Aluminium foam core sandwich panels are good energy absorbers for impact protection applications, such as light-weight structural panels, packing materials and energy absorbing devices. In this study, the high-velocity impact perforation of aluminium foam core sandwich structures was analysed. Sandwich panels with 1100 aluminium face-sheets and closed-cell A356 aluminium alloy foam core were modelled by three-dimensional finite element models. The models were validated with experimental tests by comparing numerical and experimental damage modes, output velocity, ballistic limit and absorbed energy. By this model the influence of foam core and face-sheet thicknesses on the behaviour of the sandwich panel under impact perforation was evaluated.
AshbyM. F., EvansA., FleckN. A., GibsonL. J., HutchinsonJ. W. and WadleyH. N. G.: ‘Metal foams – a design guide’, 2000, London, Butterworth-Heinemann.
2.
BanhartJ.: ‘Manufacture, characterization and application of cellular metals and metallic foams’, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2001, 46, 559–632. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5
3.
DegischerH. P. and KrisztB.: ‘Handbook of cellular metals’, 2002, Weinheim, Wiley-VCH.
4.
MinesR. A. W., RoachA. M. and JonesN.: ‘High velocity perforation behaviour of polymer composite laminates’, Int. J. Impact Eng., 1999, 22, 561–588. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00019-6
5.
ReidS. R. and ZhouG.: ‘Impact behaviour of fibre-reinforced composite materials and structures’, 2000, Cambridge, Woodhead Publisher Ltd.
6.
CompstonP., CantwellW. J., JonesC. and JonesN.: ‘Impact perforation resistance and fracture mechanisms of a thermoplastic based fiber-metal laminate’, J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 2001, 20, 597–599. doi: 10.1023/A:1010904930497
7.
GrujicicM., PanduranganB., ZhaoC. L., BiggersS. B. and MorganD. R.: ‘Hypervelocity impact resistance of reinforced carbon–carbon/carbon–foam thermal protection systems’, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2006, 252, 5035–5050. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.07.047
8.
BuitragoB. L., Garcia-CastilloS. K. and BarberoE.: ‘Experimental analysis of perforation of glass/polyester structures subjected to high-velocity impact’, Mater. Lett., 2010, 64, 1052–1054. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2010.02.007
9.
IvanezI., SantiusteC., BarberoE. and Sanchez-SaezS.: ‘Numerical modelling of foam-cored sandwich plates under high-velocity impact’, Compos. Struct., 2011, 93, 2392–2399. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.028
10.
HassanM. Z. and CantwellW. J.: ‘The influence of core properties on the perforation resistance of sandwich structures – an experimental study’, Compos. Part B-Eng., 2012, 43, 3231–3238. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.012
11.
RamadhanA. A., Abu TalibA. R., Mohd RafieA. S. and ZahariR.: ‘High velocity impact response of Kevlar-29/epoxy and 6061-T6 aluminum laminated panels’, Mater. Design, 2013, 43, 307–321. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.034
12.
NasirzadehR. and SabetA. R.: ‘Study of foam density variations in composite sandwich panels under high velocity impact loading’, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2014, 63, 129–139. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.08.009
13.
Reyes VillanuevaG. and CantwellW. J.: ‘The high velocity impact response of composite and FML-reinforced sandwich structures’, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2004, 64, 35–54. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00197-0
14.
HanssenA. G., GirardY., OlovssonL., BerstadT. and LangsethM.: ‘A numerical model for bird strike of aluminium foam-based sandwich panels’, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2006, 32, 1127–1144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.004
15.
RadfordD. D., McShaneG. J., DeshpandeV. S. and FleckN. A.: ‘The response of clamped sandwich plates with metallic foam cores to simulated blast loading’, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2006, 43, 2243–2259. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.07.006
16.
JingL., WangZ., NingJ. and ZhaoL.: ‘The dynamic response of sandwich beams with open-cell metal foam cores’, Compos. Part B-Eng., 2011, 42, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.09.024
17.
QiC., YangS., YangL. J., WeiZ. Y. and LuZ. H.: ‘Blast resistance and multi-objective optimization of aluminum foam-cored sandwich panels’, Compos. Struct., 2013, 105, 45–57. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.04.043
18.
Alvandi-TabriziY., WhislerD. A., KimH. and RabieiA.: ‘High strain rate behavior of composite metal foams’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct., 2015, 631, 248–257. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.02.027
19.
MyersK., KatonaB., CortesP. and OrbulovI. N.: ‘Quasi-static and high strain rate response of aluminum matrix syntactic foams under compression’, Compos. Part A-Appl. Sci. Manuf., 2015, 79, 82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.09.018
20.
LuongD. D., ShunmugasamyV. C., GuptaN., LehmhusD., WeiseJ. and BaumeisterJ.: ‘Quasi-static and high strain rates compressive response of iron and Invar matrix syntactic foams’, Mater. Design, 2015, 66, 516–531. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.030
21.
OmarM. Y., XiangC., GuptaN., StrbikO. M.III and ChoK.: ‘Syntactic foam core metal matrix sandwich composite: compressive properties and strain rate effects’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct., 2015, 643, 156–168. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.07.033
22.
GolestanipourM., Amini MashhadiH., AbraviM. S., MalekjafarianM. and SadeghianM. H.: ‘Manufacturing of Al/SiCp composite foams using calcium carbonate as foaming agent’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2011, 27, 923–927. doi: 10.1179/026708310X12677993662168
23.
HanssenA. G., HopperstadO. S., LangsethM. and IlstadH.: ‘Validation of constitutive models applicable to aluminium foams’, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2002, 44, 359–406. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00091-1
24.
ABAQUS/Analysis user's manual, Vol. III, version 6.10, Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen Inc. 20.3.5-1-11, 2010.
25.
DeshpandeV. S. and FleckN. A.: ‘Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams’, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2000, 48, 1253–1283. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00082-4
26.
MillerR. E.: ‘A continuum plasticity model for the constitutive and indentation behaviour of foamed metals’, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2000, 42, 729–754. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7403(99)00021-1
27.
SchreyerH. L., ZuoQ. H. and MajiA. K.: ‘Anisotropic plasticity model for foams and honeycombs’, J. Eng. Mech., 1994, 120, 1913–1930. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:9(1913)
28.
ZhaoH., ElnasriI. and GirardY.: ‘Perforation of aluminium foam core sandwich panels under impact loading – an experimental study’, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2007, 34, 1246–1257. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.06.011
29.
HouW., ZhuF., LuG. and FangD.: ‘Ballistic impact experiments of metallic sandwich panels with aluminium foam core’, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2010, 37, 1045–1055. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.03.006
30.
RuanD., LuG. and WongY. C.: ‘Quasi-static indentation tests on aluminium foam sandwich panels’, Compos. Struct., 2010, 92, 2039–2046. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.014
31.
RajR. E., ParameswaranV. and DanielB. S. S.: ‘Comparison of quasi-static and dynamic compression behavior of closed-cell aluminum foam’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct., 2009, 526, 11–15. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.07.017
