El presente trabajo analiza, desde un enfoque interactivo, algunas características del texto y del lector. Desde esta perspectiva se revisan algunos de los modelos de intervención encaminados a facilitar en el sujeto el producto final de la comprensión lectora. Como es sabido, esta intervención puede introducirse tanto desde el mismo material escrito, a través de técnicas y recursos sobre planes de escritura que aplica el escritor, como desde las características del lector, como es el conocimiento previo y el uso de estrategias lectoras más eficaces en los sujetos. Desde esta última perspectiva incidimos especialmente en aquellos entrenamientos de estrategias encaminadas a potenciar un conocimiento y aplicación de la estructura organizativa de los textos.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsM.J. (1980). «Failures to comprehed and levels of processing in reading». EnSpiroR.J.BruceB. C.BrewerW. F. (ed.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehensión.Hillsdale, Nueva Jersey: Erlbaum.
2.
ArmbrusterB. B.AndersonT. H. (1985). «Producing “considerate” expository text: Or easy reading is damned hard writing».Journal of Curriculum Studies, 173, 247–274.
3.
ArmbrusterB. B.AndersonT. H.OstertagJ. (1987). «Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text?»Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 331–346.
4.
AusubelD. P. (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. Nueva York, Grune and Stratton.
5.
AusubelD. P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A cognitive View.Nueva York: Holt, Rinehart y Winston.
6.
AusubelD. P.NovakJ. D.HanesianH. (1978). Educational Psychology, 2.a Ed., Nueva York: Holt Rinehart y Winston (Trad. cast, de M. Sandoval: Psicología Educativa. México: Trillas, 1983).
7.
BarnettJ. E. (1984). «Facilitating retention through instruction about text structure».Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 1–13.
8.
BartlettB. J. (1978). Top-level structure as an organizational strategy for recall of classroom text. Tesis doctoral no publícada. Arizona State University.
9.
BartlettF. C. (1932). Remembering. A study experimental and social psychology. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
10.
BowerJ. A. (1982). «Memory limitations in the oral reading comprehension of fourth-grade children».Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 200–216.
11.
BridgeC. A. (1987). «Strategies for Promoting Reader-Text Interactions». EnTierneyR. J.AndersP. L.MitchellJ. N. (eds.): Understanding Readers' Understanding.Hillsdale, Nueva Jersey: Erlbaum.
12.
BrittonB. K.GlynnS. M. (1989). Computer writing environments: Theory reserach and application.Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
13.
BrooksL. W.DansereauD. F. (1983). «Effects of structural schema training and text Organization on Expository Prose Processing».Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 6, 811–820.
14.
BrownA. L. (1980). «Metacognitive development and reading». EnSpiroR. J.BruceB.BrewerW. (ed.): Theorethical issues in reading comprehensión: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence and education. Hillsdale, Nueva Jersey; Erlbaum.
15.
BrownA. L.ArmbrusterB. B.BakerL. (1986). «The role of metacognition in reading and studying». EnOrasanuJ. (ed.): Reading comprehension: from research to practice.Hillsdale, Nueva Jersey: Erlbaum.
16.
BrownA. L.SmileyS. S. (1977). «Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development».Child Development, 48, 1–8.
17.
CarreteroM.LeónJ. A. (1990). «Desarrollo cognitivo y aprendizaje en la adolescencia». EnPalaciosJ. (comp.), Psicología Evolutiva, Madrid: Alianza.
18.
CiriloR.FossD. (1980). «Text structure and reading time for sentences».Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 96–109.
19.
CookL. K. (1982). The effects of text structure on the comprehension of scientific prose. Tesis doctoral no publicada. University of California, Santa Bárbara.
20.
CookL. K.MayerR. (1988). «Teaching Readers about the structure of scientific text».Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 4, 448–456.
21.
DansereauD. F. (1978). «The Development of a learning strategy curriculum». EnO'neilH. F.Jr. (ed.): Learning strategies.Nueva York: Academic Press, 1978.
22.
DansereauD. F. (1983). Learning strategy research. (Technical Report). For Worth: Texas Christian University.
23.
DansereauD. F.LongG. L.EvansS. H.ActkinsonT. R. (1980). «Objective ordering of instructional material using multidimensional scaling».Journal of Struttural Learning, 6, 299–314.
24.
