Why the tall-poppy syndrome is becoming worse in the creative professions / Razones por las que el síndrome de la amapola alta es cada vez más acentuado en las profesiones creativas
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2019
Why the tall-poppy syndrome is becoming worse in the creative professions / Razones por las que el síndrome de la amapola alta es cada vez más acentuado en las profesiones creativas
The tall-poppy syndrome (TPS) is a pattern of behaviour whereby people who excel in some respect are cut down to size by those around them. People are often uncomfortable with those who excel and therefore, in effect, seek to put them in their place. I argue in this article that the TPS is, in some respects, getting worse, even in the creative professions. I suggest a number of reasons why this might be so and also what societies might do about it.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AczelB. (press). Low levels of wisdom–foolishness. In SternbergR. J.GlueckJ. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of wisdom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AczelB.PalfiB.KekecsZ. (2015). What is stupid?: People’s conception of unintelligent behavior. Intelligence, 53, 51–58.
3.
BarnettS. M.RindermannH.WilliamsW. M.CeciS. J. (press). Society and intelligence. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BeghettoR. A.KaufmanJ. C. (2016). Nurturing creativity in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
BinetA.SimonT. (1916). The development of intelligence in children. (E. S. Kite, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
7.
BratsbergB.RogebergO. (2018). Flynn effect and its reversal are both environmentally caused. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 6674–6678.
8.
CarrollJ. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9.
DunningD. (2011). The dunning–kruger effect: On being ignorant of one’s own ignorance. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 247–296.
10.
EidelmanS.CrandallC. S. (2012). Bias in favor of the status quo. Social and personality. Psychology Compass, 6, 270–281.
11.
EidelmanS.CrandallC. S.PattershallJ. (2009). The existence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 765–775.
12.
EidelmanS.PattershallJ.CrandallC. S. (2010). Longer is better. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 993–998.
13.
FlynnJ. R. (1984). The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 29–51.
14.
FlynnJ. R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 171–191.
15.
FlynnJ. R. (2016). Does your family make you smarter? Nature, nurture, and human autonomy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FlynnJ. R. (press). The Flynn effect: Its influence on intelligence research. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
17.
HarperJ. (2013). Mobbed! What to do when they really are out to get you. New York, NY: Backdoor.
18.
HeidenreichS.SpiethP. (2013). Why innovations fail—the case of passive and active innovation resistance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17, 1–42.
19.
KahnemanD. (2013). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
20.
KaufmanJ. C.SternbergR. J. (Eds.). (2010). Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21.
KaufmanJ. C.SternbergR. J. (Eds.). (2019). Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
KleijnenM.LeeN.WetzelsM. (2009). An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents. Journal Of Economic Psychology, 30, 344–357.
24.
LanierJ. (2018). Ten arguments for deleting your social media accounts right now. New York, NY: Henry Holt & Co.
25.
LaukkanenT.SinkkonenS.KivijärviM.LaukkanenP. (2007). Innovation resistance among mature consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24, 419–427.
26.
MoscoviciS.ZavalloniM. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 125–135.
27.
OrwellG. (1950). 1984. New York, NY: Signet.
28.
RamS.ShethJ. N. (1989). Consumer resistance to innovations: the marketing problem and its solutions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6, 5–14.
29.
RuncoM. A. (2017). Active ethical leadership, giftedness, and creativity. Roeper Review, 39, 242–249.
30.
RuncoM. A. (press). Political examples of a dark side of creativity and the impact on education. In MullenC. (Ed.), Education under duress. New York, NY: Springer.
31.
SackettP. R.ShewachO. R.DahlkeJ. A. (2020). The predictive value of general intelligence. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Human intelligence: An introduction (pp. 381–414). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32.
SimontonD. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York, NY: Guilford.
33.
SkinnerB. F. (1968). Walden II. New York, NY: Macmillan.
34.
SternbergR. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
SternbergR. J. (Ed.). (2003). Psychologists defying the crowd: Stories of those who battled the establishment and won. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36.
SternbergR. J. (2004). Why smart people can be so foolish. European Psychologist, 9, 145–150.
37.
SternbergR. JThe Rainbow Project Collaborators. (2006). The rainbow project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical and creative skills. Intelligence, 34, 321–350.
38.
SternbergR. J. (2010a). College admissions for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
SternbergR. J. (2010b). The dark side of creativity and how to combat it. In CropleyD. H.CropleyA. J.KaufmanJ. C.RuncoM. A. (Eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 316–328). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
40.
SternbergR. J. (2016). What universities can be. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
41.
SternbergR. J. (2018a). Successful intelligence in theory, research, and practice. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), The nature of human intelligence (pp. 308–321). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42.
SternbergR. J. (2018b). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12, 50–67.
43.
SternbergR. J. (2018c). Why real-world problems go unresolved and what we can do about it: Inferences from a limited-resource model of successful intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 6(3), 44.
44.
SternbergR. J. (2018d). Wisdom, foolishness, and toxicity in human development. Research in Human Development. doi:10.1080/15427609.2018.1491216
45.
SternbergR. J. (press). The augmented theory of successful intelligence. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
46.
SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L. (Eds.). (2002). The general factor of intelligence: How general is it?Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
