This study examined the relationship between adolescents’ prosocial
problem-solving strategies and prosocial behaviour, and their associations with
social acceptance among their peers. Age- and gender-related variance was also
examined. The subjects were 777 14-year-old adolescents (381 girls and 396 boys) and
877 17-year-olds (464 girls and 413 boys). Prosocial problem-solving strategies were
measured by means of a self-rating questionnaire, while prosocial behaviour and
social acceptance were evaluated in terms of the dimensions of social popularity and
rejection as well as the classification of adolescents into popular, rejected,
neglected, controversial, and average status groups, on the basis of peer
nominations. The results showed that prosocial problem-solving strategies and
prosocial behaviour were only minimally related, but both predicted social
acceptance among peers. The rejected adolescents had low levels and the
controversial adolescents high levels of both prosocial strategies and behaviour,
while the popular and neglected adolescents did not differ from the average ones in
terms of strategies, but they did in their behaviour. The popular adolescents had a
high level, and the neglected adolescents a low level of prosocial behaviour. As a
dimension, social popularity correlated positively and rejection negatively with
prosocial behaviour but not with strategies. Analysis of gender and age differences
revealed that the girls and the 14-year-olds achieved higher scores on both
prosocial strategies and behaviour than the boys or the 17-year-olds. The results
extend our knowledge of adolescent social functioning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, G.R.
, &
Gullotta, T.
(1989). Adolescent life experiences (2nd ed.).
Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole
.
2.
Asarnow, J.R.
, &
Callan, J.W.
(1985).
Boys with peer adjustment problems: Social cognitive processes
. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53,
80–87
.
3.
Bandura, A.
(1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and
action. In
W.M. Kurtines
&
J.L. Gewirtz
(Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Vol. 1.
Theory.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
.
4.
Boivin, M.
, &
Hymel, S.
(1997).
Peer experiences and social self-perceptions: A sequential model
. Developmental Psychology, 33,
135–145
.
5.
Brochin, H.A.
, &
Wasik, B.H.
(1992).
Social problem-solving among popular and unpopular children
. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 20,
377–391
.
6.
Carlo, G.
,
Koller, S.H.
,
Eisenberg, N.
,
Da Silva, M.S.
, &
Frohlich, C.B.
(1996).
A cross-national study on the relations among prosocial moral reasoning,
gender role orientations, and prosocial behaviors
. Developmental Psychology, 32,
231–240
.
7.
Coie, J.D.
, &
Dodge, K.A.
(1988).
Multiple sources of data on social behavior and social status in the
school: A cross-age comparison
. Child Development, 59,
815–829
.
8.
Coie, J.D.
,
Dodge, K.A.
, &
Cappotelli, H.
(1982).
Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective
. Developmental Psychology, 18,
557–570
.
9.
Crick, N.R.
, &
Dodge, K.A.
(1994).
A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in
children’s social adjustment
. Psychological Bulletin, 115,
74–101
.
10.
Crick, N.R.
, &
Ladd, G.W.
(1993).
Children’s perceptions of their peer experiences: Attributions,
loneliness, social anxiety, and social avoidance
. Developmental Psychology, 29,
244–254
.
11.
Cross, S.E.
, &
Madson, L.
(1997).
Models of the self: Self-construals and gender
. Psychological Bulletin, 122,
5–37
.
12.
Damon, W.
(1983). Social and personality development: Infancy through
adolescence.
New York: Norton
.
13.
Denham, S.A.
, &
Holt, R.W.
(1993).
Preschoolers’ likability as cause or consequence of their social behavior
. Developmental Psychology, 29,
271–275
.
14.
Denham, S.A.
,
McKinley, M.
,
Couchoud, E.A.
, &
Holt, R.
(1990).
Emotional and behavioral predictors of preschool peer ratings
. Child Development, 61,
1145–1152
.
15.
Dodge, K.A.
(1983).
Behavioral antecedent s of peer status
. Child Development, 54,
1386–1399
.
16.
Dodge, K.A.
,
Coie, J.D.
