Early aesthetic choices: Infant preferences for attractive premature infant faces

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that when newborn and young infants are shown attractive and unattractive adult faces they will look longer at the attractive faces. Three studies with infants ranging from 5 months to 15 months were conducted to examine whether this attractiveness effect holds for infants looking at infant faces. A standard preferential looking technique was used in which infants were shown pairs of colour slides of upright (Experiments 1 and 2, n = 16) or inverted (Experiment 3, n = 16) infant faces previously rated by adults for attractiveness. Although Experiment 1 did not reveal an attractiveness effect, this effect did become manifest in Experiment 2 after increasing stimulus exposure time and replacing three of the original stimulus faces. The attractiveness effect was lost when faces were presented upside down. Findings are discussed in relation to the feature-based vs. configural processing debate in the face processing literature and in relation to the notion that attractiveness is based on presexual maturity rather than “cuteness”.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alley, T. R. (1983). Infantile head shape as an elicitor of adult protection . Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 411–427 .

Alley, T. R. (1988). The effects of growth and ageing on facial aesthetics. In T. R. Alley (Ed.), Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces (pp. 51–62). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Bernstein, I. H. , Lin, T. D. , & McClellan, P. (1982). Cross- vs. within racial judgements of attractiveness . Perception and Psychophysics, 32, 495–503 .

Berry, D. S. , & McArthur, L. Z. (1986). Perceiving character in faces: The impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception . Psychological Bulletin, 100, 3–18 .

Bornstein, M. H. , Ferdinandsen, K. , & Gross, C. G. (1981). Perception of symmetry in infancy . Developmental Psychology, 17, 82–86 .

Brace, N. A. , Hole, G. J. , Kemp, R. I. , Pike, G. E. , Van Duuren, M. A. , & Norgate, L. (2001). Developmental changes in the effect of inversion: Using a picture book to investigate face recognition . Perception, 30, 85–94 .

Carey, S. (1978). A case study: Face recognition. In E. Walker (Ed.), Explorations of the biology of language (pp. 175–201). Brighton, UK: Harvester Press .

Carey, S. (1981). The development of face perception. In G. Davies , H. Ellis , & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces. London: Academic Press .

Carey, S. , & Diamond, R. (1994). Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children? Visual Cognition, 1, 253–274 .

10.

Carey, S. , & Diamond, R. (1977). From piecemeal to configurational representations of faces . Science, 195, 312–314 .

11.

Carey, S. , Diamond, R. , & Woods, B. (1980). Development of face recognition: A maturational component? Developmental Psychology, 16, 257–269 .

12.

Cunningham, M.R. , Roberts, R. A. , Barbee, A. P. , Druen, P. B. , & Wu, C. H. (1995). Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261–279 .

13.

Cunningham, M. R. , Roberts, R. A. , Richardson, T. P. , Barbee, A. P. , Wu, C. H. , & Dehart, D. D. (1991). A psycho-evolutionary, multiple-motive interpretation of physical attractiveness . Paper presented at the symposium Sex and Mating: Evolutionary Perspectives, at the 99th annual convention of the APA, San Francisco.

14.

Diamond, R. , & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise . Journal of Experimental Psychology, 115, 107–117 .

15.

Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter .

16.

Elder, G. H. , Nguyen, T. V. , & Gaspi, A. (1985). Linking family hardship to children’s lives. [Special issue: Family development.] . Child Development, 56, 361–375 .

17.

Flin, R. H. (1985). Development of face recognition: An encoding switch? British Journal of Psychology, 76, 123–134 .

18.

George, P. A. , & Hole, G. J. (1998). The influence of feature-based information in the age processing of unfamiliar faces . Perception, 27, 295–312 .

19.

Hess, E. H. (1970). Ethology and developmental psychology. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology, Vol. 1. New York: Wiley .

20.

Hildebrandt, K. A. , & Fitzgerald, H. E. (1979). Facial feature determinants of perceived infant attractiveness . Infant Behaviour and Development, 2, 329–339 .

21.

Hildebrandt, K. A. , & Fitzgerald, H. E. (1983). The infant’s physical attractiveness: Its effect on bonding and attachment . Infant Mental Health Journal, 3, 3–12 .

22.

Iliffe, A. H. (1960). A study of preferences in feminine beauty . British Journal of Psychology, 51, 267–273 .

