Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016-10
Analysis of the changing relationship between peer acceptance and academic achievement in adolescents / Análisis de la relación variable entre la aceptación entre iguales y el rendimiento académico de los adolescentes
Peer interactions in the context of group-level relationships have significant consequences on social adjustment across the lifespan of children and adolescents. Indeed, peer relations change systematically with individuals’ development. This study examined the effect of positive peer interactions measured as peer acceptance on academic achievement during the adolescence developmental stage. Participants were 766 students aged 11–16 years old. Adolescents completed a sociometric measure of peer acceptance. Academic achievement data were obtained from students’ report card grades. Regression analyses indicated that peer acceptance predicted academic achievement, and also a moderation effect was found displaying a higher impact of peer acceptance on academic achievement for younger adolescents than for older adolescents. It is suggested that improving peer relationships within the group, especially at early adolescence, can be a target of intervention to improve academic functioning at school.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltermattE. R. (2012). Children’s achievement-related discourse with peers: Uncovering the processes of peer influence. In RyanA. M.LaddG. W. (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 135–164). Charlotte, NC: IAP.
2.
AustinA. M. B.DraperD. C. (1984). The relationship among peer acceptance, social impact, and academic achievement in middle childhood. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 597–604. doi:10.3102/00028312021003597
3.
BarrasaA.GilF. (2004). Un programa informático para el cálculo y la representación de índices y valores sociométricos [A computer program for the evaluation and representation of sociometric indexes and values]. Psicothema, 16, 329–335.
4.
BellmoreA. (2011). Peer rejection and unpopularity: Associations with GPAs across the transition to middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 282–295. doi:10.1037/a0023312
5.
BiermanK. L.MotamediM. (2015). Social-emotional programs for preschool children. In DurlakJ.WeissbergR.GullottaT. (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 135–150). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
BiermanK. L.NixR. L.HeinrichsB. S.DomitrovichC. E.GestS. D.WelshJ. A.GillS. (2014). Effects of head start REDI on children’s outcomes one year later in different kindergarten contexts. Child Development, 85, 140–159. doi:10.1111/cdev.12117
7.
CillessenA. H. N. (2009). Sociometric methods. In RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.LaursenB. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 82–99). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
8.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
CoieJ. D.DodgeK. A. (1988). Multiple sources of data on social behavior and social status in the school: A cross-age comparison. Child Development Journal, 59, 815–829. doi:10.2307/1130578
10.
FrenzC.GreshamF. M.ElliotS. N. (1991). Popular, controversial, neglected, and rejected adolescents: Contrasts of social competence and achievement differences. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 109–120. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(05)80003-2
11.
FurmanW.BuhrmesterD. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63, 103–115. doi:10.2307/1130905
12.
Gifford-SmithM. E.BrownellC. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 235–284. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(03)00048-7
13.
KingeryJ. N.ErdleyC. A.MarshallK. C. (2011). Peer acceptance and friendship as predictors of early adolescents’ adjustment across the middle school transition. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 57, 215–243. doi:10.1353/mpq.2011.0012
14.
LaddG. W. (1990). Having friends, keeping friends, making friends, and being liked by peers in the classroom: Predictors of children’s early school adjustment?Child Development, 61, 1081–1100. doi:10.2307/1130877
15.
LubersM. J.Van Der WerfM. P. C.SnijdersT. A. B.CreemersB. P. M.KuyperH. (2006). The impact of peer relations on academic progress in junior high. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 491–512. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.07.005
16.
MarksP. E. L.BabcockB.CillessenA. H. N.CrickN. R. (2013). The effects of participation rate on the internal reliability of peer nomination measures. Social Development, 22, 609–622. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2012.00661.x
17.
MeijsN.CillessenA. H. N. (2010). Social intelligence and academic achievement as predictors of adolescent popularity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 62–72. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9373-9
18.
NewcombA. F.BukowskiW. M.PatteeL. (1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99–128. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.99
19.
ParkerJ. G.AsherS. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low accepted children “at risk?”. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357–389. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.102.3.357
20.
PhillipsenL. C. (1999). Associations between age, gender, and group acceptance and three components of friendship quality. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 438–464. doi:10.1177/0272431699019004002
21.
PrinsteinM. J. (2007). Assessment of adolescents’ preference- and reputation-based peer status using sociometric experts. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 53, 243–261. doi:10.1353/mpq.2007.0013
22.
RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.LaursenB. (2009). Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
SchwartzD.GormanA. H.NakamotoJ.McKayT. (2006). Popularity, social acceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups: Links with academic performance and school attendance. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1116–1127. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1116
24.
SpinathB. (2012). Academic achievement. In RamachandranV. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (2nd ed., pp. 1–8). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
SteinbergL. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002
26.
VéronneauM.-H.VitaroF.BrendgenM.DishionT. J.TremblayR. E. (2010). Transactional analysis of the reciprocal links between peer experiences and academic achievement from middle childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 46, 773–790. doi:10.1037/a0019816
27.
WentzelK. R. (2003). Sociometric status and adjustment in middle school: A longitudinal study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23, 5–28. doi:10.1177/0272431602239128
28.
WentzelK. R. (2009). Peers and academic functioning at school. In RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.LaursenB. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 531–547). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
WentzelK. R.CaldwellK. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198–1209. doi:10.2307/1132301
30.
WentzelK. R.DonlanA.MorrisonD. (2012). Peer relationships and motivation at school. In RyanA. M.LaddG. W. (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 79–108). Charlotte, NC: IAP.
31.
ZettergrenP. (2003). School adjustment in adolescence for previously rejected, average and popular children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 207–221. doi:10.1348/00070990360626949