,
Pettit, G.S.
, &
Price, J.M.
(1990).
Peer status and aggression in boys’ groups: Developmental and
contextual analyses
. Child Development, 61,
1289–1309
.
17.
Dodge, K.A.
, &
Crick, N.R.
(1990).
Social information-processing bases of aggressive behavior in children
. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15,
8–22
.
18.
Eisenberg, N.
,
Carlo, G.
,
Murphy, B.
, &
Van Court, P.
(1995).
Prosocial development in late adolescence: A longitudinal study
. Child Development, 66,
1179–1197
.
19.
Eisenberg, N.
, &
Fabes, R.A.
(1998). Prosocial development. In
W. Damon
(Series ed.),
N. Eisenberg
(Volume ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and
personality development (5th ed., Vol. 3, pp.
701–778).
New York: Wiley
.
20.
Eisenberg, N.
,
Miller, P.A.
,
Shell, R.
,
McNalley, S.
, &
Shea, C.
(1991).
Prosocial development in adolescence: A longitudinal study
. Developmental Psychology, 27,
849–857
.
21.
Gavin, L.A.
, &
Furman, W.
(1989).
Age differences in adolescents’ perceptions of their peer groups
. Developmental Psychology, 25,
827–834
.
Harris, J.R.
(1995).
Where is the child’s environment? A group socialization theory of development
. Psychological Review, 102,
458–489
.
24.
Hay, D.F.
(1994).
Prosocial development
. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied
Disciplines, 35,
29–71
.
25.
Hertz-Lazarowitz, R.
,
Fuchs, I.
,
Sharabany, R.
, &
Eisenberg, N.
(1989).
Students’ interactive and noninteractiv e behaviors in the
classroom: A comparison between two types of classroom in the city and the
Kibbutz in Israel
. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14,
22–32
.
26.
Huesmann, L.R.
(1988).
An information-processing model for the development of aggression
. Aggressive Behavior, 14,
13–24
.
27.
Huesmann, L.R.
, &
Eron, L.D.
(1989).
Individual differences and the trait of aggression
. European Journal of Personality, 3,
95–106
.
28.
Keltikangas-Järvinen, L.
, &
Kangas, P.
(1988).
Problem-solving strategies in aggressive and nonaggressive children
. Aggressive Behavior, 14,
255–264
.
29.
Keltikangas-Järvinen, L.
, &
Terav, T.
(1996).
Social decision-making strategies in individualistic and collectivistic
cultures—A comparison of Finnish and Estonian adolescents
. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27,
714–732
.
30.
Ladd, G.W.
(1983).
Social networks of popular, average, and rejected children in school settings
. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29,
283–307
.
31.
Lagerspetz, K.M.J.
,
Björkqvist, K.
, &
Peltonen, T.
(1988).
Is indirect aggression typical of females? Gender difference s in
aggressiveness in 11- to 12-year-old children
. Aggressive Behavior, 14,
403–414
.
32.
Lancelotta, G.X.
&
Vaughn, S.
(1989).
Relation between types of aggression and sociometric status: Peer and
teacher perceptions
. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81,
86–90
.
33.
Lindeman, M.
,
Harakka, T.
, &
Keltikangas-Järvinen, L.
(1997).
Aggression, prosociality and withdrawal as social problem-solving
strategies in adolescence
. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26,
339–351
.
34.
Lochman, J.E.
,
Burch, P.R.
,
Curry, J.F.
, &
Lampron, L.B.
(1984).
Treatment and generalization effects of cognitive-behaviora l and
goal-setting interventions with aggressive boys
. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52,
915–916
.
35.
Lochman, J.E.
, &
Dodge, K.A.
(1994).
Social-cognitiv e processes of severely violant, moderately aggressive, and
nonaggressive boys
. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62,
366–374
.
36.
Mischel, W.
, &
Shoda, Y.
(1995).
A cognitive-affectiv e system theory of personality: Reconceptualizin g
situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure
, Psychological Review, 102,
246–268
.
37.
Newcomb, A.F.
