Relations between literacy-related abilities and the lexical quality of expository texts of Hebrew-speaking children ( Relaciones entre habilidades relacionadas con el aprendizaje de la lengua escrita y la calidad léxica de los textos expositivos de niños hebreo-parlantes )

Abstract

Spanish

This study sought to explore the advanced lexicon, one of the hallmarks of text quality. To this end, we analysed the advanced lexicon deployed in the production of two types of texts — a descriptive and an argumentative — by Hebrew-speaking school children. Our study had two goals, the first to trace the developmental path of the use of advanced lexicon in writing scholastic types of texts. The second goal was to investigate the relations between literacy-related abilities and the use of advanced lexicon in writing. Accordingly, 292 Israeli grade-school children (second-, third-, fourth- and fifth-graders) were administered a linguistic, cognitive, reading and spelling test battery and produced two descriptive and two argumentative texts. The texts were analysed for noun abstractness, occurrence of internal-state verbs and the morphological complexity of adjectives. Findings showed an age-related increase in both literacy-related abilities and the lexical quality in the texts. Moreover, interactions found between lexical quality, age and genre suggest that text quality is dynamic, determined by a network of differential age- and literacy-related factors.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albuquerque

C. P.

(2017). Rapid naming: The importance of different reading and spelling dimensions. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 35(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.3715

Altman

Armon-Lotem

Fichman

Walters

(2016). Macrostructure, microstructure, and mental state terms in the narratives of English–Hebrew bilingual preschool children with and without specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(1), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000466

Avivi Ben- Zvi

(2010). Morpho-lexical development across the school years [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Tel Aviv University. [in Hebrew].

Berman

Nayditz

Ravid

(2011). Linguistic diagnostics of written texts in two school-age populations. Written Language & Literacy, 14(2), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.01ber

Berman

R. A.

(2008). The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language, 35(4), 735–771. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000908008787

Berman

R. A.

Nir-Sagiv

(2007). Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 79–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530709336894

Berninger

V. W.

Abbott

R. D.

(2010). Listening comprehension, oral expression, reading comprehension, and written expression: Related yet unique language systems in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019319

Berninger

V. W.

Abbott

R. D.

Abbott

S. P.

Graham

Richards

(2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500104

Berninger

V. W.

Winn

W. D.

(2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In MacArthur

Graham

Fitzgerald

(Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96–114). Guilford Press.

10.

Brandão

A. C. P.

Oakhill

(2005). “How do you know this answer?” Children’s use of text data and general knowledge in story comprehension. Reading & Writing, 18(7), 687–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5600-x

11.

Caravolas

Samara

(2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In Pollatsek

Treiman

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199324576.013.21

12.

Castillo

Tolchinsky

(2018). The contribution of vocabulary knowledge and semantic orthographic fluency to text quality through elementary school in Catalan. Reading & Writing, 31(2), 293–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9786-5

13.

Crossley

S. A.

Salsbury

McNamara

D. S.

Jarvis

(2011). Predicting lexical proficiency in language learner texts using computational indices. Language Testing, 28(4), 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210378031

14.

Cutillas

Tolchinsky

(2017). Use of adjectives in Catalan: A morphological characterization in different genres and modes of production through school-age development. First Language, 37(1), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723716673957

15.

Egoz-Libshtain

(2014). Distribution of Hebrew mental verbs in children’s peer talk [unpublished master’s thesis]. Tel Aviv University. [in Hebrew].

16.

Ferretti

R. P.

Lewis

W. E.

Andrews-Weckerly

(2009). Do goals affect the structure of students’ argumentative writing strategies? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014702

17.

Figueroa

Meneses

Chandia

(2018). Academic language and the quality of written arguments and explanations of Chilean 8th-graders. Reading & Writing, 31(3), 703–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9806-5

18.

Fitzgerald

Shanahan

(2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_5

19.

Glantz

(1989). Mivxan Mem (A test of abstract verbal intelligence). Bar Ilan University. [in Hebrew].

20.

Halliday

M. A. K.

(2004). The language of science. ( Webster

, Ed). Continuum.

21.

Harrison

G. L.

Goegan

L. D.

Jalbert

McManus

Sinclair

Spurling

(2016). Predictors of spelling and writing skills in first- and second-language learners. Reading & Writing, 29(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9580-1

22.

Jakobs

E.-M.

Perrin

(Eds). (2014). Handbook of writing and text production. Berlin, Boston.

23.

Keller-Margulis

M. A.

Mercer

S. H.

Payan

McGee

(2015). Measuring annual growth using written expression curriculum-based measurement: An examination of seasonal and gender differences. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(2), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000086

24.

Kent

S. C.

Wanzek

(2016). The relationship between component skills and writing quality and production across developmental levels: A meta-analysis of the last 25 years. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 570–601. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315619491

25.

Kim

Y.-S. G.

Al Otaiba

Folsom Sidler

Gruelich

(2013). Language, literacy, attentional behaviors, and instructional quality predictors of written composition for first-graders. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(3), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.01.001

26.