Dee-LucasD.LarkinJ. H. (1986). «Novice strategies for comprehending scientific texts».Discourse Processes, 9, 329–354.
25.
EntwistleN. J.WatersonS. (1988). «Approaches to studyng and levels of processing in university students».British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 3, 258–265.
26.
EricsonK. A.StaszewskiJ. (1989). «Skilled memory and expertise: mechanisms of exceptional performance». EnKlahrD.KostovskyK. (eds.): Complex Information Processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon.Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
27.
FraseL. T. (1975). «Advances in research and theory in instructional technology». EnKerlingerF. N. (ed.: Review of Research in Education, 3, Peacok.
28.
García MadrugaJ. A.LeónJ. A.(en prensa). «Comprensión y Memoria de Textos Expositivos». EnCarreteroM.garcía madrugaJ.A.Adolescencia y Aprendizaje.Barcelona: LAIA.
29.
García MadrugaJ.Martín CorderoJ. I. (1987). Aprendizaje, comprensión y retención de textos.Madrid: UNED.
30.
GarnhamA. (1987). Mental Models as representation of discourse and text.Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
31.
GevaE. (1983). «Facilitating reading through flowcharting».Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 384–405.
32.
GlaserR.BassokM. (1989). «Learning theory and the study of instruction».Annual Review Psychology, 40, 631–666.
33.
GloverJ. A.DinnelD. L.HalpainD. R.MckeeT. K.CorkillA. J.WiseS. L. (1988). «Effects of Across-Chapter Signals on Recall ofText». Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 1, 3–15.
34.
GoetzE. T.AlexanderP. A.SchallertD. L. (1987). «The author's role in cueing strategic processing of college textbooks».Reading Research and Instruction, 27, 1, 1–11.
35.
HartleyJ. (1990). «Textbook design: Current status and future directions».International Journal of Educational Research, 14, 6, 533–541.
36.
HolleyC. D.DansereauD. F.McdonaldB. A.GarlandJ. C.CollinsK. W. (1979). «Evaluation of a hierarchical mapping technique as an aid to prose processing».Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4, 227–237.
37.
IrwinJ. W.PulverC.J. (1984). «Effects of explicitness, clause order, and reversibility on children's comprehension of causal relationship».Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 399–407.
38.
Johnson-LairdP. N. (1983). Mental Models.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
KintschW. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, Nueva Jersey; Erlbaum.
40.
KintschW. (1977). «On comprehending stories». EnJustM. A.CarpenterP. A.Cognitive processes in comprehensión. Hillsdale, Nueva Jersey; Erlbaum.
41.
KintschW. (1988). «The role of Knowledge in Discourse Comprehension: A Construction-Integration Model».Psychological Review, 95, 2, 163–182.
42.
KintschW.Van DijkT. A. (1978). «Toward a model of text comprehension and production».Psychological review, 85, 363–394.
43.
KintschW.YarbroughJ. C. (1982). «The role of rhetorical structure in text comprehension».Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 828–834.
44.
KleimanG. M. (1982). «Comparing good and poor readers: A critique of research». EnNelsonK. E. (ed.): Children's language. Vol. 3.Hillsdale, Nueva Jersey: Eribaum.
45.
LeónJ. A. (1986). La memoria de los niños a través de los cuentos: un análisis experimental.UNED: Mérida.
46.
LeónJ. A. (1989). Comprensión y memoria de textos expositivos: Diferencias entre sujetos expertos y novatos. Tesis doctoral inédita. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
47.
LeónJ. A.CarreteroM.(en prensa). «Signals effects on the recall and understanding of expository texts in expert and novice readers». EnOliveiraA.J. M. (ed.): Structures of comunication and intelligent helps for Hypermedia Couserware.Nueva York: Springer-Verlag.
48.
LeónJ. A.García MadrugaJ. A. (1989). «Comprensión de Textos e Instrucción».Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 169, 54–59.
49.
LeónJ. A.García MadrugaJ. A. (1991). «Comprensión y Memoria de Textos». EnRuiz VargasJ.M. (comp.): La Psicología de la memoria.Madrid: Alianza Psicología.
50.
LeónJ. A.MarchesiA. (1987). «La influencia de variables cognitivas en el recuerdo de cuentos y su valoración en función de la edad».Infancia y Aprendizaje, 37, 19–31.
