In this introduction to the issue Semiotic tools in early mathematical knowledge, we offer a theoretical perspective that provides meaning to the different contributions. We begin by reviewing three perspectives bearing an important influence on the study of mathematical development in childhood (the Piagetian, the information processing and the neonativist perspectives). Next, we underscore the need for developmental studies in this domain to consider the semiotic component, and hence the socio-cultural component, in depth. The contributions that form this volume — a theoretical article, five papers and four short reports of empirical studies and a review of an instructional approach — illustrate different ways of including the semiotic component in the study of children’s mathematical knowledge.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllardiceB. (1977). The development of written representations for some mathematical concepts. Journal of Children’s Mathematical Behaviour, 1(4), 135–148.
2.
AndersY.RossbachH-G.WeinertS.EbertS.KugerS.LehrlS.Von MauriceJ. (2012). Home and preschool learning environments and their relations to the development of early numeracy skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 231–244. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.08.003
3.
AndersenC.ScheuerN.Pérez EcheverríaM. del. P.TeubalE. (Eds.). (2009). Representational systems and practices as learning tools. Rotterdam: Sense.
4.
BishopA. J. (1991). Mathematical enculturation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
5.
BoschM.ChevallardY. (1999). La sensibilité de l’activité mathématique aux ostensifs. Objet d’étude et problématique. Recherche en Didactique des Mathématiques, 19, 77–124.
6.
BrizuelaB. M. (2004). Mathematical development in young children: Exploring notations. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
7.
BrunerJ. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
CareyS. (2009). The origins of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
CarraherT. N.CarraherD. W.SchliemannA. D. (1985). Mathematics in the streets and in schools. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 21–29. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.1985.tb00951.x
10.
ColeM. (1996). Cultural psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
DonaldM. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
DuvalR. (1995). Sémiosis et pensée humaine. Registres sémiotiques et apprentissages intellectuels. Bern: Peter Lang.
13.
FerreiroE.TeberoskyA. (1979). Los sistemas de escritura en el desarrollo de los niños. México: Siglo XXI.
14.
GearyD. G. (2006). Development of mathematical understanding. In KuhnD.SieglerR. S. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Volume 2. Cognition, perception and language (pp. 777–810). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
15.
GelmanR.GallistelC. R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
HirschfeldL. A.GelmanS. A. (Eds.). (1994). Mapping the mind. Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
17.
KamiiC. (1985). Young children reinvent arithmetic: Implications of Piaget’s theory. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
18.
MartíE. (2003). Representar el mundo externamente. La adquisición infantil de los sistemas externos de representación. Madrid: Antonio Machado Libros.
19.
MartíE. (2012). Thinking with signs: From symbolic actions to external systems of representation. In MartíE.RodríguezC. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 151–170). New Brunswick, NY: Transactions.
20.
NunesT.BryantP. (1996). Children doing mathematics. Oxford: Blackwell.
21.
OlsonD. R. (1994). The world on paper. The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Pérez EcheverríaM. del. P.ScheuerN. (2005). Desde el sentido numérico al número con sentido. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 28, 393–407. doi:10.1174/021037005774518974
23.
PiagetJ. (1947). La psychologie de l’intelligence. Paris: Armand Collin.
24.
PiagetJ. (1950). Introduction à l’épistémologie genétique. 1. La pensé mathématique. Paris: Pressses Universitaires de France.
25.
PimmD. (1987). Speaking mathematically. Communication in mathematics classrooms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
26.
SaxeG. B. (1991). Culture and cognitive development: Studies in mathematical understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
SaxeG. B.GubermanS. R.GearhartM.GelmanR.MasseyC. M.RogoffB. (1987). Social processes in early number development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 52(2), i–162. doi:10.2307/1166071
28.
ScheuerN.SinclairA.Merlo de RivasS.Tièche ChristinatC. (2000). Cuando ciento setenta y uno se escribe 10071: niños de 5 a 8 años produciendo numerales. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 23, 31–50. doi:10.1174/021037000760087955
29.
SfardA. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
30.
SinclairA. (1988). La notation numérique chez l’enfant. In SinclairH. (Ed.), La production de notations chez le jeune enfant (pp. 71–98). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
31.
TeubalE.GubermanA. (2014). Textos gráficos y alfabetización múltiple. Herramientas para el desarrollo del pensamiento y el aprendizaje en el nivel inicial. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
32.
ValsinerJ. (2000). Culture and human development. London: Sage Publications.
33.
WynnK. (1995). Origins of numerical knowledge. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 35–60.
