This study examined the retention of students who listened to podcasts of a primary source to the retention of students who read the source as text. We also assessed students' preferences and study habits. Quiz scores revealed that the podcast group performed more poorly than did students who read the text. Although students initially preferred podcasts, their preferences changed immediately after the quiz. Podcasts might be a useful tool to supplement or enrich course-related material, but they are not as effective as text for delivering primary content.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1074.
2.
CampbellG. (2005). There's something in the air: Podcasting in education. Educause Review, 40, 32–47.
3.
DeLoacheJ. S. (2006). Mindful of symbols. Scientific American Mind, 17(1), 71–75.
4.
DixonR. A.SimonE. W.NowakC. A.HultschD. F. (1982). Text recall in adulthood as a function of level of information, input modality, and delay interval. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 358–364.
DunningD.JohnsonK.EhrlingerJ.KrugerJ. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83–87.
7.
EvansC. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50, 491–498.
8.
GreenR. (1981). Remembering ideas from text: The effect of modality of presentation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 83–89.
9.
GurungR. A. R. (2003). Pedagogical aids and student performance. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 92–95.
10.
GurungR. A. R. (2004). Pedagogical aids: Learning enhancers or dangerous detours. Teaching of Psychology, 31, 164–166.
11.
GurungR. A. R.DanielD. B. (2005). Do text-based pedagogical features enhance student learning? In DunnD. S.ChewS. L. (Eds.), Best practices for teaching introduction to psychology (pp. 41–55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
HildyardA.OlsonD. R. (1982). On the comprehension and memory of oral v. written discourse. In TannenD. (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 19–33). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
RickheitG.StrohnerH.MüsselerJ.NattkemperD. (1987). Recalling oral and written discourse. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 438–444.
15.
Rosell-AguilarF. (2007). Top of the pods—In search of a podcasting “pedagogy” for language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 471–492.
16.
SannomiyaM. (1982). The effect of presentation modality on text memory as a function of difficulty level. Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science, 1, 85–90.
17.
SannomiyaM. (1984). The modality effect on text processing as a function of presentation rate. Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science, 3, 17–20.
18.
WespR.MieleJ. (2008). Student opinion of the quality of teaching activities poorly predicts pedagogical effectiveness. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 360–362.
