Se analiza el desarrollo de la percepción de la estructura dimensional de estímulos hidimensionales en términos de la integralidad-separabilidad de las dimensiones y las consecuencias que para los estudios sobre el desarrollo de la atención selectiva tiene el desarrollo de la percepción desde modos holisticos a modos analíticos. Se concluye que para estudiar el desarrollo de la atención selectiva es necesario tener en cuenta la naturaleza del estímulo, en función de su estructura dimensional, y sus potenciales efectos diferenciales sobre la estructura percibida por sujetos de diferentes niveles de desarrollo, y ello en relación con las opciones de procesamiento que posibiliten diferentes estructuras percibidas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrunerJ. S.OlverR. R.GreenfieldP. M.Studies in cognitive growth. Wiley, Nueva York, 1966.
2.
BurnsB. B.SheppB. FMcdonoughD.FrlichW.«The relation between stimulus analyzability and perceived dimensional structure». EnBowerG. H. (Ed.): The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. (Vol. 12). Academic Press. Nueva York, 1978.
3.
ClarkE. V.«What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language». EnMooreT. E. (Ed.): Cognitive development and acquisition of language. Academic Pres, Nueva York, 1973.
4.
GarnerW. R.«The stimulus in information processing».American Psychologist, 1970, 25, 350–358.
5.
GarnerW. R.The processing of information and structure. Potomac. Md. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1974.
6.
GarnerW. R.«Interaction of stimulus dimensions in concept and choice processes».Cognitive Psychology, 1976, 8, 98–123.
7.
GarnerW. R.«The analysis of unanalized perceptions.» EnKubovyM.PomerantzJ. R. (Eds.): Perceptual organization. Lawrence Erlbaum. Nueva Jersey, 1981.
8.
GarnerW. R.«Asymmetric interactions of stimulus dimensions in perceptual information processing». EnTigheT. J.SheppB. E. (Eds.): Perception, cognition, and development: Interactional analyses. Lawrence Erlbaum. New Jersey, 1983.
9.
GarnerW. R.FelfoldyG. L.«Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing».Cognitive Psychology, 1970, 1, 225–241.
10.
GibsonE. J.Principles of perceptual learning and development. Appleton-Century Crofts, Nueva York, 1969.
11.
GibsonJ. J.The senses considered as perceptual systems. Hougton Mifflin. Boston, 1966.
12.
HagenJ. W.HaleG. A.«The development of attention in children». EnPickA. (Ed.): Minnesota symposia on child psychology. (Vol. 7). University of Minnesota Press. Minessota, 1973.
13.
InhelderB.PiagetJ.The early growth of logic in the child. Norton. Nueva York, 1974.
14.
KahnemannD.Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall. Nueva Jersey, 1975.
15.
KahnemannD.HenikA.«Perceptual organization and attention». EnKubovyM.PomerantzJ. R. (eds.): Perceptual organisation. Lawrence Erlbaum. Nueva Jersey, 1981.
16.
KemlerD. G.«Classification in young and retarded children: The primacy of overall similarity relations.»Child Development, 1982, 53, 768–779.
17.
KemlerD. G.«Holistic and analytic modes in perceptual and cognitive development». EnTigheT. J.SheppB. E. (Eds.): Perception, cognition, and development: Interactional analyses. Lawrence Erlbaum, Nueva Jersey, 1983.
18.
KemlerD. G.SmithL. B.«Is there a developmental trend from integrality to separability in perception?».Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1978, 26, 498–507.
19.
KendlerH. H.KendlerT. S.«Vertical and horizontal processes in problemsolving».Psychological Review, 1962, 69, 1–16.
20.
KendlerH. H.KendlerT. S.«From discrimination learning to cognitive development: A neobehavioristic Odyssey». EnEstesW. K. (Ed.:): Handbook of learning and cognitive processes. (Vol. 1.) Lawrence Erlbaum, Nueva Jersey, 1975.
21.
KendlerT. S.«Labeling, overtraining and levels of function». EnTigheT. J.SheppB. E. (Eds.): Perception, cognition, and development: Interactional analyses. Lawrence Erlbaum. Nueva Jersey, 1983.
22.
KingW. L.HoltJ. R.«Conjucyive and disjunctive rule learning as a function of age and forced verbalization».Journal of Experimental Child Psycholog), 1970, 10, 100–111.
23.
KrantzT. H.TverskyA.«Similarity of rectangles: An analysis of subjective dimensions».Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1975, 12, 4–34.
24.
KubovyM.PomerantzJ. R. (Eds.): Perceptual organisation. Lawrence Erlbaum. Nueva Jersey, 1981.
25.