23.

Johnson, D. F. , & Pittenger, J. B. (1984). Attribution, the attractiveness stereotype, and the elderly . Developmental Psychology, 20, 1168–1172 .

24.

Johnson, M. H. , & Morton, J. (1991). Biology and cognitive development. Oxford, UK: Blackwell .

25.

Johnston, R. A. , & Ellis, H. D. (1995). The development of face recognition. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition. London: Routledge .

26.

Kowner, R. (1996). Facial symmetry and attractiveness judgement in developmental perspective . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 662–675 .

27.

Langlois, J. H. , Kalakanis, L. , Rubenstein, A. J. , Larson, A. , Hallam, M. , & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review . Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423 .

28.

Langlois, J. H. , Ritter, J. M. , Roggman, L. A. , & Vaughn, L. S. (1991). Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces . Developmental Psychology, 27, 79–84 .

29.

Langlois, J. H. , & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average . Psychological Science, 1, 115–121 .

30.

Langlois, J. H. , Roggman, L. A. , & Musselman, L. (1994). What is average and what is not average in attractive faces? Psychological Science, 5, 214–220 .

31.

Lorenz, K. Z. (1943). Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Vererbung . Zietschrift für Tierpsychologie, 5, 235–409 .

32.

Maret, S. M. , & Harling, G. A. (1985). Cross cultural perception of physical attractiveness: Ratings of photos of whites by Cruzans and Americans . Perceptual Motor Skills, 60, 163–166 .

33.

McCabe, V. (1984). Abstract perceptual information for age level: A risk factor for maltreatment? Child Development, 55, 267–276 .

34.

McCabe, V. (1988). Facial proportions, perceived age, and caregiving. In T. R. Alley (Ed.), Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces (pp. 89–96). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

35.

McKelvie, S. J. (1995). Emotional expression in upside-down faces: Evidence for configural and componential processing . British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 325–334 .

36.

Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Infants’ understanding of people and things: From body imitation to folk psychology. In J. L. Bermudez , A. Marcel , & N. Eilan (Ed.), The body and the self (pp. 43–69). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

37.

Patzer, G. L. , & Burke, D. M. (1988). Physical attractiveness and child development. In B. Lahey & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Advances in child psychology, Vol. 11 (pp. 325–368). New York: Plenum Press .

38.

Perrett, D. I. , Burt, D. M. , Penton-Voak, I. S. , Lee, K. J. , Rowland, D. A. , & Edwards, R. (1999). Symmetry and human facial expression . Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 295–307 .

39.

Rhodes, G. , Proffitt, F. , Grady, J. M. , & Sumich, A. (1998). Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty . Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 659–669 .

40.

Rhodes, G. Sumich, A. , & Byatt, G. (1999). Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? Psychological Science, 10, 52–58 .

41.

Samuels, C. A. , Butterworth, G. , Roberts, T. , Grauper, L. , & Hole, G. (1994). Facial aesthetics: Babies prefer attractiveness to symmetry . Perception, 23, 823–831 .

42.

Samuels, C. A. , & Ewy, R. (1985). Aesthetic perception of faces during infancy . British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 221–228 .

43.

Slater, A. , Bremner, G. , Johnson, S. P. , Sherwood, P. , Hayes, R. , & Brown, E. (2000a). Newborn infants’ preference for attractive faces: The role of internal and external facial features . Infancy, 1, 265–274 .

44.

Slater, A. , Quinn, P. , Hayes, R. , & Brown, E. (2000b). The role of orientation in newborn infants’ preferences for attractive faces . Developmental Science, 3, 181–185 .

45.

Slater, A. , Von der Schulenburg, C. , Brown, E. , Badenoch, M. , Butterworth, G. , Parsons, S. , & Samuels, C. (1998). Newborn infants prefer attractive faces . Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 345–354 .

46.

Stevenage, S. V. (1995). Expertise and the character advantage. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition. London: Routledge .

47.

Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition . British Journal of Psychology, 79, 471–491 .

48.

Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces . Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145 .

49.

Zebrowitz, L. A. (1997). Reading faces: Window to the soul? Oxford: Westview Press .

50.

Zebrowitz, L. A. , Montepare, J. M. , & Lee, H. K. (1993). They don’t all look alike: Differentiating same versus other race individuals . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 85–101 .