Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Instructors across disciplines continue to seek methods to improve students' retention of class material. One potential method for increasing retention is the use of collaborative, or group, testing. We tested the hypothesis that group testing would lead to greater retention than individual testing. Two instructors, teaching 2 sections of their respective courses, alternated testing formats across the 2 courses. Participants were 147 students from 4 separate undergraduate psychology courses (2 per instructor). Participants taking the group test initially scored higher than those taking the individual test. However, after 3 weeks, with retesting on a subset of questions, there was no significant difference in retention between group versus individual test takers. These findings call into question the value of collaborative testing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aamodt

M. G.

(1983). Academic ability and student preference for discussion group activities. Teaching of Psychology, 10, 117–119.

American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1074.

Anderson

L. W.

Sosniak

L. A.

(Eds.). (1994). Bloom's taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective (Ninety-third yearbook for the National Society for the Study of Education: Part II). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Aronson

Blaney

Stephan

Sikes

Snapp

(1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Balch

W. R.

(1998). Practice versus review exams and final exam performance. Teaching of Psychology, 25, 181–185.

Bleske-Rechek

A. L.

(2001). Obedience, conformity, and social roles: Active learning in a large introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 260–262.

Bloom

B. S.

Englehart

M. B.

Furst

E. J.

Hill

W. H.

Krathwohl

D. R.

(1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.

Bondy

A. S.

(1978). Effects of reviewing multiple-choice tests on specific versus general learning. Teaching of Psychology, 5, 144–146.

Butler

Phillmann

K.-B.

Smart

(2001). Active learning within a lecture: Assessing the impact of short, in-class writing exercises. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 257–259.

10.

Dolinsky

(2001). An active learning approach to teaching statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 55–56.

11.

Halpern

D. F.

(2000, March). Creating cooperative learning environments. APS Observer, 13. Retrieved October 1, 2004, from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/teaching/tips/tips_0300.cfm.

12.

Harton

H. C.

Green

L. R.

Jackson

Latané

(1998). Demonstrating dynamic social impact: Consolidation, clustering, correlation, and (sometimes) the correct answer, Teaching of Psychology, 25, 31–35.

13.

Harton

H. C.

Richardson

D. S.

Barreras

R. E.

Rockloff

M. J.

Latané

(2002). Focused interactive learning: A tool for active class discussion. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 10–15.

14.

Johnson

D. W.

Johnson

R. T.

Smith

K. A.

(1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30, 26–35.

15.

McKeachie

W. J.

(2006). McKeachie's teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (12th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

16.

Perkins

D. V.

Saris

R. N.

(2001). A “jigsaw classroom” technique for undergraduate statistics courses. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 111–113.

17.

Perry

N. W.

Huss

M. T.

McAuliff

B. D.

Galas

J. M.

(1996). An active-learning approach to teaching the undergraduate psychology and law course. Teaching of Psychology, 23, 76–81.

Anticipated Group versus Individual Examinations: A Classroom Comparison

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References