Kim

Y.-S. G.

Schatschneider

(2017). Expanding the developmental models of writing: A direct and indirect effects model of developmental writing (DIEW). Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000129

27.

Lyons

(1977). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.

28.

Marinellie

S. A.

Kneile

L. A.

(2012). Acquiring knowledge of derived nominals and derived adjectives in context. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 43(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0053)

29.

McCarthy

P. M.

Jarvis

(2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.381

30.

McCutchen

(1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8(3), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464076

31.

McDonough

Song

Hirsh-Pasek

Michnick Golinkoff

Lannon

(2011). An image is worth a thousand words: Why nouns tend to dominate verbs in early word learning. Developmental Science, 14(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00968.x

32.

McNamara

D. S.

Crossley

S. A.

McCarthy

P. M.

(2010). Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication, 27(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309351547

33.

Nagy

Townsend

(2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.011.

34.

O’Hallaron

C. L.

(2014). Supporting fifth-grade ELLs’ argumentative writing development. Written Communication, 31(3), 304–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314536524

35.

Olinghouse

N. G.

Graham

Gillespie

(2015). The relationship of discourse and topic knowledge to fifth-graders’ writing performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037549

36.

Olinghouse

N. G.

Wilson

(2012). The relationship between vocabulary and writing quality in three genres. Reading & Writing, 26(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9392-5

37.

Olive

Favart

Beauvais

(2009). Children’s cognitive effort and fluency in writing: Effects of genre and of handwriting automatization. Learning & Instruction, 19(4), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.005

38.

Owen Van Horne

A. J.

Lin

S. L.

(2011). Cognitive state verbs and complement clauses in children with SLI and their typically developing peers. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetic, 25(10), 881–898. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2011.582226

39.

Paivio

(2006). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Erlbaum.

40.

Parodi

(2007). Reading–writing connections: Discourse-oriented research. Reading and Writing, 20(3), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9029-7

41.

Pinto

Bigozzi

Tarchi

Accorti Gamannossi

Canneti

(2015). Cross-lag analysis of longitudinal associations between primary school students’ writing and reading skills. Reading & Writing, 28(8), 1233–1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9569-9

42.

Ravid

(2006). Semantic development in textual contexts during the school years: Noun scale analyses. Journal of Child Language, 33(4), 791–821. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000906007586

43.

Ravid

Bar-On

Levie

Douani

(2016). Hebrew adjective lexicons in developmental perspective. The Mental Lexicon, 11(3), 401–428. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.11.3.04rav

44.

Ravid

Berman

R. A.

(2009). Developing linguistic register across text types: The case of Modern Hebrew. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(1), 108–145. https://doi.org/10.107/p&c.17.1.04rav

45.

Ravid

Cahana-Amitay

(2005). Verbal and nominal expressions in narrating conflict situations in Hebrew. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(2), 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.08.006

46.

Ravid

Levie

(2010). Hebrew adjectives in later language text production. First Language, 30(1), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723709350529

47.

Ravid

Shalom

(2012). Standards of evaluation of writing in the seventh grade. Report submitted to Keren Yad Hanadiv, Israel. [in Hebrew].

48.

Reilly

Keah

(2007). Formal distinctiveness of high- and low-imageability nouns: Analyses and theoretical implications. Cognitive Science, 31(1), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210709336988

49.

Saban-Bezalel

(1999). Development of syntactic and metasyntactic abilities in kindergarten and school-age children [unpublished Master’s thesis]. Tel Aviv University. [in Hebrew].

50.

Seroussi

(2011). The morphology-semantics interface in the mental lexicon: The case of Hebrew [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Tel Aviv University.

51.

Seroussi

(2018). Later morpho-lexical acquisition. In Bar-On

Ravid

(Eds.), Handbook of communication disorders: Theoretical, empirical and applied linguistic perspectives (pp. 219–234). De Gruyter.

52.

Shany

Bahat

Lachman

Shalem

Zeiger

(2006). “Aleph-Taph”: An assessment system for reading and writing disabilities. Yesod.[in Hebrew].

53.

Smolkin

L. B.

Mctigue

E. M.

Donovan

C. A.

Coleman

J. M.

(2008). Explanation in science trade books recommended for use with elementary students. Science Education, 93(4), 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20313

54.

Stavans

Seroussi

Zadunaisky-Ehrlich

(2019). Literacy-related abilities’ effects on argumentative text quality structure. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(3), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1086296X19859515

55.

Tong

Irby

B. J.

Lara-Alecio

Koch

(2014). Integrating literacy and science for English language learners: From learning-to read to reading-to-learn. The Journal of Educational Research, 107(5), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.833072

56.

Toulmin

(2003). The uses of argument (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

57.

Uccelli

Barr

C. D.

Dobbs

C. L.

Phillips Galloway

Meneses

Sanchez

(2015). Core Academic Language Skills (CALS): An expanded operational construct and a novel instrument to chart school-relevant language proficiency in per-adolescent and adolescent learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(5), 1077–1109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641400006X