Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016-03
The development of the first symbolic uses in Mexican children from the pragmatics of object / Desarrollo de los primeros usos simbólicos en niños mexicanos desde la pragmática del objeto
This paper longitudinally studies the emergence and evolution of the first symbolic uses of objects in Mexican children. We observed eight children in triadic interaction with one of their parents and 10 objects in a semi-structured situation at nine, 12, 15 and 18 months old. The children began to use objects symbolically at 12 months, and the duration and frequency increased with age. The highest percentage of the total frequency of symbolic uses, of the four levels identified, was level 1. The frequency of level 4, where two or more symbolic actions occur one after the other, giving rise to ‘symbolic narratives’, increased according to age. These data confirm that knowledge of the rules of canonical uses of objects are the meanings which first symbols base themselves on and that children use the symbolic uses that they are aware of to create ‘symbolic narratives’.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AcredoloL.GoodwynS. (1988). Symbolic gesturing in normal infants. Child Development, 59, 450–466. doi:10.2307/1130324
2.
AdamsonL. B.BakemanR.DecknerD. F. (2004). The development of symbol-infused joint engagement. Child Development, 75, 1171–1187. doi:10.1111/cdev.2004.75.issue-4
3.
Barthélémy-MussoA.TartasV.GuidettiM. (2013). Prendre les objets et leurs usages au sérieux: aproche développementale de la co-construction de conventions sémiotiques entre enfants. Psychologie Française, 58, 67–88. doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2012.10.001
4.
BelskyJ.MostR. K. (1981). From exploration to play: A cross-sectional study of infant free play behavior. Developmental Psychology, 17, 630–639. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.17.5.630
5.
BoyatzisC. J.WatsonM. W. (1993). Preschool children’s symbolic representation of objects through gestures. Child Development, 64, 729–735. doi:10.2307/1131214
6.
CamaioniL.AureliT.BellagambaF.FogelA. (2003). A longitudinal examination of the transition to symbolic communication in the second year of life. Infant and Child Development, 12, 1–26.
7.
CárdenasK. (2012). Primeros usos simbólicos de niños con síndrome de Down en contextos de interacción triádica: un estudio longitudinal entre los 12 y 21 meses de edad(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España.
8.
CárdenasK.RodríguezC.PalaciosP. (2014). First symbols in a girl with down syndrome: A longitudinal study from 12 to 18 months. Infant Behavior & Development, 37, 416–427. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.06.003
9.
CasbyM. W. (1992). Symbolic play: Development and assessment considerations. Infants and Young Children, 4(3), 43–48. doi:10.1097/00001163-199201000-00007
10.
CasbyM. W. (2003). The development of play in infants, toddlers, and young children. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 24, 163–174. doi:10.1177/15257401030240040201
11.
El’koninD. B. (1966). Symbolics and its functions in the play of children. Soviet Education, 8(3), 35–41.
12.
FensonL.RamsayD. S. (1981). Effects of modeling action sequences on the play of twelve-, fifteen-, and nineteen-month-old children. Child Development, 52, 1028–1036. doi:10.2307/1129108
13.
FieseB. H. (1990). Playful relationships: A contextual analysis of mother-toddler interaction and symbolic play. Child Development, 61, 1648–1656. doi:10.2307/1130772
14.
GaskinsS.HaightW.LancyD. F. (2007). The cultural construction of play. In GöncüA.GaskinsS. (Eds.), Play and development. Evolutionary, sociocultural and functional perspectives (pp. 179–202). New York, NY: LEA.
15.
GermanT. P.LeslieA. M. (2001). Children’s inferences from “knowing” to “pretending” and “believing”. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 59–83. doi:10.1348/026151001165967
16.
Goldin-MeadowS. (2000). Beyond words: The importance of gesture to researchers and learners. Child Development, 71, 231–239. doi:10.1111/cdev.2000.71.issue-1
17.
GöncüA.JainJ.TuermerU. (2007). Children’s play as cultural interpretation. In GöncüA.GaskinsS. (Eds.), Play and development. Evolutionary, sociocultural and functional perspectives (pp. 155–178). New York, NY: LEA.
18.
GoodwynS. W.AcredoloL. P. (1993). Symbolic gesture versus word: Is there a modality advantage for onset of symbol use?Child Development, 64, 688–701. doi:10.2307/1131211
19.
HowesC. (2011). Social play of children with adults and peers. In PellegriniA. D. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the development of play (pp. 231–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
InhelderB.LézineL.SinclairH.StambakM. (1972). Les débuts de la fonction symbolique. Archives de Psychologie, 41, 187–243.
21.
IversonJ. M.CapirciO.CaselliM. C. (1994). From communication to language in two modalities. Cognitive Development, 9, 23–43. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(94)90018-3
22.
JackowitzE. R.WatsonM. W. (1980). Development of object transformations in early pretend play. Developmental Psychology, 16, 543–549. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.16.6.543
23.
KendonA. (2000). Language and gesture: Unity or duality? In McNeillD. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 47–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
LeslieA. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind”. Psychological Review, 94, 412–426. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.412
25.
LeslieA. M. (1994). Pretending and believing: Issues in the theory of ToMM. Cognition, 50, 211–238. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90029-9
26.
