Perceptions of university teachers about teaching and the quality of pedagogy in higher education: a study in Portugal / Percepciones de los profesores universitarios sobre la enseñanza y la calidad de la pedagogía de la educación superior: un estudio realizado en Portugal
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2015
Perceptions of university teachers about teaching and the quality of pedagogy in higher education: a study in Portugal / Percepciones de los profesores universitarios sobre la enseñanza y la calidad de la pedagogía de la educación superior: un estudio realizado en Portugal
This paper draws upon a broader piece of research aiming at investigating the perceptions of university teachers about the quality of pedagogy in higher education and their professional development. Data were collected through questionnaires. In total, 171 faculty members participated in the study. Findings indicate that the participants recognized the importance of quality of pedagogy, and particularly the principles of transparency and intentionality. The most important motives for university teachers to engage in professional development opportunities are emancipatory and pedagogical ones. The participants also stress that in general they feel good as far as their teaching activity is concerned. However, those who revealed greater satisfaction with teaching valued more the quality of pedagogy in general. Also, those who feel good in relation to teaching value more the principles of interaction, democratization and negotiation with the students. Implications of the findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BexleyE.ArkoudisS.JamesR. (2013). The motivations, values and future plans of Australian academics. Higher Education, 65, 385–400. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9550-3
2.
BiggsJ. (2012). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 31, 39–55. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.642839
3.
BrysonC.HandL. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, 349–362. doi:10.1080/14703290701602748
4.
CoffeyM.GibbsG. (2000). Can academics benefit from training? Some preliminary evidence. Teaching in Higher Education, 5, 385–389. doi:10.1080/713699136
5.
DayC. (2001). Desenvolvimento Profissional de Professores - Os Desafios da Aprendizagem Permanente. Porto: Porto Editora.
6.
DayC.KingtonA.StobartG.SammonsP. (2006). The personal and professional selves of teachers: Stable and unstable identities. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 601–616. doi:10.1080/01411920600775316
7.
FloresM. A.CarvalhoA. M.ArriagaC.AguiarC.AlvesF. F.ViseuF.MoraisN. (2007). Perspetivas e estratégias de formação de docentes do Ensino Superior. Um estudo na Universidade do Minho. Braga: CIEd.
8.
FloresM. A.RajalaR.Veiga SimaoA. M.TornbergA.JerkovicV. P. A. (2007). Learning at work potential and limits for professional development. In ButcherJ.McDonaldL. (Eds.), Addressing challenges and making a difference. Making a difference: Challenges for teachers, teaching, and teacher education (pp. 141–156). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
9.
FormosinhoJ. (2009). A academização da formação de professores. In FormosinhoJ. (coord.), Formação de Professores. Aprendizagem profissional e acção docente (pp. 73–92). Porto: Porto Editora.
10.
ForteA.FloresM. A. (2014). Teacher collaboration and professional development in the workplace: A study of Portuguese teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 91–105. doi:10.1080/02619768.2013.763791
GibbsG.CoffeyM. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5, 87–100. doi:10.1177/1469787404040463
13.
HargreavesA.FullanM. (2000). Mentoring in the new millennium. Theory into Practice, 39, 50–56. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3901_8
14.
KahuE. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 38, 758–773.
15.
KemberD.KwanK. P. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28, 469–490. doi:10.1023/A:1026569608656
16.
KızıltepeZ. (2008). Motivation and demotivation of university teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14, 515–530. doi:10.1080/13540600802571361
17.
KnightP.TaitJ.YorkeM. (2006). The professional learning of teachers in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 319–339. doi:10.1080/03075070600680786
18.
KriewaldtJ. (2012). Reorienting teaching standards: Learning from lesson study. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 31–41. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2011.643761
19.
LeachL.ZepkeN. (2011). Engaging students in learning: A review of a conceptual organiser. Higher Education Research & Development, 30, 193–204. doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.509761
20.
LeclercqD. (2001). Desafios actuais à pedagogia universitária. In ReimãoC. (org.), A formação pedagógica dos professores do ensino superior (pp. 29–51). Lisboa: Edições Colibri.
