Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-11
Media consumption for information about Covid-19 during lockdown in Spain: the influence of demographic variables,focus-alertness reaction and emotions ( Consumo de medios para obtener información sobre la Covid-19 durante el confinamiento en España: influencia de variables demográficas,de alerta-focalización y emocionales )
This research analyses how sex, age, focus-alertness and emotional responses to the pandemic influenced media consumption for information about Covid-19 during lockdown in Spain. A sample of 1,981 participants were surveyed during the first two months of lockdown, specifically from 13 March to 12 May 2020. The sample was composed of 71.3% females and was aged between 18 and 72 (M = 35.37; SD = 12.71). The results showed that older people chose conventional media (e.g., radio) to find information about coronavirus, while younger people preferred social media (e.g., Instagram). More females than males chose written social media such as WhatsApp, as well as ‘face-to-face’ interaction. The results showed that the best predictors of media consumption for information about the pandemic were focus-alertness and negative emotional reactions to Covid-19; the greater the alertness and negative emotional reaction, the greater media consumption. Age and time in lockdown were also relevant variables, but to a lesser degree, such that the older the person and the longer in lockdown, the less media consumed.
BlascovichJ.MendesW. B. (2001). Challenge and threat appraisals. The role of affectives cues. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Feeling and thinking. The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 59–82). Cambridge University Press.
3.
BOE. (2020). Real decreto 463/2020, de 14 de marzo, por el que se declara el estado de alarma para la gestión de la situación de crisis sanitaria ocasionada por el Covid-19. BOE, 14(67), 25390–25400. https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2020-3692
4.
BrooksS. K.WebsterR. K.SmithL. E.WoodlandL.WesselyS.GreenbergN.RubinG. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395, 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
5.
FernándezI. (2016). Bienestar y salud. In FernándezI. (Ed.), Cuaderno de prácticas de psicología social y comunitaria (2ª ed., pp. 17–35). Sanz & Torres/UNED.
6.
FernándezI.PáezD.PennebakerJ. (2004). Escritura expresiva, deber de memoria y afrontamiento tras el impacto del 11-M: Un estudio experimental. Ansiedad y Estrés, 10(2–3), 233–245.
7.
FernándezI.PennebakerJ. W. (2011). La superación del trauma a través de la escritura. In PáezD.Martín-BeristaínC.GonzálezJ. L.Basabe.N.De RiveraJ.(Coords.) (Eds.), Superando la violencia colectiva y construyendo una cultura de paz (pp. 343–352). Fundamentos.
8.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
9.
FiskeS. T. (2018). Social beings. Core motives in social psychology (4th ed.). Wiley.
10.
HornmoenH.BackholmK. (2018). Social media use in crisis and risk communication: Emergencies, concerns and awareness. Emerald Group Publishing.
11.
IgartuaJ. J.HumanesM. L. (2004). Teoría e investigación en comunicación social. Síntesis.
12.
IgartuaJ. J.Ortega-MohedanoF.Arcila-CalderónC. (2020). The uses of communication in the time of coronavirus. A cross-cultural study. El profesional de la información, 29(3), e290318. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.18
13.
IzardC. E. (1991). The psychology of emotions. Plenum Press.
14.
KatzE.BlumerJ. G.GurevitchM. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109
15.
PáezD.FernándezI.Martín-BeristaínC. (2001). Catástrofes, traumas y conductas colectivas: Procesos y efectos culturales. In SanJuanC. (Ed.), Catástrofes y ayuda en emergencia: Estrategias de evaluación, prevención y tratamiento (pp. 85–148). Icaria.
16.
PáezD.VergaraA. (1995). Cultural differences in emotional knowledge. In RusselJ. A. (Ed.), Everyday conceptions of emotions (pp. 415–434). Kluwer Academic Press.
17.
RiméB. (2009). Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion: Theory and Empirical Review. Emotion Review, 1(1), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073908097189
18.
RiméB.FinkenauerC.LuminetO.ZechE.PhilippotP. (1998). Social sharing of emotion: New evidence and new questions. European Review of Social Psychology, 9(1), 145–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779843000072
19.
RoderoE. (2020). Radio: The medium that best copes in crises. Listening habits, consumption, and perception of radio listeners during the lockdown by the Covid-19. El profesional de la información, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.06
20.
SandinB.ValienteR. M.García-EscaleraJ.ChorotP. (2020). Impacto psicológico de la pandemia de COVID-19: Efectos negativos y positivos en población española asociados al periodo de confinamiento nacional. Revista de psicopatología y psicología clínica, 25(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.27569
21.
SchererK. (2009). Emotions are emergent processes: They require a dynamic computational architecture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3459–3474. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0141
22.
SheldonP.RauschnabelP. A.AntonyM. G.CarS. (2017). A cross-cultural comparison of Croatian and American social network sites: Exploring cultural differences in motives for Instagram use. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 643–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.009
23.
VázquezC.HervásG. (2010). Perceived benefits after terrorist attacks: The role of positive and negative emotions. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(2), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439761003630060
24.
WangC.PanR.WanX.TanY.Linkang XuL.HoC. S.HoR. C. (2020). Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729
25.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
26.
WeinerB. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Springer-Verlag.
