Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Commenting on a note by Steven Pulos, it is argued that a relationship between processing capacity and field independence, reported by Case and Globerson (1974) and Morra and Scopesi (1988), is compatible with the view that field independence tests are also demanding in terms of processing capacity. This does not imply that one should refrain from using a battery of tests in measuring M capacity. It is also noted that our previous research emphasised convergent validity because of current rhetorical needs, and we agree with Pulos that the nature of the relationship between processing capacity and other abilities deserves to be investigated more deeply.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

Baddeley, A.D. , Thomson, N. , & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short term memory . Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 14, 575-589 .

Bereiter, C. , & Scardamalia, M. (1979). Pascual-Leone’s M construct as a link between cognitive-developmental and psychometric concepts of intelligence . Intelligence, 3, 41-63 .

Case, R. (1974). Strictures and structures: some functional limitations on the course of cognitive growth . Cognitive Psychology, 6, 544-573 .

Case, R. , & Globerson, T. (1974). Field dependence and central computing space . Child Development, 45, 772-778 .

Globerson, T. (1983). Mental capacity and cognitive functioning: developmental and social class differences . Developmental Psychology, 19, 225-230 .

Globerson, T. (1989). What is the relationship between cognitive style and cognitive development? In T. Globerson & T. Zelniker (Eds.), Cognitive style and cognitive development (pp. 71-85). Norwood, NJ: Ablex .

Morra, S. (1990, September). Why another model of working memory? Paper presented at the IV Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Como, Italy.

Morra, S. (1994). Issues in working memory measurement: Testing for M capacity . International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 143-159 .

10.

Morra, S. , & Scopesi, A. (1988). La memoria operativa e la sua misurazione . Età Evolutiva, 31, 22-33 .

11.

Morra, S. , & Stoffel, C. (1991, July). A new model of verbal short-term memory and its development . Paper presented at the International Conference on Memory, Lancaster, UK.

12.

Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget’s developmental stages . Acta Psychologica, 63, 301-345 .

13.

Pascual-Leone, J. (1974). A neo-Piagetian process-structural model of Witkin’s differentiation . Paper presented at the conference of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

14.

Pascual-Leone, J. (1989). An organismic process model of Witkin’s field dependence-independence. In T. Globerson & T. Zelniker (Eds.), Cognitive style and cognitive development (pp. 36-70). Norwood, NJ: Ablex .

Issues in Testing for Processing Capacity: Portrait of Convergent Validity with Oblique Rotations in the Background

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References