Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This activity offers a way to use the informed consent procedure to help students better understand the responsibilities of research participants. During a class activity, students completed a brief study. The study included presentation of consent forms and questionnaires before a surprise quiz over material from the consent form and a discussion about research ethics. Although students in the class performed poorly on this quiz, evaluations completed by researchers conducting studies within the department indicated that these students demonstrated greater attention to consent forms when completing actual research than did study participants who did not experience this activity. By preparing students to be engaged research participants, this activity helps researchers intentionally link students' participation to their classroom experiences.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association. (2007). APA guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved December 12, 2007, from http://www.apa.org/ed/psymajor_guideline.pdf.

Belmont Report. (1979). U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Washington, DC. Retrieved December 16, 2007, from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm.

Cacioppo

J. T.

Petty

R. E.

(1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.

English

D. C.

(2002). Valid informed consent: A process, not a signature. The American Surgeon, 68, 45–48.

Hoyle

R. H.

Stephenson

M. T.

Palmgreen

Lorch

E. P.

Donohew

R. L.

(2002). Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 401–414.

Länsimies-Antikainen

Pietilä

Laitinen

Schwab

Rauramaa

Länsimies

(2007). Evaluation of informed consent: A pilot study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 59, 146–154.

Perlman

McCann

L. I.

(2005). Undergraduate research experiences in psychology: A national study of courses and curricula. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 5–14.

Sears

D. O.

(1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530.

Sieber

J. E.

(1999). What makes a subject pool (un)ethical? In Chastain

Landrum

R. E.

(Eds.), Protecting human subjects: Departmental subject pools and institutional review boards (pp. 43–64). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

10.

Strahan

Gerbasi

K. C.

(1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193.

11.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1993). Office of Human Research Protection institutional review board guidebook (chap 3.b). Retrieved March 28, 2008, from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/irb/irb_chapter3.

12.

Wintre

M. G.

North

Sugar

L. A.

(2001). Psychologists' response to criticisms about research based on undergraduate participants: A developmental perspective. Canadian Psychology, 42, 216–225.

Developing Informed Research Participants in an Introductory Psychology Participant Pool

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References