21.
MacKenzieJ.MeyersR. (2012). International collaboration in SoTL: Current status and future direction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6, Retrieved from http://www.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl
22.
MonereoC. (2013). La investigación en la formación del profesorado universitario: hacia una perspectiva integradora. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 36, 281–291. doi:10.1174/021037013807533052
23.
MonereoC.PozoJ. I. (2003). La cultura educativa en la Universidad: Nuevos retos para profesores e alumnos. In MonereoC.PozoJ. I. (Eds.), La Universidad ante nueva cultura educativa. Ensenar y aprender para la autonomía (pp. 15–30). Madrid: Editorial Sintesis.
PostareffL.Lindblom-YlänneS.NevgiA. (2007). The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 557–571. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.013
26.
PostareffL.Lindblom-YlänneS.NevgiA. (2008). A follow-up study of the effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 56, 29–43. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9087-z
27.
PriceM.HandleyK.MillarJ. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 879–896. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
28.
ProsserM.TrigwellK.TaylorP. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics’ conceptions of science learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 4, 217–231. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90024-8
29.
RasheedM. I.AslamH. D.SarwarS. (2010). Motivational issues for teachers in higher education: A critical case of IUB. Journal of Management Research, 2, 1–24. doi:10.5296/jmr.v2i2.349
30.
SadlerI. (2012). The challenges for new academics in adopting student-centred approaches to teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 731–745. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.543968
31.
SamuelowiczK.BainJ. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93–111. doi:10.1007/BF00138620
32.
Savin-BadenM. (2004). Understanding the impact of assessment on students in problem-based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41, 221–233. doi:10.1080/1470329042000208729
33.
SimãoJ.Machado Dos SantosS.Almeida CostaA. (2002). Ensino superior: uma visão para a próxima década. Lisboa: Gradiva.
34.
TienF. (2008). What kind of faculty are motivated to perform research by the desire for promotion?Higher Education, 55, 17–32. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9033-5
35.
TrigwellK.ProsserM. (1996). Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 275–284. doi:10.1080/03075079612331381211
36.
Veiga SimãoA. M.FloresM. A. (2010). Student-centred methods in higher education: Implications for student learning and professional development. The International Journal of Learning, 17, 207–218.
37.
VieiraF. (2002). Pedagogic quality at university: What teachers and students think. Quality in Higher Education, 8, 255–272. doi:10.1080/1353832022000031647
38.
VieiraF. (2013). The scholarship of pedagogy in adverse settings. Lessons from experience. In FloresM. A. et al. (Eds.), Back to the future: Legacies, continuities and changes in educational policy, practice and research (pp. 257–276). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
39.
VieiraF.FloresM. A.FerreiraF. I. (2012). Articulação curricular e pedagógica. Relatório interno do grupo de trabalho-Inovação Pedagógica. Braga: Universidade do Minho, Instituto de Educação.
40.
VieiraF.GomesA.GomesC.SilvaJ. L.MoreiraM. A.MeloM. C.AlbuquerqueP. B. (2002). Concepções de pedagogia universitária - um estudo na Universidade do Minho. Braga: Universidade do Minho, CEEP.
41.
VieiraF.SilvaJ. L.MeloM. C.MoreiraM. A.OliveiraL. R.GomesC.SousaM. (2004). Transformar a pedagogia na universidade. Experiências de investigação do ensino e da aprendizagem. Braga: CIEd.
42.
Visser-WijnveenG.StesA.Van PetegemP. (2012). Development and validation of a questionnaire measuring teachers’ motivations for teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 64, 421–436. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9502-3
43.
ZabalzaM. (2007a). Competencias docentes del profesorado universitario. Calidad y desarrolo profesional. Madrid: Narcea.
44.
ZabalzaM. (2007b). La enseñanza universitária. El escenario e sus protagonistas. Madrid: Narcea.
45.
ZimmermanB.SchunkD. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In ZimmermanB.SchunkD. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research and applications (pp. 1–30). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