,
Bukowski, W.M.
&
Pattee, L.
(1993).
Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular,
rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status
. Psychological Bulletin, 113,
99–128
.
38.
Ollendick, T.H.
,
Weist, M.D.
,
Borden, M.C.
, &
Greene, R.W.
(1992).
Sociometric status and academic, behavioral and psychological adjustment: A
five-year longitudinal study
. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60,
80–87
.
39.
Pakaslahti, L.
, &
Keltikangas-Järvinen, L.
(1996).
Social acceptance and the relationship between aggressive problem-solving
and aggressive behaviour in 14-year-old adolescents
. European Journal of Personality, 10,
265–278
.
40.
Pakaslahti, L.
, &
Keltikangas-Järvinen, L.
(1998).
Types of aggressive behavior among aggressive-preferred, aggressive
non-preferred, non-aggressive preferred and non-aggressive non-preferred
14-year-old adolescents
. Personality and Individual Differences, 24,
821–828
.
41.
Pakaslahti, L.
, &
Keltikangas-Järvinen, L.
(in press). Peer-attributed prosocial behavior among
aggressive/preferred, aggressive/non-preferred, non-aggres sive/preferred and
non-aggressive/non-preferred adolescents. Personality and
Individual Differences.
42.
Paulhus, D.L.
(1989). Socially desirable responding: Some new solutions
to old problem. In
D.M. Buss
&
N. Cantor
(Eds.), Personality psychology: recent trends and emerging
directions (pp. 201–209).
New York: Springer
.
43.
Pombeni, M.L.
,
Kirchler, E.
, &
Palmonari, A.
(1990).
Identification with peers as a strategy to muddle through the troubles of
the adolescent years
. Journal of Adolescence, 13,
351–369
.
44.
Pope, A.W.
,
Bierman, K.L.
, &
Mumma, G.H.
(1991).
Aggression, hyperactivity, and inattention-immaturity: Behavior dimensions
associated with peer rejection in elementary school boys
. Developmental Psychology, 27,
663–671
.
45.
Putallaz, M.
(1983).
Predicting children’s sociometric status from their behavior
. Child Development, 54,
1417–1426
.
46.
Quiggle, N.L.
,
Garber, J.
,
Panak, W.F.
, &
Dodge, K.A.
(1992).
Social information processing in aggressive and depressed children
. Child Development, 63,
1305–1320
.
47.
Radke-Yarrow, M.
,
Zahn-Waxler, C.
, &
Chapman, M.
(1983). Children’s prosocial dispositions and
behavior. In
P.H. Mussen
(Series ed.),
E.M. Hetherington
(Volume ed.), Handbook of child psychology: socialization, personality
and social development (4th ed., Vol. 3).
New York: Wiley
.
48.
Rubin, K.H.
,
Bukowski, W.
, &
Parker, J.G.
(1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and
groups. In
W. Damon
(Series ed.),
N. Eisenberg
(Volume ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and
personality development (5th ed., Vol. 3, pp.
619–700).
New York: Wiley
.
49.
Rubin, K.H.
, &
Daniels-Beirness, T.
(1983).
Concurrent and predictive correlates of sociometric status in kindergarten
and grade 1 children
. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29,
337–351
.
Taylor, S.E.
, &
Brown, J.D.
(1988).
Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
. Psychological Bulletin, 103,
193–210
.
54.
Terry, R.
, &
Coie, J.D.
(1991).
A comparison of methods for defining sociometric status among children
. Developmental Psychology, 27,
867–880
.
55.
Tryon, A.S.
, &
Keane, S.P.
(1991).
Popular and aggressive boys’ initial social interaction patterns
in cooperative and competitive settings
. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19,
395–406
.
56.
Wentzel, K.R.
, &
Erdley, C.A.
(1993).
Strategies for making friends: Relations to social behavior and peer
acceptance in early adolescence
. Developmental Psychology, 29,
819–826
.
57.
Wood, W.
, &
Karten, S.J.
(1986).
Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex
differences in competence
. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50,
341–347
.
