For 6 years, we have offered an integrated weekly laboratory focusing on research methods as part of our general psychology course. Through self-report measures and controlled comparisons, we found that laboratory projects significantly increase students' knowledge and comfort level with scientific approaches and concepts, sustain interest in psychology, and increase critical thinking about psychological research. Implementing a laboratory component in the introductory course increases students' scientific literacy, reinforces psychology's claim to scientific status, encourages active learning, promotes quantitative reasoning, and benefits multiple constituencies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllowayT.WilsonG.GrahamJ.KramesL. (2000). Sniffy the virtual rat (Lite version) [Book and computer software]. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
2.
American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
BalchW. R. (2006). Introducing psychology students to research methodology: A word-pleasantness experiment. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 132–134.
4.
BantaT. J. (1970). Tests for the evaluation of early childhood education: The Cincinnati Autonomy Test Battery (CATB). In HellmuthJ. (Ed.), Cognitive studies (Vol. 1, pp. 424–490). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
5.
BenjaminL. T.Jr. (1991). Personalization and active learning in the large introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 18, 68–74.
6.
BenjaminL. T.Jr. (2000). The psychology laboratory at the turn of the 20th century. American Psychologist, 55, 318–321.
7.
BertholdH. C.HakalaC. M.GoffD. (2003). An argument for a laboratory in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 55–58.
8.
BowmanL. L.WaiteB. M. (2003). Volunteering in research: Student satisfaction and educational benefits. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 102–106.
9.
BrothenT. (1984). Three computer-assisted laboratory exercises for introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 11, 105–107.
ElmesD. G. (2002). Laboratory courses for undergrads: Benefits are clear. APS Observer, 15(7), 13, 40.
12.
FaiolaA.FernandezA.GladK.McGrayA.McNearE. (2003, April). The effects of the laboratory experience on undergraduate laboratory instructors. Poster presented at Minnesota Academy of Science, St. Paul, MN.
13.
FallahiC. R.WoodR. M.AustadC. S.FallahiH. (2006). A program for improving undergraduate psychology students' basic writing skills. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 171–175.
14.
FriedrichJ. (1990). Learning to view psychology as a science: Self-persuasion through writing. Teaching of Psychology, 17, 23–27.
15.
GoolkasianP.LeeJ. A. (1988). A computerized laboratory for general psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 15, 98–100.
16.
HailstorksR. (2007). Teaching the science of psychology in the introductory course. Psychology Teacher Network, 17(1), 17, 23.
17.
HalonenJ. S.BosackT.ClayS.McCarthyM.DunnD. S.HillG. W.IVMcEntarfferR.MehrotraC.NesmithR.WeaverK. A.WhitlockK. (2003). A rubric for learning, teaching, and assessing scientific inquiry in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 196–208.
HockR. R. (2002). Forty studies that changed psychology: Explorations into the history of psychological research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
HoganT. P.NorcrossJ. C.CannonJ. T.KarpiakC. P. (2007). Working with and training undergraduates as teaching assistants. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 187–190.
21.
KazmerskiV. A.BlaskoD. G. (1999). Teaching observational research in introductory psychology: Computerized and lecture-based methods. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 295–298.
22.
KiernieskyN. C. (2005). Undergraduate research in small psychology departments: Two decades later. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 84–90.
23.
KohnA.BrillM. (1981). An introductory demonstration laboratory produced entirely by undergraduates. Teaching of Psychology, 8, 133–138.
24.
KoschmannN.WespR. (2001). Using a dining facility as an introductory psychology research laboratory. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 105–108.
25.
LawsonT. J. (1999). Assessing psychological critical thinking as a learning outcome for psychology majors. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 207–209.
26.
LutskyN. (2006). Teaching quantitative reasoning. How to make psychology statistically significant. APS Observer, 19(3), 35–38.
27.
McGovernT. V.HogsheadD. L. (1990). Learning about writing, thinking about teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 17, 5–10.
28.
MillerB.GentileB. F. (1998). Introductory course content and goals. Teaching of Psychology, 25, 89–96.
29.
MurrayF. S.PasternackT. L.RoweF. B. (1972). An informal, self-scheduled laboratory for introductory psychology in a small, liberal arts college. American Psychologist, 27, 1200–1201.
30.
NathansonC.PaulhusD. L.WilliamsK. M. (2004). The challenge to cumulative learning: Do introductory courses actually benefit advanced students. Teaching of Psychology, 31, 5–9.
31.
NewcombA. F.BagwellC. L. (1997). Collaborative learning in an introduction to psychological science laboratory: Undergraduate teaching fellows teach to learn. Teaching of Psychology, 24, 88–95.
32.
PerlmanB.McCannL. I. (1999). The structure of the psychology undergraduate curriculum. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 171–176.
33.
RennerM. J.MackinR. S. (1998). A life stress instrument for classroom use. Teaching of Psychology, 25, 46–48.
34.
RosellM. C.BeckD. M.LutherK. E.GoedertK. M.ShoreW. J.AndersonD. D. (2005). The pedagogical value of experimental participation paired with course content. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 95–99.
35.
RowlandD. L.KaarianenA.HoutsmullerE. J. (2000). Interactions between physiological and affective arousal: A laboratory exercise for psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 34–37.
36.
SchwartzS. (2004). Time to bid goodbye to the psychology lecture. The Psychologist, 17(1), 26–27.
37.
ShimoffE.CataniaA. C.MatthewsB. A. (2000). Psychology on a disc (Version 4.01) [Computer software]. Columbia, MD: CMS Academic Software.
