Determinants of approval of the work of truth commissions in the southern cone: a comparative study / Determinantes de la aprobación del trabajo realizado por las Comisiones de Verdad y Reconciliación en el cono sur: un estudio comparativo

Abstract

Spanish

The socio-demographic and psychosocial approval determinants of the work conducted by the truth and reconciliation commissions (TRC) are analysed based on original survey data from Chilean, Argentinian and Peruvian samples (N = 2,947). A linear multiple regression analysis was carried out (R ² between .28 and .44; f ² between .45 and .78) which reveals the positive effect of commission functions perceived achievement, mainly the knowledge of truth (β = .28), justice (β = .15) and the contribution in creating a common history (β = .15). An analysis by country reveals in Chile salient variables such as institutional trust, political ideas, institutional apologies and hope and sadness emotions. In Argentina, together with TRC functions, the degree of information about the work of the commission and the perception of a negative social climate appear as relevant predictors. As regards Peru, the degree of exposure to violence appears as a good predictor of TRC’s work support. The results show the relevance of TRC functions’ fulfillment, as well as the role of institutional variables in the approval of the work they have done.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguilar

Balcells

Cebolla

(2011). Las actitudes de los españoles ante las medidas de justicia transicional relativas a la guerra civil y al franquismo [Spaniard’s attitudes towards civil war and francoism’s transitional justice measures]. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 69, 59–90. doi:10.3989/ris.2009.06.30

Avruch

(2010). Truth and reconciliation commissions: Problems in transitional justice and the reconstruction of identity. Transcultural Psychiatry, 47, 33–49. doi:10.1177/1363461510362043

Bar-Tal

(Ed.). (2011). Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: Social psychological perspective. Hove and New York: Psychology Press: Frontiers of Social Psychology Series.

Beramendi

Sosa

Zubieta

(2012). Anomia y percepción de control en el contexto argentino [Anomie and perceived control in the Argentine context]. Revista de Psicología Política, 45, 43–60.

Beristain

C. M.

Páez

Rimé

Kanyangara

(2010). Psychosocial effects of participation in rituals of transitional justice: A collective-level analysis and review of the literature of the effects of TRCs and trials on human rights violations in Latin America. Revista de Psicología Social, 25, 47–60. doi:10.1174/021347410790193450

Blatz

C. W.

Philpot

(2010). On the outcomes of intergroup apologies: A review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 995–1007. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00318.x

Brown

Cehajic

(2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: Mediators of the effects of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 669–684. doi:10.1002/ejsp.466

Brown

González

Zagefka

Manzi

Čehajić

(2008). Nuestra culpa: Collective guilt and shame as predictors of reparation for historical wrongdoing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 75–90. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.75

Carbonell

(2003). Una mirada a la verdad. Percepciones de la población de Huancavelica sobre la Comisión de la Verdad y la Reconciliación [A look at the truth. Perceptions of the population of Huancavelica on the Commission of Truth and Reconciliation]. Lima: Consejería de Proyectos.

10.

Cárdenas

Arnoso

Páez

(2015). Predictors of beliefs in intergroup forgiveness in a Chilean general population sample. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18(eX), 1–9. doi:10.1017/sjp.2015.36

11.

Cárdenas

Ascorra

San Martín

Rodríguez

(2013). Emociones como predictores del perdón en el contexto de la violación a los derechos humanos en chile [Emotions as predictors of forgiveness in the context of violation of human rights in chile]. Psicoperspectivas, 12, 30–49.

12.

Cárdenas

Páez

Rimé

(2013). El impacto psicosocial de los procesos transicionales en Chile: Evaluación de los efectos de las comisiones nacionales de “Verdad y Reconciliación” y “Prisión Política y Tortura” [The psychosocial impact of transitionalprocesses in Chile: Assessing the impact of the National Commissions on “Truth and Reconciliation” and “Political Imprisonment and Torture”]. Revista de Psicología Social, 28, 145–156. doi:10.1174/021347413806196717

13.

