The present studies analysed drawing as a system rather than a unitary ability. The aim was to investigate whether and which language factors influence drawing performance and drawing development. In two studies of 2- to 11-year-old children drawing as a system of components was investigated. Tests were designed to measure motor output, imagery, memory, perception, and verbal abilities. The analysis of relationships between drawing measures and putative components of a drawing system revealed that all of the proposed components independently affected drawing development. Results of analyses of the data from younger and older children separately suggest that different components of a system are crucial for drawing development at different phases of development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaldwinD.A. (1989). Priorities in children's expectations about object label reference: Form over color.Child Development, 60, 1291–1306.
2.
BaldwinD.A. (1992). Clarifying the role of shape in children's Taxonomic Assumption.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 392–416.
3.
BarnesE. (1893). A study on children's drawings.Pedagogical Seminary, 2(3), 455–463.
4.
BarrettM.D., BeaumontA.V., & JennettM.S. (1985). Some children do sometimes do what they have been told to do: Task demands and verbal instructions in children's drawing. In FreemanN.H., & CoxM.V. (Eds.), Visual order: The nature and development of pictorial representation (pp. 176–187). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BarrettM.D., & BridsonA. (1983). The effect of instructions upon children's drawings.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 175–178.
6.
BensurB., & EliotJ. (1993). Case's developmental model and children's drawings.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 371–375.
7.
BerkL.E. (1992). Children's private speech: An overview of theory and the status of research. In DiazR.M., & BerkL.E. (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 17–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
BrittainW.L., & ChienY.-C. (1983). Relationships between preschool children's ability to name body parts and their ability to construct a man.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 19–24.
9.
BühlerK. (1933). The mental development of the child.London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
10.
CaseR. (1992). The mind's staircase. Exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children's thought and knowledge.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
ChenM.J., & HolmanJ. (1989). Emergence of drawing devices for total and partial occlusion: A longitudinal study.Perception, 18, 445–455.
12.
CoxM.V. (1986). Cubes are difficult things to draw.British Journal of Devevelopmental Psychology, 4, 341–345.
13.
CoxM.V. (1993). Children's drawings of the human figure.Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
14.
CrookC. (1985). Knowledge and appearance. In FreemanN.H., & CoxM.V. (Eds.), Visual order: The nature and development of pictorial representation (pp. 248–265). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
DavisA.M. (1985). The canonical bias: Young children's drawing of familiar objects. In FreemanN.H., & CoxM.V. (Eds.), Visual order: The nature and development of pictorial representation (pp. 202–213). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DouglasG., & RidingR.J. (1994). Cognitive style and gender differences in drawing from memory versus copying in 11-year-old children.Educational Psychology, 14, 493–496.
17.
FreemanN.H. (1987). Current problems in the development of representational picture-production.Archives de Psychologie, 55, 127–152.
18.
GardnerH. (1980). Artful scribbles: The significance of children's drawings.New York: Basic Books.
19.
GardnerH., & WolfD. (1979). First drawings: Notes on the relationships between perception and production in the visual arts. In NodineC.F., & FisherD.F. (Eds.), Perception and pictorial representation (pp. 361–387). New York: Praeger.
20.
GolombC. (1992). The child's creation of a pictorial world.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
21.
GoodenoughF.L. (1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawings.Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book Company.
22.
GoudenaP.P. (1992). The problem of abbreviation and internalization of private speech. In DiazR.M., & BerkL.E. (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 215–224). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
HarrisD.B. (1963). Children's drawings as measures of intellectual maturity. A revision and extension of the Goodenough Draw-a-Man test.New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
24.
JonesS.S., SmithL.B., & LandauB. (1991). Object properties and knowledge in early lexical learning.Child Development, 62, 499–516.
25.
KrascumR., TregenzaC., & WhiteheadP. (1996). Hidden-feature inclusions in children's drawings: The effects of age and model familiarity.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 441–455.
26.
