Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-06
Phraseological manipulation as a humour tool in 8–12-year-olds’ written narratives in Spanish ( La desautomatización fraseológica como recurso humorístico en narraciones escritas por niños y niñas de 8 a 12 años en español )
Phraseological manipulation (PhM) is defined as an intentional and recognizable transformation of a phraseological item with different communicative effects. The relationship between this linguistic procedure and the notion of incongruity — the basic ingredient of a humorous product — is clear. It is also evident that the appropriate use of PhM requires good metalinguistic skills, and this becomes relevant when dealing with children. In this paper we analyse the use of PhM as a linguistic device to trigger humour in 448 narratives written by schoolchildren of three age bands: 8, 10 and 12 years old. Our results are: (1) the use of PhM is scarce at the age of 8 (around 3%), whereas it increases exponentially in 12-year-olds (around 30%); (2) the qualitative approach reveals that children at the age of 8 make a rather epipragmatic use of PhM, which deserves some interesting observations.
AttardoS. (2017). The GTVH and humorous discourse. In W. Chlopicki & D. Brzozowska (Ed.), Humorous Discourse (pp. 93–106). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501507106-005
3.
CunninghamJ. (2005). Children’s humor. In ScarlettW. G.NaudeauS.Salonius-PasternakD.PonteI. (Eds.), Children’s play (pp. 93–108). Sage Publications.
4.
ForaboscoG. (2008). Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of humor research?Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-008-0003-5
5.
Galindo-MerinoM. (2017). La identidad de género a través del humor en niños y niñas de 10 años. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 70, 99–118. https://doi.org/10.5209/CLAC.56319
6.
GibsonJ. M. (2019). An introduction to the psychology of humor. Routledge.
Guerrero-SalazarS. (2017). La desautomatización de las unidades fraseológicas en los titulares deportivos. Verba: anuario galego de filoloxía, 44, 99–131. https://doi.org/10.15304/verba.44.2815
9.
KurversJ.Van HoutR.VallenT. (2007). Literacy and Word Boundaries. Low-educated Second Language and Literacy Acquisition: Research, Policy and Practice: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Forum.
10.
LavalV. (2003). Idiom comprehension and metapragmatic knowledge in French children. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(5), 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00137-6
11.
LevoratoM. C.CacciariC. (1995). The effects of different tasks on the comprehension and production of idioms in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60(2), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1995.1041
12.
LevoratoM. C.CacciariC. (2002). The creation of new figurative expressions: Psycholinguistic evidence in italian children, adolescents and adults. Journal of Child Language, 29(1), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000901004950
13.
MartinR. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Elsevier Academic Press.
14.
MartinR. A. (2014). Book Review: O’Shannon, D. (2012). What are you laughing at? A comprehensive guide to the comedic event. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 582–585. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v10i3.823
15.
MartinR. A. (2016). Sense of humor. In LópezS. J. (Ed.), Positive psychological assessment (2nd ed., pp. 350–353). American Psychological Association.
16.
Martí-SánchezM. (2014). Motivación y arbitrariedad en la desautomatización fraseológica (sobre sus implicaciones didácticas). In Mogorrón-HuertaP.MejriS. (Eds.), Fijación, traducción, variación y desautomatización (pp. 89–115). Universidad de Alicante.
17.
Martí-SánchezM. (2015). La búsqueda de sentido en la desautomatización fraseológica. In Mogorrón-HuertaP.NavarroF. A. (Eds.), Fraseología, Didáctica y Traducción (pp. 117–135). Peter Lang.
18.
McGheeP. E. (2002). Understanding and promoting the development of children’s humor. Kendall Hunt Publishing.
19.
MeanyM. M.ClarkT.LainesteL. (2014). Comedy, creativity, and culture: A metamodern perspective. The International Journal of Literary Humanities, 11(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7912/CGP/v11i04/43909
O’ShannonD. (2012). What are you laughing at? A comprehensive guide to the comedic event. Bloomsbury Academic.
22.
PawleyA.SyderF. H. (1983). Two Puzzles for Linguistic Theory: Nativelike Selection and Nativelike Fluency. In RichardsJ. C.SchmidtR. W. (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 191–226). Longman.
23.
SulsJ. M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons. In GoldsteinJ. H.McGheeP. E. (Eds.), The psychology of humor (pp. 81–100). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50010-9
24.
SulsJ. M. (1983). Cognitive processes in humour appreciation. In McGheeGoldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humour research (pp. 39–57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5572-7_3
25.
TimofeevaL. (2009). La desautomatización fraseológica: un recurso para crear y divertir. In Jiménez RuizJ. L.TimofeevaL. (Eds.), Estudios de Lingüística: Investigaciones lingüísticas del siglo XXI (pp. 249–271). Universidad de Alicante.
26.
Timofeeva-TimofeevL. (2016). Children using phraseology for humorous purposes: The case of 9-to-10-year-olds. In Ruiz-GurilloL. (Ed.), Metapragmatics of humor: Current research trends (pp. 275–300). IVITRAA, John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.14.14tim
27.
Timofeeva-TimofeevL. (2017). Metapragmática del humor infantil. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a La Comunicación, 70, 5–19.https://doi.org/10.5209/CLAC.56314
28.
Timofeeva-TimofeevL.Ruiz-GurilloL. (2021). Marcas e indicadores humorísticos en las narraciones escritas de niños y niñas de 8, 10 y 12 años en español. Spanish in Context, 18(1), 83–112.https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00069.tim
