Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016-06
Analysis of the therapeutic process in a case of couple therapy for depression: how to deal with a problematic within-system alliance / Análisis del proceso terapéutico en un caso de terapia de pareja para la depresión: cómo lidiar con una alianza intra-sistema problemática
The purpose of this study was to analyse the therapeutic process of a case of couple therapy for depression. The evolution of symptoms, marital satisfaction and therapeutic alliance were evaluated during therapy. Results showed that symptoms followed a specific trajectory where the patient displayed a sudden deterioration towards the end of their therapy but, at follow-up, reached a clinically significant change in both individual and relational measures. The analysis of the process highlighted the association between the couple’s relational pattern and its problematic within-system alliance, as well as the relevance of this association for explaining the trajectory of change. The most useful case management interventions were: (a) fostering a relational formulation of symptoms; and (b) the use of therapy termination as an intervention. Results from this case study support the role of relational mechanisms for the process of change and provide technical alternatives that can be applied in cases at risk of failure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnkerM.DuncanB.SparksJ. (2009). Using client feedback to improve couple therapy outcomes: A randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 693–704. doi:10.1037/a0016062
2.
AsenE.JonesE. (2004). Terapia sistémica de pareja y depression. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer.
3.
BarbatoA.D’AvanzoB. (2008). Efficacy of couple therapy as a treatment for depression: A meta-analysis. Psychiatric Quarterly, 79, 121–132. doi:10.1007/s11126-008-9068-0
4.
BaucomD. H.BelusJ. M.AdelmanC. B.FischerM. S.PaprockiC. (2014). Couple‐based interventions for psychopathology: A renewed direction for the field. Family Process, 53, 445–461. doi:10.1111/famp.12075
5.
BeckA. T.SteerR. A.BrownG. K. (1996). Manual for Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II). San Antonio, TX: Psychology Corporation.
6.
BensonL. A.McGinnM. M.ChristensenA. (2012). Common principles of couple therapy. Behavior Therapy, 43, 25–35. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.12.009
7.
BordinE. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16, 252–260. doi:10.1037/h0085885
8.
ChristensenA.AtkinsD. C.YiJ.BaucomD. H.GeorgeW. H. (2006). Couple and individual adjustment for 2 years following a randomized clinical trial comparing traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 1180–1191. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1180
9.
DalgleishT. L.JohnsonS. M.Burgess MoserM.WiebeS. A.TascaG. A. (2014). Predicting key change events in emotionally focused couple therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41, 260–275. doi:10.1111/jmft.12101
10.
DossB. D.ThumY. M.SevierM.AtkinsD. C.ChristensenA. (2005). Improving relationships: Mechanisms of change in couple therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 624–633. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.4.624
11.
ElliottR.SlatickE.UrmanM. (2001). Qualitative change process research on psychotherapy: Alternative strategies. In FrommerJ.RennieD. L. (Eds.), Qualitative psychotherapy research: Methods and methodology (pp. 69–111). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
12.
EscuderoV. (2009). La creación de la alianza terapéutica en la terapia familiar. Apuntes de Psicología, 27, 247–259.
13.
EscuderoV. (2014). Building the therapeutic Alliance in family therapy: How to integrate systemic complexity and contradictions. Connessioni, 32, 7–25.
14.
FirstM. B.SpitzerR. L.GibbonM.WilliamsJ. B. (1999). Guía del usuario para la entrevista clínica estructurada para los trastornos del Eje I del DSM-IV: SCID-I. Barcelona: Masson.
15.
FriedlanderM. L.EscuderoV.HorvathA. O.HeatheringtonL.CaberoA.MartensM. P. (2006). System for observing family therapy alliances: A tool for research and practice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 214–225. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.2.214
16.
GreenmanP.JohnsonS. (2013). Process research on EFT for couples: Linking theory to practice. Family Process, Special Issue on Couple Therapy, 52, 46–61.
17.
HeatheringtonL.FriedlanderM. L.GreenbergL. S. (2005). Change process research in couples and family therapy: Methodological challenges and opportunities. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 18–27. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.18
18.
JacobsonN. S.TruaxP. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12
19.
Knobloch-FeddersL. M.PinsofW. M.MannB. J. (2007). Therapeutic alliance and treatment progress in couple psychotherapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 245–257. doi:10.1111/jmft.2007.33.issue-2
20.
LeffJ.VearnalsS.BrewinC.WolffG.AlexanderB.AsenE.EverittB. (2000). The London depression intervention trial. Randomised controlled trial of antidepressants v. couple therapy in the treatment and maintenance of people with depression living with a partner: Clinical outcome and costs. British Journal of Psychiatry, 17, 95–100. doi:10.1192/bjp.177.2.95
21.
LinaresJ. L.CampoC. (2000). Tras la honorable fachada. Barcelona: Paidós.
22.
MontesanoA.FeixasG.MuñozD.CompañV. (2014). Systemic couple therapy for dysthymia: An evidence-based case study. Psychotherapy, 51, 30–40. doi:10.1037/a0033814
23.
MontesanoA. (2016). El diagrama circular en terapia de pareja: Un mapa relacional para guiar el proceso terapéutico. Revista de Psicoterapia, 104, 59–82.
24.
PinsofW. M.ZinbargR.Knobloch-FeddersL. M. (2008). Factorial and construct validity of the revised short form integrative psychotherapy alliance scales for family, couple, and individual therapy. Family Process, 47, 281–301. doi:10.1111/famp.2008.47.issue-3
25.
SallaM.VilaregutA.MontesanoA.PazC.FeixasG. (2016). Systemic Couple Therapy for Depression: Changes in Interpersonal Perception. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 25, 199–211.
26.
Santos-IglesiasP.Vallejo-MedinaP.SierraJ. C. (2009). Propiedades psicométricas de una versión breve de la Escala de Ajuste Diádico en muestras españolas. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9, 501–517.
27.
SanzJ.PerdigonA. L.VázquezC. (2003). Adaptación española del Inventario para de Depresion de Beck-II (BDI-II): Propiedades psicométricas en población general. Clínica y Salud, 14, 249–280.
28.
SeikkulaJ.AaltonenJ.KallaO.SaarinenP.TolvanenA. (2013). Couple therapy for depression in a naturalistic setting in Finland: A 2-year randomized trial. Journal of Family Therapy, 35, 281–302. doi:10.1111/joft.2013.35.issue-3
29.
SpanierG. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38, 15–28. doi:10.2307/350547
30.
SparksJ. (2015). The Norway couple project: Lessons learned. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41, 481–494.
31.
SymondsD.HorvathA. O. (2004). Optimizing the alliance in couple therapy. Family Process, 43, 443–455. doi:10.1111/famp.2004.43.issue-4
32.
WhismanM. A.JohnsonD. P.BeD.LiA. (2012). Couple-based interventions for depression. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 3, 185–198. doi:10.1037/a0029960
33.
WhiteM. (2007). Maps of narrative practice. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
