Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018-01
The relation of sensitivity to provocation and frustration to direct aggression: the mediating role of beliefs about aggression / La relación entre la sensibilidad a la provocación y a la frustración y la agresión directa: el papel mediador de las creencias sobre la agresión
Previous research has suggested that sensitivity to provocation and frustration differently predict aggressive behaviour. In the study reported in this paper, two potential mediators of the relationships among both sensitivities and self-reported aggression were examined, namely instrumental and expressive beliefs about aggression. A sample of 318 participants (52% men) took part in the study. Structural Equation Modeling demonstrated that sensitivity to provocation was related to both types of beliefs about aggression, whereas sensitivity to frustration was associated with expressive beliefs. However, only instrumental beliefs mediated the relationship between sensitivity to provocation and both physical and verbal aggression. Analysed variables predicted 46% of the variance in physical aggression and 11% of the variance in verbal aggression. Additionally, men reported higher physical aggression and endorsed more instrumental beliefs than women. Implications for understanding emotional and cognitive mechanisms involved in regulation of aggression are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderF.AllenC.BrooksJ.ColeC.CampbellA. (2004). Reason to believe: Representations of aggression as phenomenological read-out. Sex Roles, 51, 647–659. doi:10.1007/s11199-004-0716-z
2.
AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231
3.
ArcherJ. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651
4.
ArcherJ. (2004a). Which attitudinal measures predict trait aggression?Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 47–60. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00050-3
5.
ArcherJ. (2004b). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A Meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291
6.
ArcherJ. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 249–266. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09990951
7.
ArcherJ.Graham-KevanN. (2003). Do beliefs about aggression predict physical aggression to partners?Aggressive Behavior, 29, 41–54. doi:10.1002/ab.10029
8.
ArcherJ.HaighA. (1997). Beliefs about aggression among male and female prisoners. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 405–415. doi:10.1002/(SICI)10982337(1997)23:6<405::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-F
9.
ArcherJ.WebbI. A. (2006). The relation between scores on the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire and aggressive acts, impulsiveness, competitiveness, dominance, and sexual jealousy. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 464–473. doi:10.1002/ab.20146
10.
BabcockJ. C.TharpA. L. T.SharpC.HeppnerW.StanfordM. S. (2014). Similarities and differences in impulsive/premeditated and reactive/proactive bimodal classifications of aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 251–262. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.04.002
BerkowitzL. (1990). On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression: A cognitive neoassociationistic analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 45, 494–503. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.494
13.
BerkowitzL. (2012). A different view of anger: The cognitive‐neoassociation conception of the relation of anger to aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 322–333. doi:10.1002/ab.21432
14.
BerkowitzL.Harmon-JonesE. (2004). Toward an understanding of the determinants of anger. Emotion, 4, 107–130. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.107
15.
BettencourtB.TalleyA.BenjaminA.ValentineJ. (2006). Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 751–777. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.751
16.
BjörkqvistK. (1994). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30, 177–188. doi:10.1007/BF01420988
17.
BlogowskaJ.LambertC.SaroglouV. (2013). Religious prosociality and aggression: It’s real. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52, 524–536. doi:10.1111/jssr.12048
18.
BussA. H.PerryM. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452–459. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452
19.
CampbellA.MuncerS. (2008). Intent to harm or injure? Gender and the expression of anger. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 282–293. doi:10.1002/ab.20228
20.
CampbellA.MuncerS.CoyleE. (1992). Social representation of aggression as an explanation of gender differences: A preliminary study. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 95–108. doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1992)18:2<95::AID-AB2480180203>3.0.CO;2-5
21.
CampbellA.MuncerS.GormanB. (1993). Gender and Social and social representations of aggression: A communal-agentic analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 19, 95–108. doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1993)19:2<125::AID-AB2480190205>3.0.CO;2-1
22.
CampbellA.MuncerS.GuyA.BanimM. (1996). Social representations of aggression: Crossing the sex barrier. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 1–13. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199601)26:1<135::AID-EJSP744>3.0.CO
23.
CampbellA.MuncerS.McManusI. C.WoodhouseD. (1999). Instrumental and expressive representations of aggression: One scale or two?Aggressive Behavior, 25, 435–444. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)25:6<435::AID-AB4>3.0.CO;2-Q
24.
CapraraG. V.AlessandriG.TisakM. S.PacielloM.CapraraM. G.GerbinoM.FontaineR. G. (2013). Individual differences in personality conducive to engagement in aggression and violence. European Journal of Personality, 27, 290–303. doi:10.1002/per.1855
25.
CardN. A.StuckyB. D.SawalaniG. M.LittleT. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta‐analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185–1229. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x
26.
Dominiak‐KochanekM.KonopkaK.RutkowskaM.FrączekA.RamirezJ. M. (2016). Direct and indirect effects of parenting practices on socio‐moral approval of aggression in Polish young adults. Do all practices matter?International Journal of Psychology. doi:10.1002/ijop.12372
27.