LandauB., SmithL.B., & JonesS.S. (1988). The importance of shape in early lexical learning.Cognitive Development, 3, 299–321.
27.
Lange-KüttnerC., & ReithE. (1995). The transformation of figurative thought: Implications of Piaget and Inhelder's developmental theory for children's drawings. In Lange-KüttnerC., & ThomasG.V. (Eds.), Drawing and looking. Theoretical approaches to pictorial representation in children (pp. 75–92). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
28.
Lange-KüttnerC. (1997). Development of size modification of human figure drawings in spatial axes systems of varying complexity.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 264–278.
29.
Lange-KüttnerC. (1998). Pressure, velocity, and time in speeded drawing of basic graphic patterns by young children.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 1299–1310.
30.
LeeM. (1989). When an object is not an object? The effect of ‘meaning’ upon the copying of line drawings.British Journal of Psychology, 80, 15–37.
31.
LewisC., RussellC., & BerridgeD. (1993). When is a mug not a mug? Effects of content, naming, and instruction on children's drawings.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 291–302.
32.
LightP. (1985). The development of view-specific representation considered from a socio-cognitive point of view. In FreemanN.H., & CoxM.V. (Eds.), Visual order: The nature and development of pictorial representation (pp. 214–230). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
LittL. (1977). Naming of parts: How children describe and how children draw common objects. In ButterworthG. (Ed.), The child's representation of the world (pp. 73–80). New York: Plenum.
34.
LukensH.T. (1896). A study of children's drawings in the early years.Pedagogical Seminary, 4, 79–110.
35.
LuquetG.-H. (1927). Le dessin enfantin.Paris: Libraire Felix Alcan.
36.
LuriaA.R. (1969). Vyshije korkovyje funktsii tsheloveka i ikh narushenija pri lokal'nykh porazenijakh mozga [Higher cortical functions in man and their disturbances in local brain lesions]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta
37.
MarkmanE.M. (1976). Children's difficulty with word-referent differentiation.Child Development, 47, 742–749.
38.
MartlewM., & ConnollyK.J. (1996). Human figure drawings by schooled and unschooled children in Papua New Guinea.Child Development, 67, 2743–2762.
39.
MatthewsJ. (1984). Children drawing: Are young children really scribbling?Early Child Development and Care, 18, 1–39.
40.
MatthewsJ. (1994). Helping children to draw and paint in early childhood. Children and visual representation.London: Hodder & Stoughton.
41.
McCloskeyP. (1995). The relationship between children's drawings of rectangular solids from memory and performance in cognitive tests, art and practical subjects.Educational Psychology, 15, 3–10.
42.
Meili-DworetzkiG. (1957). Das Bild des Menschen in der Vorstellung und Darstellung des Kleinkindes.Bern: Hans Huber.
43.
MilbrathC. (1998). Patterns of artistic development in children. Comparative studies of talentCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
MorraS., AngiA., & TomatL. (1996). Planning, encoding, and overcoming conflict in partial occlusion drawing: A neo-Piagetian model and an experimental analysis.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 276–301.
45.
MuthenL.K., & MuthenB.O. (1998). Mplus. The comprehensive modelling program for applied researchers.Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.
46.
NelsonK. (1996). Language in cognitive development.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
NichollsA., & KennedyJ.M. (1992). Drawing development: From similarity of features to direction.Child Development, 63, 227–241.
48.
PhillipsW.A., InallM., & LauderE. (1985). On the discovery, storage and use of graphic descriptions. In FreemanN.H., & CoxM.V. (Eds.), Visual order: The nature and development of pictorial representation (pp. 122–134). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
PiagetJ., & InhelderB. (1956). The child's conception of space.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
50.
PiagetJ., & InhelderB. (1969). The psychology of the child.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
51.
PicardD., & VinterA. (1999). Representational flexibility in children's drawings: Effects of age and verbal instructions.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 605–622.
52.
PrattF. (1985). A perspective on traditional artistic practices. In FreemanN.H., & CoxM.V. (Eds.), Visual order: The nature and development of pictorial representation (pp. 32–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53.
