Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We tested the effects of instructional method (lecture vs. mastery) and aptitude (high, medium, low GPA levels) on students' academic performance and achievement motivation goals. Students enrolled in a developmental psychology course received either traditional lecture or mastery (Keller's Personalized System of Instruction [PSI]) instruction. PSI students ended the semester with higher final examination scores than lecture students; the difference was greatest for the lowest GPA group. Low-aptitude PSI students showed increases in learning goals over time when compared to low-aptitude lecture students. The academic performance and learning goals of PSI students with the lowest grade point averages (GPAs) approached those of lecture students with the highest GPAs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bloom

B. S

. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1(Whole No. 2).

Bloom

B. S.

Madaus

G. F.

Hastings

J. T

. (1981). Evaluation to improve learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Buskist

Cush

DeGrandpre

R. J

. (1991). The life and times of PSI. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 215–234.

Cross

M. Z.

Semb

. (1976). An analysis of the effects of personalized instruction on students at different initial performance levels in an introductory college nutrition course. Journal of Personalized Instruction, 1, 47–50.

Dweck

C. S

. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis/Psychology Press.

Dweck

C. S.

Leggett

E. L

. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.

Eppler

M. A.

Carson-Plentl

Harju

B. L

. (2000). Achievement goals, failure attributions, and achievement performance in nontraditional and traditional college students. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15, 353–372.

Graham

R. B

. (1999). Unannounced quizzes raise test scores selectively for mid-range students. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 271–273.

Johnson

W. G.

Croft

R. G. F

. (1975). Locus of control and participation in a personalized system of instruction course. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 416–421.

10.

Johnston

J. M.

O'Neill

. (1973). The analysis of performance criteria defining course grades as a determinant of college student academic performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 261–268.

11.

Keller

F. S

. (1968). “Good-bye, teacher.” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 79–89.

12.

Koestner

Zuckerman

. (1994). Causality orientations, failure, and achievement. Journal of Personality, 62, 321–346.

13.

Kulik

J. A.

Jaksa

Kulik

C.-L. C

. (1978). Research on component features of Keller's personalized system of instruction. Journal of Personalized Instruction, 3, 2–14.

14.

Kulik

J. A.

Kulik

C.-L. C.

Cohen

P. A

. (1979). A meta-analysis of outcome studies of Keller's personalized system of instruction. American Psychologist, 34, 307–318.

15.

Morris

C. J.

Kimbrell

G. M

. (1977). Individual differences and PSI: A re-analysis. Journal of Personalized Instruction, 2, 47–49.

16.

O'Dell

Hoyert

. (2001, April). Goal orientation and challenge in college students. In M. Ironsmith & M. A. Eppler (Chairs), Toward a scholarship of teaching and learning in developmental psychology. Symposium conducted at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MN.

17.

Pascarella

E. T.

Terenzini

P. T

. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

18.

Roedel

T. D.

Schraw

Plake

B. S

. (1994). Validation of a measure of learning and performance goal orientations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 1013–1021.

19.

Roediger

H. L.

Karpicke

J. D

. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255.

20.

Schraw

Horn

Thorndike-Christ

Bruning

. (1995). Academic goal orientations and student classroom achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 359–368.

Mastery Learning Benefits Low-Aptitude Students

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References