DonahueJ. J.GoransonA. C.McClureK. S.Van MaleL. M. (2014). Emotion dysregulation, negative affect, and aggression: A moderated, multiple mediator analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 23–28. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.009
28.
DriscollH.ZinkivskayA.EvansK.CampbellA. (2006). Gender differences in social representations of aggression: The phenomenological experience of differences in inhibitory control?British Journal of Psychology, 97, 139–153. doi:10.1348/000712605X63073
29.
ForbushK.WatsonD. (2006). Emotional inhibition and personality traits: A comparison of women with anorexia, bulimia, and normal controls. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 18, 115–121. doi:10.1080/10401230600614637
30.
GierowskiJ. K.CyboranM.PoranskaA. (2008). Relationship between coherence and aggression, taking into account psychological gender, in Juvenile girls and boys. Problems of Forensic Sciences, 74, 121–149.
31.
GilbertF.DaffernM.TalevskiD.OgloffJ. R. P. (2013). The role of aggression-related cognition in the aggressive behavior of offenders. A general aggression model perspective. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 119–138. doi:10.1177/0093854812467943
LawrenceC. (2006). Measuring individual responses to aggression-triggering events: Development of the situational triggers of aggressive responses (STAR) scale. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 241–252. doi:10.1002/ab.20122
34.
LawrenceC.HutchinsonL. (2012). The influence of individual differences in sensitivity to provocations on provoked aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 212–221. doi:10.1002/ab.21473
35.
McAuliffeM. D.HubbardJ. A.RubinR. M.MorrowM. T.DearingK. F. (2006). Reactive and proactive aggression: Stability of constructs and relations to correlates. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167, 365–382. doi:10.3200/GNTP.167.4.365-382
36.
MillanaL.RamirezJ. M. (2011). Justification of aggression in young reoffenders. The Open Criminology Journal, 4, 61–70. doi:10.1177/0265407597144002
37.
MuncerS.CampbellA. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis and the structure of Expagg in context: A reply to Forrest et al. (2000). Aggressive Behavior, 30, 146–157. doi:10.1002/ab.20011
38.
MuncerS.CampbellA.JervisV.LewisR. (2001). Ladettes, social representations and aggression. Sex Roles, 44, 33–44. doi:10.1023/A:1011033832413
39.
PoulinF.BoivinM. (2000). Reactive and proactive aggression: Evidence of a two factor model. Psychological Assessment, 12, 115–122. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.2.115
40.
RaineA.DodgeK.LoeberR.Gatzke-KoppL.LynamD.ReynoldsC.LiuJ. (2006). The reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 159–171. doi:10.1002/ab.20115
41.
RamirezJ. M.AndreuJ. M.FujiharaT. (2001). Cultural and sex differences in aggression: A comparison between Japanese and Spanish students using two different inventories. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 313–322. doi:10.1002/ab.1014
42.
ReyesH. L. M.FosheeV. A.NiolonP. H.ReidyD. E.HallJ. E. (2016). Gender role attitudes and male adolescent dating violence perpetration: Normative beliefs as moderators. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 350–360. doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0278-0
43.
RussaM. B.RodriguezC. M.SilviaP. J. (2014). Frustration influences impact of history and disciplinary attitudes on physical discipline decision making. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 1–11. doi:10.1002/ab.21500
44.
SchwartzS. H.RubelT. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010–1028. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010
45.
ScuteriA.ParsonsD.ChesneyM. A.AndersonD. E. (2001). Anger inhibition potentiates the association of high end-tidal CO2 with blood pressure in women. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63, 470–475. doi:10.1097/00006842-200105000-00017
46.
SkripkauskaiteS.HawkS. T.BranjeS. J.KootH. M.Van LierP. A.MeeusW. (2015). Reactive and proactive aggression: Differential links with emotion regulation difficulties, maternal criticism in adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 41, 214–226. doi:10.1002/ab.21583
47.
SmithP.WatermanM. (2006). Self-reported aggression and impulsivity in forensic and non-forensic populations: The role of gender and experience. Journal of Family Violence, 21, 425–437. doi:10.1007/s10896-006-9039-x
48.
WrightM. F.LiY. (2013). Normative beliefs about aggression and cyber aggression among young adults: A longitudinal investigation. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 161–170. doi:10.1002/ab.21470
49.
YamagishiT.HashimotoH.SchugJ. (2008). Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science, 19, 579–584. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02126.x
50.
ZajenkowskaA.JankowskiK. S.LawrenceC.ZajenkowskiM. (2013). Personality and individual differences in responses to aggression triggering events among prisoners and non-prisoners. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 947–951. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.467
51.
ZajenkowskaA.MylonasK.LawrenceC.KonopkaK.RajchertJ. (2014). Cross -cultural sex differences in situational triggers of aggressive responses. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 355–363. doi:10.1002/ijop.12052