ReithE. (1988). The development of use of contour lines in children's drawings of figurative and non-figurative three-dimensional models.Archives de Psychologie, 56, 83–103.
54.
ReithE. (1990). Development of representational awareness and performance in drawing production.Archives de Psychologie, 58, 369–379.
55.
ReithE., & DomininD. (1997). The development of children's ability to attend to the visual projection of objects.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 177–196.
56.
RicciC. (1911). Lasten taide (L'arte dei bambini, Finnish transl.). Porvoo: Werner Söderström. (Original work published 1887)
57.
RobertsB. (1992). The evolution of the young child's concept of word as a unit of spoken and written language.Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 125–138.
58.
RommetveitR. (1986). Language acquisition as increasing linguistic structuring of experience and symbolic behavior control. In WertschJ.V. (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 183–204). Cambride, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
RussellJ., & MaxwellM. (1980). Children's water-level drawing: A problem of ignoring internal frameworks?Perceptual and Motor Skills, 51, 1001–1002.
60.
SittonR., & LightP. (1992). Drawing to differentiate: Flexibility in young children's human figure drawings.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 25–33.
61.
SmithL.B., JonesS.S., & LandauB. (1992). Count nouns, adjectives, and perceptual properties in children's novel word interpretations.Developmental Psychology, 28, 273–286.
62.
StetsenkoA. (1995). The psychological function of children's drawing: a Vygotskian perspective. In Lange-KüttnerC., & ThomasG.V. (Eds.), Drawing and looking. Theoretical approaches to pictorial representation in children (pp. 147–158). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
63.
SuttonP.J., & RoseD.H. (1998). The role of strategic visual attention in children's drawing development.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 87–107.
64.
TallandiniM.A., & ValentiniP. (1991). Symbolic prototypes in children's drawings of schools.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 152, 179–190.
65.
TannerA.E. (1915). The child. His thinking, feeling, and doing.Chicago, IL: Rand McNally & Company.
66.
ThomasG.V., & SilkA.M.J. (1990). An introduction to the psychology of children's drawings.New York: New York University Press.
67.
ToomelaA. (1996). How culture transforms mind: A process of internalization.Culture and Psychology, 2, 285–305.
68.
ToomelaA. (1999a). Developmental stages in children's drawings of a cube and a doll. Manuscript submitted for publication.
69.
ToomelaA. (1999b). Drawing development: Stages in the representation of a cube and a cylinder.Child Development, 70, 1141–1150.
70.
ToomelaA. (in press). Culture as a semiosphere: On the role of culture in culture-individual relationship. In JosephsI.E., & ValsinerJ. (Eds.), Dialogicality in development.New York: Elsevier.
71.
TulvisteT. (1993). The function of differentiating between a word and its referent.Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 31, 27–39.
72.
van SommersP. (1984). Drawing and cognition. Descriptive and experimental studies of graphic production processes.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
73.
van SommersP. (1995). Observational, experimental and neuropsychological studies of drawing. In Lange-KüttnerC., & ThomasG.V. (Eds.), Drawing and looking. Theoretical approaches to pictorial representation in children (pp. 44–61). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
74.
VinterA. (1999). How meaning modifies drawing behavior in children.Child Development, 70, 33–49.
75.
von BertalanffyL. (1968). General systems theory. Foundations, development, applications.New York: George Braziller.
76.
VygotskyL.S. (1994). The problem of the cultural development of the child. In van der VeerR., & ValsinerJ. (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 57–72). Oxford, UK: Blackwell
77.
VygotskyL.S. (1996). Myshlenije i rech [Thinking and speech]. Moscow: Labirint. (Original work published 1934)
78.
VygotskyL., & LuriaA. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In van der VeerR., & ValsinerJ. (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99–174). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. (Original work published 1930)
79.
WernerH. (1948). Comparative psychology of mental development.New York: International Universities Press.
