Analysis of the changing relationship between peer acceptance and academic achievement in adolescents / Análisis de la relación variable entre la aceptación entre iguales y el rendimiento académico de los adolescentes

Abstract

Spanish

Peer interactions in the context of group-level relationships have significant consequences on social adjustment across the lifespan of children and adolescents. Indeed, peer relations change systematically with individuals’ development. This study examined the effect of positive peer interactions measured as peer acceptance on academic achievement during the adolescence developmental stage. Participants were 766 students aged 11–16 years old. Adolescents completed a sociometric measure of peer acceptance. Academic achievement data were obtained from students’ report card grades. Regression analyses indicated that peer acceptance predicted academic achievement, and also a moderation effect was found displaying a higher impact of peer acceptance on academic achievement for younger adolescents than for older adolescents. It is suggested that improving peer relationships within the group, especially at early adolescence, can be a target of intervention to improve academic functioning at school.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altermatt

E. R.

(2012). Children’s achievement-related discourse with peers: Uncovering the processes of peer influence. In Ryan

A. M.

Ladd

G. W.

(Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 135–164). Charlotte, NC: IAP.

Austin

A. M. B.

Draper

D. C.

(1984). The relationship among peer acceptance, social impact, and academic achievement in middle childhood. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 597–604. doi:10.3102/00028312021003597

Barrasa

Gil

(2004). Un programa informático para el cálculo y la representación de índices y valores sociométricos [A computer program for the evaluation and representation of sociometric indexes and values]. Psicothema, 16, 329–335.

Bellmore

(2011). Peer rejection and unpopularity: Associations with GPAs across the transition to middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 282–295. doi:10.1037/a0023312

Bierman

K. L.

Motamedi

(2015). Social-emotional programs for preschool children. In Durlak

Weissberg

Gullotta

(Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 135–150). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Bierman

K. L.

Nix

R. L.

Heinrichs

B. S.

Domitrovich

C. E.

Gest

S. D.

Welsh

J. A.

Gill

(2014). Effects of head start REDI on children’s outcomes one year later in different kindergarten contexts. Child Development, 85, 140–159. doi:10.1111/cdev.12117

Cillessen

A. H. N.

(2009). Sociometric methods. In Rubin

K. H.

Bukowski

W. M.

Laursen

(Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 82–99). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Cohen

West

S. G.

Aiken

L. S.

(2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Coie

J. D.

Dodge

K. A.

(1988). Multiple sources of data on social behavior and social status in the school: A cross-age comparison. Child Development Journal, 59, 815–829. doi:10.2307/1130578

10.

Frenz

Gresham

F. M.

Elliot

S. N.

(1991). Popular, controversial, neglected, and rejected adolescents: Contrasts of social competence and achievement differences. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 109–120. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(05)80003-2

11.

Furman

Buhrmester

(1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63, 103–115. doi:10.2307/1130905

12.

Gifford-Smith

M. E.

Brownell

C. A.

(2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 235–284. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(03)00048-7

13.

Kingery

J. N.

Erdley

C. A.

Marshall

K. C.

(2011). Peer acceptance and friendship as predictors of early adolescents’ adjustment across the middle school transition. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 57, 215–243. doi:10.1353/mpq.2011.0012

14.

Ladd

G. W.

(1990). Having friends, keeping friends, making friends, and being liked by peers in the classroom: Predictors of children’s early school adjustment? Child Development, 61, 1081–1100. doi:10.2307/1130877

15.

Lubers

M. J.

Van Der Werf

M. P. C.

Snijders

T. A. B.

Creemers

B. P. M.

Kuyper

(2006). The impact of peer relations on academic progress in junior high. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 491–512. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.07.005

16.

Marks

P. E. L.

Babcock

Cillessen

A. H. N.

Crick

N. R.

(2013). The effects of participation rate on the internal reliability of peer nomination measures. Social Development, 22, 609–622. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2012.00661.x

17.

Meijs

Cillessen

A. H. N.

(2010). Social intelligence and academic achievement as predictors of adolescent popularity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 62–72. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9373-9

18.

Newcomb

A. F.

Bukowski

W. M.

Pattee

(1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99–128. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.99

19.

Parker

J. G.

Asher

S. R.

(1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low accepted children “at risk?”. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357–389. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.102.3.357

20.

Phillipsen

L. C.

(1999). Associations between age, gender, and group acceptance and three components of friendship quality. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 438–464. doi:10.1177/0272431699019004002

21.

Prinstein

M. J.

(2007). Assessment of adolescents’ preference- and reputation-based peer status using sociometric experts. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 53, 243–261. doi:10.1353/mpq.2007.0013

22.

Rubin

K. H.

Bukowski

W. M.

Laursen

(2009). Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

23.

Schwartz

Gorman

A. H.

Nakamoto

McKay

(2006). Popularity, social acceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups: Links with academic performance and school attendance. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1116–1127. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1116

24.

Spinath

(2012). Academic achievement. In Ramachandran

V. S.

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (2nd ed., pp. 1–8). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

25.

Steinberg

(2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002

26.

Véronneau

M.-H.

Vitaro

Brendgen

Dishion

T. J.

Tremblay

R. E.

(2010). Transactional analysis of the reciprocal links between peer experiences and academic achievement from middle childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 46, 773–790. doi:10.1037/a0019816

27.

Wentzel

K. R.

(2003). Sociometric status and adjustment in middle school: A longitudinal study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23, 5–28. doi:10.1177/0272431602239128

28.

Wentzel

K. R.

(2009). Peers and academic functioning at school. In Rubin

K. H.

Bukowski

W. M.

Laursen

(Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 531–547). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

29.

Wentzel

K. R.

Caldwell

(1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198–1209. doi:10.2307/1132301

30.

Wentzel

K. R.

Donlan

Morrison

(2012). Peer relationships and motivation at school. In Ryan

A. M.

Ladd

G. W.

(Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 79–108). Charlotte, NC: IAP.

31.

Zettergren

(2003). School adjustment in adolescence for previously rejected, average and popular children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 207–221. doi:10.1348/00070990360626949