We must aim for a community of compassion in which each recognises the tragic aspects of the other. We must cope with the problem of recreating our history in such a way that it becomes indistinguishable from an invention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerkoffS. (1994). Steven Berkoff: PlaysLondon: Faber & Faber.
2.
BoalA. (1992). Games for Actors and Non-Actors.London: Routledge.
3.
BowlbyJ. (1988). A Secure Base: Clinical applications of Attachment theory.London: Routledge.
4.
FoshaD. (2003). ‘Dyadic regulation and experiential work with emotion and relatedness in trauma and disorganized attachment’. Healing Trauma: Attachment, Mind, Body and Brain.SolomonM.SiegalD.New York: W.W. Norton221–81.
5.
GeorgeC.KaplanN.MainM. (1996). Adult Attachment Interview protocolUniversity of California at Berkeley (3rd ed.). Unpublished manuscript.
6.
GerhardtS. (2004). Why Love Matters.London: Brunner Routledge.
KeatleyC. (1997). My Mother Said I Never ShouldOxford: Methuen.
10.
MainM. (1991). Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring and singular (coherent) vs multiple (incoherent) model of attachment. Findings and Directions for future research. Attachment Across the Life CycleColinMurray ParkesStevenson-HindeJoanMarrisPeterLondon: Routledge.
11.
MainM.GoldwynR. (1984). ‘Predicting rejection of her infant from mother's representation of her own experience: implications for the abused-abusing inter-generational cycle.’. Child Abuse and Neglect8, 203–17.
12.
Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical PrinciplesDefinitions1988.
13.
The International Attachment Network, 1 Fairbridge Road, London N19 3EW Telephone and Facsimile 020 7281 4441Email iattachnet@yahoo.co.uk Website: www.attachmentnetwork.org.
14.
WilshireB. (1982). Role Playing & Identity: the limits of theatre as metaphorBloomington: Indiana University Press.