51.
LomanN. C.MayerR. (1983). «Signaling Techniques that increase the understability of expository prose».Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 402–412.
52.
LorchR. F. JR. (1985). «Effects of recall of signals to text organization».Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 374–376.
53.
LorchR. F. JRChenA. M. (1986). «Effects of Number Signals of Reading and Recall».Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 4, 263–270.
54.
MandlH.SchnotzW. (1987). «New directions in text comprehension». EnDe CorteE.LodavijksH.ParmentierP.SpanP. (ed.): Learning and instruction: european research in an international context. Vol. 1.Oxford: Pergamon.
55.
MandlerJ. M.JohnsonN. S. (1977). «Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall».Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111–151.
56.
MartonF.SaljoR. (1984). «Approaches to learning». EnMartonF.HounsellD.EntwistleN. (eds.): The experience of learning.Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
57.
MayerR. E. (1979). «Can advance organizers influence meaningful learning?»Review of Educational Research, 49, 371–383.
58.
MayerR. E. (1985). «Structural analysis of Science prose: can we increase problem-solving performance». EnBrittonB. K.BlackJ. B.Understanding expository text.Hillsdale, Nueva Jersey: Erlbaum.
59.
MayerR. E.CookL. K.DyckJ. L. (1984). «Techniques that help readers build mental models from scientific text: Definitions pretraining and signaling».Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1089–1105.
60.
McclellandJ. L.RumelhartD. E.PdpGrupo (1986). Parallel distributed processing. Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 2.Cambridge, Ma: Bradford Books.
61.
MeyerB. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory.Amsterdam: North-Holland.
62.
MeyerB. J. F. (1977). «What Is Remembered from Prose: A Function of Passage Structure». EnFreedleR. O. (ed.): Discourse Processes: Advances in Research and Theory. Vol. 1: Discourse Production and Comprehension.Nueva Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
63.
MeyerB. J. F. (1984). «Text dimensions and cognitive processing». EnMandlH.SteinN. L.TrabassoT. (eds.): Learning and comprehension of text.Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
64.
MeyerB. J. F. (1985a). «Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures and problems». EnBrittonB. K.BlackJ. B. (eds.): Understanding Expository Text.Hillsdale, Nueva Jersey: Erlbaum.
65.
MeyerB. J. F. (1985b). «Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures and problems (Part II)». EnBrittonB. K.BlackJ. B. (eds.): Understanding Expository Text.Hillsdale, Nueva Jersey: Erlbaum.
66.
MeyerB. J. F. (1987). «Following the author's top-level organization; and important skill for reading comprehension». EntierneyR.J.AndersP. L.MitchellJ. N. (eds.): Understanding reader's understanding: Theory and Practice.Hillsdale, Nueva Jersey: Erlbaum.
67.
MeyerB. J. F.BrandtD. M.BluthG. J. (1980). «Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehensión of ninth-grade students».Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72–102.
68.
MeyerB. J. F.RiceG. E. (1982). «The interaction of reader strategies and the organization of text».Text, 2, 155–192.
69.
MeyerB.J.F.YoungC.J.BartlettB.J. (1989). Memory Improved. Reading and Memory Enhancement Across the Life Span Through Strategic Text Structures.New Jersey: Erlbaum.
70.
OakhillJ.GarnhamA. (1988). Becoming a Skilled Reader.Nueva York: Basil Blackwell.
71.
OhlhausenM. M.RollerC. M. (1988). «The operation of text structure and content schemata in isolation in interaction».Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 1, 70–88.
72.
O wingsR. A.PetersonG. A.BransfordJ. D.MorrisC. D.SteinB. S. (1980). «Spontaneus monitoring and regulation of learning: A comparison of successful and less ssuccessful fifth graders».Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 250–256.
73.
PerfettiCh. A.RothS. F. (1981). «Some of the interactive processes in reading and their role in reading skill». EnLesgoldA. M.PefettiCh. A. (eds.): Interactive processes in reading.Hillsdale, Nueva Jersey: Erlbaum.
74.
PoulsonD.KintschE.KintschW.PremackD. (1979). «Children's comprehension and memory for stories».Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28, 379–403.
75.
RederL. M. (1985). «Techniques available to Author, Teacher, and reader to improve retention of main ideas of a chapter». EnChipmanS. F.SegalJ. W.GlaserR. (eds.): Thinking and Learning skills. Vol. 2: Research and Open Questions.Hillsdale, Nueva Jersey: Erlbaum.