LaneD. M.PearsonD. A.«The development of selective attention».Merril Palmer Quarterly, 1982, 28, 317–337.
26.
LockheadG. R.«Visual discrimination and methods of presenting redundant stimuli».Proceedings of the 74th Annual Convention of the A.P.A., 1966, 67,-68.
27.
LockheadG. R.«Processing dimensional stimuli: A note».Psychological Review, 1972, 79, 410–419.
28.
LockheadG. R.KingM. C.«Classifying integral stimuli».Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977, 3, 436–443.
29.
MaccobyE. E.«The development of stimulus selection». EnHillJ. P. (ed.): Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology. (Vol. 3). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1969.
30.
MillerS. A.Developmental investigation of hypotheses in attribute identification. Tesis doctoral no publicada. University of Colorado, 1971.
31.
MonahanJ. S.LockheadG. R.«Identification of integral stimuli».Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1977, 106, 94–110.
32.
NelsonK.«Concept, word, and sentence: Interrelations in acquisition and development».Psychological Review, 1974, 81, 267–285.
33.
PickA. D.FrankelG. W.«A study of strategies of visual attention in children».Developmental Psychology, 1973, 9, 348–358.
34.
RogersJ. C.JohnsonP. J.«Attribute identification in children as a function of stimulus dimensionality».Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1973, 15, 216–221.
35.
RoschE.«On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories». EnMooreT. E. (Ed.): Cognitive developmente and the acquisition of language. Academic Press. Nueva York, 1973.
36.
RoschE.LloydB. B. (Eds.): Cognition and categorisation. Lawrence Erlbaum. Nueva Jersey, 1978.
37.
SherpardR. N.«Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects».Psychometrika, 1974. 39. 373–421.
38.
SheppB. E.The relation between stimulus structure and the developmen of voluntary selective attention. Paper presented at a conference on dimensions judgments by children. Kassel, Germany, 1977.
39.
SheppB. E.«From perceived similarity to dimensional structure: A new hypothesis about perceptual development». EnRoschE.LloydB. B. (Eds.): Cognition and categorisation. Lawrence Erlbaum. Nueva Jersey, 1978.
40.
SheppB. E.«The analyzability of multidimensional objects: Some constraints on perceived structure, the development of perceived structure, and attention». EnTigheT. J.SheppB. E. (Eds.): Perception, Cognition, and development: Interactional analyses. Lawrence Erlbaum. Nueva Jersey, 1983.
41.
SheppB. E.BurnsB.McdonoughD.«The relation of stimulus structure to perceptual and cognitive development: Further tests of a separability hipothesis». EnWilkeningF.BeckerJ.TrabassoP. (Eds.): Information integration by children. Lawrence Erlbaum. Nueva Jersey, 1980.
42.
SheppB. E.SwartzK. B.«Selective attention and the processing of integral and non-integral dimensions: A developmental study».Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1976, 22, 73–85.
43.
SmithL. B.«Perceptual development and category generalization».Child Development, 1979, 50, 705–715.
44.
SmithL. B.«Importance of the overall similarity of objects for adult's and children's classifications».Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981, 7, 811–824.
45.
SmithL. B.KemlerD. G.«Developmental trends in free classification: Evidence for a new conceptualization of perceptual development».Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977, 24, 279–298.
46.
SmithL. B.KemlerD. G.«Levels of experienced dimensionality in children and adults».Cognitive Psychology, 1978, 10, 502–532.
47.
StruttG. F.AndersonT. R.WellA. D.«A developmental study of the effects of irrelevant information on speeded classification».Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1975, 20, 127–135.
48.
TigheT. J.«Subproblem analysis of discrimination learning». EnBowerG. H.The psychology of learning and motivation. (Vol. 7). Academic Press. Nueva York, 1973.
49.
TverskyA.«Features of similarity».Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 327–352.
50.
WardT. B.«Separable and integral responding by children and adults to dimensions of lenght and density».Child Development, 1980, 51, 676–684.
51.
WernerH.Comparative psychology of mental development. (Rev. ed.) Scientific Editions. Nueva York, 1961.
52.
ZeamanD.HanleyP.«Stimulus preferences as structural features». EnTigheT. J.SheppB. E. (Eds.: Perception, cognition, and development: Interactional analyses. Lawrence Erlbaum. Nueva Jersey, 1983.
53.
ZeamanD.HouseB. J.«Interpretations of developmental trends in discriminative transfer effects». EnPickA. D. (Ed.): Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology. (Vol. 8). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1974.
54.
ZeamanD.HouseB. J.«The role of attention in retardate discrimination learning». EnEllisN. R. (Ed.): Handhook of mental deficiency. McGraw Hill. Nueva York, 1963.
