Students in research methods courses, especially those taught in an intense format, might be hard pressed to actually conduct research studies due to logistics and time constraints. I describe the use of single-case research design and a personalized behavior project as an alternative research project for students in an undergraduate psychology methods course. Students were able to complete the project, including the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, within the confines of an intensive, 6-week course.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BermanE. M. (1995). Implementing TQM in state welfare agencies. Administration in Social Work, 19, 55–72.
2.
CallahanC. D.BarisaM. T. (2005). Statistical process control and rehabilitation outcome: The single-subject design reconsidered. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 24–33.
3.
CareyR. G.LloydR. C. (1995). Measuring quality improvement in healthcare: A guide to statistical process control applications. New York: Quality Resources.
4.
FisherW. W.KelleyM. E.LomasJ. E. (2003). Visual aids and structured criteria for improving inspection and interpretation of single-case designs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 387–406.
5.
HartM. K.HartR. F. (2002). Statistical process control for health care. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
6.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
LearyM. R. (2008). Introduction to behavioral research methods (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
8.
MengesR. J.DobroskiB. J. (1977). Behavioral self-modification in instructional settings: A review. Teaching of Psychology, 4, 168–173.
9.
MorganD. L.MorganR. K. (2001). Single-participant research design: Bringing science to managed care. American Psychologist, 56, 119–127.
10.
MorganD. L.MorganR. K. (2009). Single-case research methods for the behavioral and health sciences. Los Angeles: Sage.
11.
OrmeJ. G.CoxM. E. (2001). Analyzing single-subject design data using statistical process control charts. Social Work Research, 25, 115–127.
12.
ParkerR. I.BrossartD. F. (2003). Evaluating single-case research data: A comparison of seven statistical methods. Behavior Therapy, 34, 189–211.
13.
ParkerR. I.Hagan-BurkeS. (2007). Useful effect size interpretations for single case research. Behavior Therapy, 38, 95–105.
14.
PfadtA.WheelerD. J. (1995). Using statistical process control to make data-based clinical decisions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 349–370.
15.
RottinghausP. J.GaffeyA. R.BorgenF. H.RalstonC. A. (2006). Diverse pathways of psychology majors: Vocational interests, self-efficacy, and intentions. Career Development Quarterly, 55, 85–93.
16.
ShewhartW. A. (1931). Economic control of quality of manufactured product. New York: Van Nostrand.
17.
SidmanM. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York: Basic Books.
18.
YoderJ. D.HochevarC. M. (2005). Encouraging active learning can improve students' performance on examinations. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 91–95.
