Discipline-based learning communities have become a popular strategy for improving student performance and satisfaction. This article describes the goals and features of a university-based, first-year psychology learning community (PLC) implemented in Fall 2003. We also report the results of a longitudinal assessment of the impact of the PLC on student retention and progression, academic performance, cocurricular involvement, and satisfaction with the major. Finally, we discuss the benefits and challenges of implementing a PLC.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association. (2003). Assessment cyberguide. Washington, DC: APA Educational Directorate Task Force. Retrieved December 2, 2006, from http://www.apa.org/ed/guidehomepage.html.
2.
BrewerC. L.HopkinsJ. R.KimbleG. A.MatlinM. W.McCannL. I.McNeilO. V.NodineB. F.QuinnV. N.Saundra (1993). Curriculum. In McGovernT. V. (Ed.), Handbook for enhancing undergraduate education in psychology (pp. 161–182). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3.
ChickeringA. W.GamsonZ. F. (1987). Seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39, 3–7.
4.
KutherT. L. (2003). The psychology major's handbook. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
5.
TaylorK. (2004). Learning community research and assessment: What we know now. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
6.
TintoV. (2000). What we have learned about the impact of learning communities on students. Assessment Update, 12(2), 1–2, 12.
7.
ZhaoC. M.KuhG. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45, 115–138.
