Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016-06
Relational offers and demands: analysing the conflictual interactional components of anaclitic and introjective female depressive patients / Ofertas y demandas relacionales: análisis de los componentes interaccionales conflictivos de pacientes mujeres depresivas anaclíticas e introyectivas
Depressive symptoms are associated with typical ways of relating to and handling conflict with others. This study empirically analysed the most frequent relational ‘demands’ and ‘offers’ identified in the verbal expressions of depressive patients during the first session, comparing them according to their personality organization (anaclitic vs introjective). The CCRT-LU-S Category System was used to analyse the first session of 27 patients with depressive symptomatology. The results showed that the highest percentage of depressive patients’ interactional components identified were relational ‘offers’, whereas the remainder percentage were relational ‘demands’. At the same time, the highest percentage of those interactional components were verbalized as disharmonious (weakness, withdrawing, unpleasant and fighting) by anaclitic patients, while the highest percentage were verbalized as harmonious (loving or having self-determination) by introjective patients. Implications for clinical relevance of these results are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbaniC.PokornyD.BlaserG.GrueningerS.KoenigS.MarschkeF.KächeleH. (2002). Reformulation of the core conflictual relationship theme (CCRT) categories: The CCRT-LU category system. Psychotherapy Research, 12, 319–338. doi:10.1093/ptr/12.3.319
2.
AllenJ. G. (2006). Mentalizing in practice. In AllenJ. G.FonagyP. (Eds.), Handbook of mentalization-based treatment (pp. 3–30). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders - text revision (DSM-IV-TR) (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
4.
BarberJ. P.FoltzC.WeinrybR. M. (1998). The central relationship questionnaire: Initial report. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 131–142. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.45.2.131
5.
BlattS. J. (2004). Experiences of depression: Theoretical, clinical and research perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
BlattS. J. (2007). A fundamental polarity in psychoanalysis: Implications for personality development, psychopathology and the therapeutic process. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 26, 494–520. doi:10.1080/07351690701310581
7.
BlattS. J. (2008). Polarities of experience: Relatedness and self-definition in personality development, psychopathology, and the therapeutic process. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11749-006
8.
BlattS. J.ShaharG. (2004). Psychoanalysis with whom, for what, and how? Comparisons with psychotherapy. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 52, 393–447. doi:10.1177/00030651040520020401
BrunerJ. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
BucciW. (1995). The power of the narrative: A multiple code account. In PennebakerJ. W. (Ed.), Emotion, disclosure and health (pp. 71–92). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12.
Choi-KainL. W.GundersonJ. G. (2008). Mentalization: Ontogeny, assessment, and application in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 1127–1135. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07081360
13.
ConradiH. J.JongeP. (2009). Recurrent depression and the role of adult attachment: A prospective and a retrospective study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 116, 93–99. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2008.10.027
14.
DiguerL.LefebvreR.DrapeauM.LuborskyL.RousseauJ. P.HébertE.. (2001). The core conflictual relationship theme (CCRT) of psychotic, borderline and neurotic personality organizations. Psychotherapy Research, 11, 169–186. doi:10.1093/ptr/11.2.169
15.
EspinosaD. H.ValdésN. (2012). Codificación de Episodios Relacionales a partir de la versión en castellano del Método del Tema Central de Conflicto Relacional CCRT-LU-S: Manual de Procedimiento. Proyecto Fondecyt N°3130367. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved fromhttp://www.milenio-depresion.cl/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Manual-CCRT-LU-S.pdf
16.
FonagyP.GergelyG.JuristE.TargetM. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of self. New Work, NY: Other Press.
17.
HamiltonJ.KivlighanD. M. (2009). Therapists’ projection: The effects of therapists’ relationship themes on their formulation of clients’ relationship episodes. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 312–322. doi:10.1080/10503300902838130
HoyerJ.KleinA. (2000). Self-reflection and well-being: Is there a healthy amount of introspection?Psychological Reports, 86, 135–141. doi:10.2466/pr0.2000.86.1.135
20.
López Del HoyoY.ÁvilaA.PokornyD.AlbaniC. (2004). Adaptación del sistema de categorías CCRT-LU a lengua castellana: El sistema de categorías CCRT-LU-S [Adaptation of the CCRT-LU category system to Spanish language: The CCRT-LU-S category system]. Intersubjetivo, 6, 296–308.
21.
LuborskyL.Crits-ChristophP. (1990). Understanding transference: The core conflictual relationship theme method. New York, NY: Basic Books.
22.
LuytenP.BlattS.CorveleynJ. (2005). Towards integration in the theory and treatment of depression? the time is now. In CorveleynJ.LuytenP.BlattS. (Eds.), The theory and treatment of depression towards a dynamic interactionism model (1st ed., pp. 253–284). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
23.
LuytenP.BlattS. J.Van HoudenhoveB.CorveleynJ. (2006). Depression research and treatment: Are we skating to where the puck is going to be?Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 985–999. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.12.003
24.
MorN.WinquistJ. (2002). Self-focused attention and negative affect: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 638–662. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.638
25.
RotenY.DrapeauM.StiglerM.DesplandJ. N. (2004). Yet another look at the CCRT: The relation between core conflictual relationship themes and defensive functioning. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 252–260. doi:10.1093/ptr/kph021
26.
SalvoD.CordesK.ValdésN. (2012). Pauta de Observación para el diagnóstico de Sintomatología Depresiva [Observation guideline for the diagnosis of depressive symptoms]. Unpublished manuscript.
27.
SladeA.GrienenbergerJ.BernbachE.LevyD.LockerA. (2005). Maternal reflective functioning, attachment and the transmission gap: A preliminary study. Attachment & Human Development, 7, 283–298. doi:10.1080/14616730500245880
28.
TaubnerS.KesslerH.BuchheimA.KächeleH.StaunL. (2011). The role of mentalization in the psychoanalytic treatment of chronic depression. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 74, 49–57. doi:10.1521/psyc.2011.74.1.49
29.
TrapnellP. D.CampbellJ. D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 284–304. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.284
30.
VanhueleS.DesmetM.RoseelY.MeganckR. (2006). Core transference themes in depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 91, 71–75. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2005.12.012
31.
VerhaegheP. (2004). On being normal and other disorders. Handbook of psychodiagnostics. New York, NY: Other Press.