76.
RobinsonF. P. (1970). Effective study.Nueva York: Harper & Row.
77.
RothkoptE. Z. (1976). «Writting to teach and reading to learn: A perspective on the psychology of written instruction». EnCageN. L. (ed.): The Psychology of Teaching Methods. The seventy-fifth yearbook of the National Society for the study of education. Chicago University Press.
78.
RumelhartD. E. (1975). «Notes on a schema for stories». EnBobrowD. G.CollinsA. (eds.): Representing and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science.Nueva York: Academic Press.
79.
RumelhartD. E. (1977). «Understanding and summarizing brief stories». EnLabergeD.SamuelsS. J. (eds.): Basic Processes in reading: Perception and comprehension.Hillsdale. Nueva Jersey: Erlbaum.
80.
RumelhartD. E. (1980). «Schemata: The building blocks of cognition». EnSpiroR. J.BruceB. C.BrewerW. F. (eds.): Theoretical issues in reading comprehension.Hillsdale. Nueva Jersey: Erlbaum.
81.
RumelhartD. E.McclellandJ. L.PdpGrupo (1986). Parallel distributed processing explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1.Cambridge, Ma: Bradford Books.
82.
RumelhartD. E.NormanD. A. (1978). «Accretion, tuning, and retructuring: three modes of learning». EnCottonJ. W.KlatzkyR. L. (eds.): Semantic factors in cognition.Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
83.
SánchezE. (1988). «Aprender a leer, leer para aprender. Características del escolar con pobre capacidad de comprensión».Infancia y Aprendizaje, 44, 35–57.
84.
SánchezE. (1990). «Estructuras textuales y procesos de comprensión: un programa para instruir en la comprensión de textos».Estudios de Psicología, 41, 21–40.
85.
ScardamaliaM.BereiterC. (1984). «Development of strategies in text processing». EnMandlH.SteinN. L.TrabassoT. (eds.): Learning and comprehension of text.Hillsdale. Nueva Jersey: Erlbaum.
86.
ShallertD. L.AlexanderP. A.GoetzE. (1988). «Implicit instruction of strategies for learning from text». EnWeinsteinC. E.GoetzE. T.AlexanderP. A. (eds.): Learning and study strategies.San Diego, C.A.: Academic Press.
87.
SchnotzW. (1984). «Comparative instructional text organization». En H. Mandl, N. L. Stein y T.
88.
SteinN. L.GlennC. G. (1979). «An analysis of story comprehensión in elementary school children». EnFreedleR. O. (ed.): New Directions in Discourse Processing, Vol. 2.Norwood. Nueva Jersey: Ablex.
89.
TaylorB. M. (1980). «Children's memory for expository text after reading».Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 399–411.
90.
TaylorB. M.BeachR. W. (1984). «The effects of text structure instruction on middle grade students comprehension and production of expository text».Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 134–146.
91.
TaylorB. M.SamuelsS. J. (1983). «Children's use of text structure in the recall of expository material».American Educational Research Journal, 20, 517–528.
92.
ThorndykeP. W. (1977). «Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse».Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77–110.
93.
TurnerT. N. (1989). «Using textbook questions intelligently».Social Education, 53, 58–60.
94.
Van DijkT. A. (1979). «Relevance assignment in discourse comprehensión».Discourse Processes, 2, 113–126.
95.
Van DijkT. A. (1980). Macrostructures.Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
96.
Van DijkT. A.KintschW. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension.New York: Academic Press.
97.
Vidal-AbarcaE. (1990). «Un programa para la enseñanza de la comprensión de ideas principales de textos expositivos».Infancia y Aprendizaje, 49, 53–71.
98.
WilhiteS. C. (1986). Multiple-choice text performance: Effects of heading, questions, motivation and type of retention text question. Ponencia presenta en la American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
99.
WinneP. H. (1982). «Minimizing the black box problem to enhaonce the validity of theories about instructional effects».Instructional Sciences, 11, 13–28.
100.
WinneP. H. (1983). «Training students to process text with adjunt aids».Instructional Sciences, 12, 243–266.
101.
WinogradP. N. (1983). Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts.Lexington: University of Kentucky.