LeslieA. M.ThaissL. (1992). Domain specificity in conceptual development: Neuropsychological evidence from autism. Cognition, 43, 225–251. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90013-8
27.
LillardA. (2007). Guided participation: How mothers structure and children understand pretend play. In GöncüA.GaskinsS. (Eds.), Play and development. Evolutionary, sociocultural and functional perspectives (pp. 131–153). New York, NY: LEA.
28.
LoweM. (1975). Trends in the development of representional play in infants from one to three years? An observational study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 16, 33–47. doi:10.1111/jcpp.1975.16.issue-1
29.
McCuneL. (1995). A normative study of representational play in the transition to language. Developmental Psychology, 31, 198–206. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.2.198
30.
McCune-NicolichL. (1981). Toward symbolic functioning: Structure of early pretend games and potential parallels with language. Child Development, 52, 785–797. doi:10.2307/1129078
31.
McNeillD. (2000). Introduction. In McNeillD. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 1–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
MoroC.RodríguezC. (2005). L’objet et la construction de son usage chez le bébé. Une approche sémiotique du développement préverbal. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
33.
MurilloE.BelinchónM. (2012). Gestural-vocal coordination: Longitudinal changes and predictive value on early lexical development. Gesture, 12, 16–39. doi:10.1075/gest.12.1
34.
NicolichL. M. (1977). Beyond sensorimotor intelligence: Assessment of symbolic maturity through analysis of pretend play. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 23, 89–99.
35.
NielsenM.ChristieT. (2008). Adult modelling facilitates young children’s generation of novel pretend acts. Infant and Child Development, 17, 151–162. doi:10.1002/icd.538
36.
NovackM.Goldin-MeadowS. (2015). Learning from gesture: How our hands change our minds. Educ. Psychol Rev, 27, 405–412. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9325-3
37.
PalaciosP. (2009). Origen de los usos simbólicos de los objetos en los niños en contextos de comunicación e interacción triádicos(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España.
38.
PalaciosP.RodríguezC. (2015). The development of symbolic uses of objects in infants in a triadic context: A pragmatic and semiotic perspective. Infant and Child Development, 24, 23–43. doi:10.1002/icd.1873
39.
PalaciosP.RodríguezC.Méndez-SánchezC.Hermosillo-de la TorreA. E. (2013). Contextos comunicativos e interactivos triádicos: la unidad básica de la educación. EnPalaciosP.FarfánM. C.NavarreteE.MiramontesS. C. (Comp.), Psicología educativa: reflexión, práctica e intervención (pp. 14–40). Toluca, México: UAEM.
40.
PiagetJ. (1976). La formation du symbole chez l’enfant. Neuchatel: Delachaux & Niestlé. (Original work published in 1945).
41.
RodríguezC. (2006). Del ritmo al símbolo. Los signos en el nacimiento de la inteligencia. Barcelona: Horsori.
42.
RodríguezC. (2012). The functional permanence of the object: A product of consensus. In MartíE.RodríguezC. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 123–150). New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions Publishers.
43.
RodríguezC.Moreno-NúñezA.BasilioM.SosaN. (2015). Ostensive gestures come first: Their role in the beginning of shared reference. Cognitive Development, 36, 142–149. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.09.005
44.
RodríguezC.MoroC. (1999). El mágico número tres. Cuando los niños aún no hablan. Barcelona: Paidós.
45.
RodríguezC.MoroC. (2002). Objeto, comunicación y símbolo. Una mirada a los primeros usos simbólicos de los objetos. Estudios de Psicología, 23, 323–338. doi:10.1174/021093902762224416
46.
RodríguezC.PalaciosP.CárdenasK.YusteN. (2014). Les symboles: Des formes de second ou de troisiéme sens? In MoroC.Muller-MirzaN. (Eds.), Psychologie du développement, sémiotique et cultura (pp. 99–116). Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
47.
RoopnarineJ. L. (2011). Cultural variations in beliefs about play, parent-child play, and children’s play: Meaning for childhood development. In PellegriniA. D. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the development of play (pp. 19–37). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
SinclairH. (1970). The transition from sensory-motor behaviour to symbolic activity. Interchange, 1, 119–126. doi:10.1007/BF02214682
49.
SladeA. (1987). A longitudinal study of maternal involvement and symbolic play during the toddler period. Child Development, 58, 367–375. doi:10.2307/1130513
50.
StrianoT.TomaselloM.RochatP. (2001). Social and object support for early symbolic play. Developmental Science, 4, 442–455. doi:10.1111/desc.2001.4.issue-4
51.
Tamis-LeMondaC.BornsteinM. (1991). Individual variation, correspondence, stability, and change in mother and toddler play. Infant Behavior and Development, 14, 143–162. doi:10.1016/0163-6383(91)90002-A
52.
TomaselloM. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
VigS. (2007). Young children’s object play: A window on development. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 19, 201–215. doi:10.1007/s10882-007-9048-6
54.
VygotskiL. S. (2000). Historia del desarrollo de las funciones psíquicas superiores. In VygotskiL. S. Ed., Obras escogidas III. Problemas del desarrollo de la psique (pp. 11–340) (Trad. L. Kuper). Madrid: Visor. (Original work published 1931).
55.
WernerH.KaplanB. (1963). Symbol formation. New York, NY: Wiley.