Cárdenas

Páez

Rimé

Bilbao

Á.

Asún

(2014). Personal emotions, emotional climate, social sharing, beliefs, and values among people affected and unaffected by past political violence. Peace & Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20, 452–464. doi:10.1037/pac0000038

14.

Comisión de la Verdad y Reconciliación . (2004). HatunWillakuy: Versión abreviada del Informe Final de la Comisión de la Verdad y Reconciliación [Abbreviated version of Final Report of the Commission of Truth and Reconciliation]. Lima (Perú).

15.

Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación . (1991). Informe de la Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación [Report of the national commissionon truth and reconciliation]. Santiago (Chile).

16.

Comisión Nacional sobre la Desaparición de Personas . (1984). Nunca Más. Informe de la Comisión Nacional sobre la Desaparición de Personas [Never More. Report of the National Commission on disappearance of persons]. Buenos Aires.

17.

Devos

Silver

L. A.

Mackie

D. M.

Smith

E. R.

(2002). Experiencing intergroup emotions. In Mackie

D. M.

Smith

E. R.

(Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 113–134). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

18.

Dresler-Hawke

Liu

J. H.

(2006). Collective shame and the positioning of German national identity. Psicología Política, 32, 131–153.

19.

Durkheim

(2007/1912). Las formas elementales de la vida religiosa [The elementary form of the religious life]. Madrid: Ediciones Akal.

20.

Fehr

Gelfand

M. J.

(2012). The forgiving organization: A multilevel model of forgiveness at work. Academy of Management Review, 37, 664–688. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0497

21.

Ferguson

Binks

Roe

M. D.

Brown

J. N.

Adams

Cruise

S. M.

Lewis

C. A.

(2007). The IRA apology of 2002 and forgiveness in Northern Ireland’s Troubles: A cross-national study of printed media. Peace & Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13, 93–113. doi:10.1037/h0094026

22.

Garretón

González

Lauzán

(2011). Políticas públicas de verdad y memoria en 7 países de América Latina [Public policies of truth and memory in 7 countries in Latin America]. Santiago: Centro de Derechos Humanos.

23.

Gibson

J. L.

(2004). Overcoming apartheid: Can truth reconcile a divided nation? New York, NY: Russell Sage.

24.

Hayner

P. B.

(2001). Unspeakable truths: Confronting state terror and atrocity. New York, NY: Routledge.

25.

Jelin

Langland

(2003). Monumentos, memoriales y marcasterritoriales [Monuments, memorials and territorial markings]. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.

26.

Kanyangara

Rimé

Paez

Yzerbyt

(2014). Trust, individual guilt, collective guilt and dispositions toward reconciliation among rwandan survivors and prisoners before and after their participation in postgenocide Gacaca courts in Rwanda. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2, 401–416. doi:10.5964/jspp.v2i1.299

27.

Lira

(2010). La reparación a las víctimas: Una responsabilidad del Estado [The reparation to victims: A state responsibility]. Mensaje, 59, 6–11.

28.

Manzi

(2006). Memoria colectiva del golpe de Estado en Chile [Collective memory of the coup d’etat in Chile]. In Carretero

Rosa

González

M. F.

(Eds.), Enseñanza de la historia y memoria colectiva (pp. 287–312). Buenos Aires: Paidós.

29.

Manzi

González

(2007). Forgiveness and reparation in Chile: The role of cognitive and emotional intergroup antecedents. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13, 71–91. doi:10.1037/h0094025

30.

Manzi

Ruiz

Krause

Meneses

Haye

Kronmüller

(2004). Memoria colectiva del golpe de Estado de 1973 en Chile [Collective memory of the 1973 millitary coup in Chile]. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 38, 153–169.

31.

Morton

T. A.

Postmes

(2011). Moral duty or moral defence? The effects of perceiving shared humanity with the victims of ingroup perpetrated harm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 127–134. doi:10.1002/ejsp.v41.1

32.

