composite films’, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 347, 454–460. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.136
14.
XiangN., ZhuangJ. J., SongR. G., XiangB., XiongY. and SuX. P.: ‘Fabrication and photocatalytic activity of MAO–TiO2 films formed on titanium doped with cations’, Mater. Technol.http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1753555715Y.0000000059.
JungY. C., ShinK. R., KoY. G. and ShinD. H.: ‘Surface characteristics and biological response of titanium oxide layer formed via micro-arc oxidation in K3PO4 and Na3PO4 electrolytes’, J. Alloys Compd., 2014, 586, S548–S552. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.01.060
17.
GhasemiA., RajaV. S., BlawertC., DietzelW. and KainerK. U.: ‘Study of the structure and corrosion behavior of PEO coatings on AM50 magnesium alloy by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2008, 202, 3513–3518. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.12.033
18.
ChengY. L., QinT. W., LiL. L., WangH. M. and ZhangZ.: ‘Comparison of corrosion resistance of microarc oxidation coatings prepared with different electrolyte concentrations on AM60 magnesium alloy’, Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2011, 46, 17–23. doi: 10.1179/174327809X409222
19.
YerokhinA. L., NieX., LeylandA. and MatthewsA.: ‘Characterisation of oxide films produced by plasma electrolytic oxidation of a Ti-6Al-4 V alloy’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2000, 130, 195–206. doi: 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00719-2
20.
LiH. X., LiW. J., SongR. G. and JiZ. G.: ‘Effects of different current densities on properties of MAO coatings embedded with and without α-Al2O3 nanoadditives’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2012, 28, 565–568. doi: 10.1179/1743284711Y.0000000084
21.
DehnaviV., LuanB. L., ShoesmithD. W., LiuX. Y. and RohaniS.: ‘Effect of duty cycle and applied current frequency on plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) coating growth behavior’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2013, 226, 100–107. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.03.041
22.
StojadinovicS., VasilicR., BelcaI., PetkovicM., KasalicaB., NedicZ. and ZekovicL.: ‘Characterization of the plasma electrolytic oxidation of aluminium in sodium tungstate’, Corros. Sci., 2010, 52, 3258–3265. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.05.042
23.
SabatiniG., CeschiniL., MartiniC., WilliamsJ. A. and HutchingsI. M.: ‘Improving sliding and abrasive wear behaviour of cast A356 and wrought AA7075 aluminium alloys by plasma electrolytic oxidation’, Mater. Des., 2010, 31, 816–828. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.07.053
