This paper provides the first evidence of maternal speech — motherese — in Wichi, an indigenous language with a complex morphology spoken in the Gran Chaco region of Argentina. The corpus consists of 22 hours of video recordings from the daily life of three children, starting from their one-morpheme utterance period (MLU = 1) to the onset of combining early morphemes (MLU = 2.30). Employing a mixed methodological approach, results allowed us: (a) to create an observational system of specific categories for the analysis of the maternal speech in Wichi; (b) to identify motherese in Wichi, noticeably stable across cases and organized into constellations of lexical, pragmatic-discursive and prosodic features with changes and continuities during the developmental target period. The results are discussed cross-culturally in the light of a renewed cultural approach, while limitations and future directions are addressed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AustinJ. (1962). How to do things with words. Clarendon Press.
2.
BaiocchiM.WaxmanS.PérezE.PérezA.TavernaA. (2019). Social-ecological relations among animals serve as a conceptual framework among the Wichi. Cognitive Development, 52, 100807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100807.
3.
BrownR. (1973). A first language. The early stages. Harvard University Press.
4.
ChavajayP.RogoffB. (1999). Cultural variation in management of attention by children and their caregivers. Developmental Psychology, 35(4), 1079–1090. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.1079
5.
De León PasquelL. (2012). Language socialization and multiparty participation frameworks. In DurantiA.OchsE.SchieffelinB. (Eds.), The Handbook of language socialization (pp. 81–111). Willey-Blackwell.
6.
DemuthC. (2013). Protoconversation and protosong as infant’s socialization environment. In TchombeT. M. S.NsamenangB.KellerH.FülöpM. (Eds.), Cross-cultural psychology: An Africentric perspective (pp. 232–256). Design House Ed.
7.
Escuela Wichí Lako. (2010). Informe anual. Ministerio de Educación de la Provincia de Formosa.
FergusonC.SnowC. (1977). Talking to children: Language Input and Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
10.
GarnicaO. (1977). Some prosodic and paralinguistic features of speech to young children. In SnowC. E.FergusonC. A. (Eds.), Talking to children: Language input and acquisition (pp. 63–88). Cambridge University Press.
11.
GreenacreM. J. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. Academic Press.
12.
HallE. (1966). The hidden dimension. Doubleday.
13.
HillC. E. (1990). Exploratory in-session process research in individual psychotherapy: A review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.58.3.288
14.
Hoff-GinsbergE. (1991). Mother-child conversation in different social classes and communicative settings. Child Development, 62(4), 782–796. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131177
15.
HuttenlocherJ.VasilyevaM.WaterfallH. R.VeveaJ. L.HedgesL. V. (2007). The varieties of speech to young children. Developmental Psychology, 43(5), 1062–1083. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.5.1062
16.
MastinJ. D.MarchmanV.Elwood-LoweM.FernaldA. (2016, May). Quantity & quality of child-directed speech (CDS) predict children’s vocabulary size and language processing abilities. Paper presentado en 20th Biennial Meeting of the International Conference on Infant Studies, New Orleans, Louisiana.
17.
McDonaldL.PienD. (1981). Mother conversational behavior as a function of interactional intent. Journal of Child Lunguage, 9(2), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090000475X
18.
MedinD. L.OjalehtoB.MarinA.BangM. (2013). Culture and epistemologies: Putting culture back into the ecosystem. In HongY.GelfandM. J.ChiuC. (Eds.), Advances in culture and psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 177–217). Oxford University Press.
19.
NercesianV. (2014). Wichi lhomtes. Estudio de la gramática y la interacción fonología-morfología-sintaxis-semántica. LINCOM.
20.
OchsE.SchieffelinB. B. (1984). Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories. In ShwederR.LeVineR. (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 276–320). Cambridge University Press.
21.
RamirezM. L.MigdalekM.SteinA.CristiaA.RosembergC. (2016). La función pragmática de las emisiones dirigidas a bebés. Un estudio en hogares de distintos grupos socioeconómicos de Argentina. PRAXIS. Revista de Psicología, 29, 91–114.
22.
SachsJ. (1977). The Adaptive Significance of Linguistic Input to Prelinguistic Infants. In C. E. Snow & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to children: Language Input and Acquisition (pp. 51–61). Cambridge University Press.
23.
SachsJ.BrownR.SalernoR. (1972). Adults’ speech to children. In von Raffler-engelW.LebrunY. (Eds.), Baby talk and infant speech. Swets & Zeitlinger.
24.
SchieffelinB. B. (1985). The acquisition of Kaluli. In SlobinD. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 525–593). Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
ShneidmanL.Goldin-MeadowS. (2012). Language input and acquisition in a Mayan village: How important is directed speech?Developmental Science, 15(5), 659–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01168.x
26.
ShneidmanL. A.ArroyoM. E.LevineS. C.Goldin-MeadowS. (2013). What counts as effective input for word learning?Journal of Child Language, 40(3), 672–686. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000912000141
27.
SnowC.FergusonC. (Eds.). (1977). Talking to children. Cambridge University Press.
28.
StollS. (2009). Crosslinguistic approaches to language acquisition. In BavinE. L. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (pp. 70–89). Cambridge University Press.
29.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded eory. Procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.
30.
TavernaA.MedinD. L.WaxmanS. R. (2018). ‘Inhabitants of the earth’: Reasoning about folkbiological concepts in Wichi children and adults. In MarshalP. J.BrennemanK. (Eds.), Young children’s developing understanding of the biological world (pp. 7–27). Routledge.
TavernaA. S.MedinD. L.WaxmanS. (2020). Tracing culture in children’s thinking: A socioecological framework in understanding nature (Rastreando la cultura en el pensamiento infantil: Una socioecología para comprender la naturaleza). Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 43(2), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2020.1723277
33.
TavernaA. S.WaxmanS. R.MedinD. L.PeraltaO. A. (2012). Folkbiological concepts: New evidence from Wichí children and adults. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 12(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342079
34.
TavernaA. S.WaxmanS. R.MedinD. L.PeraltaO. A.MoscoloniN. (2014). Naming living things: Linguistic, experiential and cultural factors in Wichí and Spanish speaking children. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 2–4(3–4), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342122