Mullet

Nann

Kandiangandu

Neto

Da Pinto

M. C.

(2011). Hacia una política positiva: El caso del perdón en el contexto intergrupal de África y Asia [Towards a positive policy: The case of intergroup forgiveness in the context of Africa and Asia]. In Páez

Beristain

González

J. L.

Basabe&

De Rivera

(Eds.), Superando la violencia colectiva y construyendo cultura de paz (pp. 377–398). Madrid: Fundamentos.

33.

Nadler

Liviatan

(2006). Intergroup reconciliation: Effects of adversary expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients’ trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 459–470. doi:10.1177/0146167205276431

34.

Nadler

Malloy

T. E.

Fisher

J. D.

(2008). The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

35.

Noor

Brown

Prentice

(2008). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 481–495. doi:10.1348/014466607X238751

36.

Páez

(2010). Official or political apologies and improvement of intergroup relations: A neo-Durkheimian approach to official apologies as rituals. Revista de Psicología Social, 25, 101–115. doi:10.1174/021347410790193504

37.

Páez

Ruiz

J. I.

Gailly

Kornblit

A. L.

Wiesenfeld

Vidal

C. M.

(1997). Clima emocional: Su concepto y medición mediante una investigación transcultural [Emotional climate: Its concept and measurement in a crosscultural research]. Revista de Psicología Social, 12, 79–98. doi:10.1174/021347497320892045

38.

Philpot

C. R.

Hornsey

M. J.

(2008). What happens when groups say sorry: The effects of intergroup apologies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 474–487. doi:10.1177/0146167207311283

39.

Rimé

Kanyangara

Yzerbyt

Páez

(2011). The impact of Gacaca tribunals in Rwanda: Psychosocial effects of participation in a truth and reconciliation process after a genocide. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 695–706. doi:10.1002/ejsp.822

40.

Sikkink

Booth Walling

(2007). The impact of human rights trials in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research, 44, 427–445. doi:10.1177/0022343307078953

41.

Staub

(2005). Constructive rather than harmful forgiveness, reconciliation and ways to promote them after genocide and mass killing. In Worthington

E. L.

(Ed.), Handbook of Forgiveness (pp. 443–459). New York, NY: Routledge.

42.

Staub

Pearlman

L. A.

Gubin

Hagengimana

(2005). Healing, reconciliation, forgiving and the prevention of violence after genocide or mass killing: An intervention and its experimental evaluation in Rwanda. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 297–334. doi:10.1521/jscp.24.3.297.65617

43.

Tam

Hewston

Kenworthly

Cairns

Marinetti

Geddes

(2007). Postconflict reconciliation: Intergroup forgiveness and implicit biases in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 303–320. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00563.x

44.

Thoms

Ron

Paris

(2008). The effect of transitional justice mechanisms. A summary of empirical research findings and implications for analysts and practitioners . CIPS Working Papers, Centre for International Policy Studies with financial support, Canada.

45.

Van Tongeren

D. R.

Burnetteb

J. L.

O’Boylec

Worthington

E. L.

Forsyth

D. R.

(2014). A meta-analysis of intergroup forgiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9, 81–95. doi:10.1080/17439760.2013.844268

46.

Vázquez

Páez

(2011). Posttraumatic growth in Spain. In Weiss

Berger

(Eds.), Posttraumatic growth and culturally competent practice (pp. 97–112). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

47.

Wohl

M. J. A.

Hornsey

M. J.

Bennett

S. H.

(2012). Why group apologies succeed and fail: Intergroup forgiveness and the role of primary and secondary emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 306–322. doi:10.1037/a0024838

48.

Zubieta

Delfino

Fernández

(2007). Confianza institucional y el rol mediador de creencias y valores [Institutional trust and the mediating role of beliefs and values]. Revista de Psicología, 3, 101–120.

49.

Zubieta

Muratori

Mele

(2012). Bienestar, clima emocional, percepción de problemas sociales y confianza [Wellbeing, emotional climate, perception of social problems and confidence]. Anuario de Investigaciones, XIX, 97–106.