I explain how professors can establish working alliances with students to cultivate a climate conducive to learning. This process involves (a) attending to the emotional bonds that exist in the college classroom, (b) developing shared educational goals and tasks to promote a common sense of purpose, and (c) addressing classroom conflict to repair disruptions in social relationships. I also describe how working alliance theory extends our knowledge and practice of effective teaching.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngeloT. A.CrossK. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
BachelorA. (1995). Clients' perception of the therapeutic alliance: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 323–337.
3.
BensonT. A.CohenA. L.BuskistW. (2005). Rapport: Its relation to student attitudes and behaviors toward teachers and classes. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 237–239.
4.
BillsonJ. M.TiberiusR. G. (1991). Effective social arrangements for teaching and learning. In MengesR. J.SvinickiM. D. (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: No. 45. College teaching: From theory to practice (pp. 87–109). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BordinE. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16, 252–260.
6.
BuskistW.SavilleB. K. (2004). Rapport building: Creating positive emotional contexts for enhancing teaching and learning. In PerlmanB.McCannL. I.McFaddenS. H. (Eds.), Lessons learned: Practical advice for the teaching of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 149–155). Washington, DC: American Psychological Society.
7.
BuskistW.SikorskiJ.BuckleyT.SavilleB. K. (2002). Elements of master teaching. In DavisS. F.BuskistW. (Eds.), The teaching of psychology: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie and Charles L. Brewer (pp. 27–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8.
CastonguayL. G.ConstantinoM. J.HoltforthM. G. (2006). The working alliance: Where are we and where should we go?Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43, 271–279.
9.
ChickeringA. W.GamsonZ. F. (Eds.). (1991). Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
EptingL. K.ZinnT. E.BuskistC.BuskistW. (2004). Student perspectives on the distinction between ideal and typical teachers. Teaching of Psychology, 31, 181–183.
11.
FriedlanderM. L.EscuderoV.HeatheringtonL. (2006). Therapeutic alliances in couple and family therapy: An empirically informed guide to practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12.
HoltonS. A. (1998). Academic mortar to mend the cracks: The Holton model for conflict management. In HoltonS. A. (Ed.), Mending the cracks in the ivory tower: Strategies for conflict management in higher education (pp. 221–238). Bolton, MA: Anker.
13.
HorvathA. O. (2006). The alliance in context: Accomplishments, challenges, and future directions. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43, 258–263.
14.
HorvathA. O.GreenbergL. S. (Eds.). (1994). The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley.
15.
HorvathA. O.SymondsB. D. (1991). Relation between the working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 139–149.
16.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T.SmithK. A. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
17.
LowmanJ. (1995). Mastering the techniques of teaching (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
McCroskeyJ. C.RichmondV. P. (1992). Increasing teacher influence through immediacy. In RichmondV. P.McCroskeyJ. C. (Eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern (pp. 101–119). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19.
McKeachieW. J.SvinickiM. (2006). McKeachie's teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (12th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20.
MeissnerW. W. (2006). The therapeutic alliance: A proteus in disguise. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43, 264–270.
21.
MeyersS. A. (2003). Strategies to prevent and reduce conflict in college classrooms. College Teaching, 51, 94–98.
22.
MeyersS. A.BenderJ.HillE. K.ThomasS. Y. (2006). How do faculty experience and respond to classroom conflict?International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18, 180–187.
23.
NilsonL. B. (1998). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors. Bolton, MA: Anker.
24.
PinsofW. M. (1994). An integrative systems perspective on the therapeutic alliance: Theoretical, clinical, and research implications. In HorvathA. O.GreenbergL. S. (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 173–195). New York: Wiley.
25.
SafranJ. D.MuranJ. C. (1998). The therapeutic alliance in brief psychotherapy: General principles. In SafranJ. D.MuranJ. C. (Eds.), The therapeutic alliance in brief psychotherapy (pp. 217–229). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26.
SafranJ. D.MuranJ. C. (2000). Resolving therapeutic alliance ruptures: Diversity and integration. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 233–243.
27.
SafranJ. D.MuranJ. C. (2006). Has the concept of the therapeutic alliance outlived its usefulness?Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43, 286–291.
28.
TiberiusR. G.BillsonJ. M. (1991). The social context of teaching and learning. In MengesR. J.SvinickiM. D. (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: No. 45. College teaching: From theory to practice (pp. 67–86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29.
TiberiusR. G.FlakE. (1999). Incivility in dyadic teaching and learning. In RichardsonS. M. (Ed.), New directions for teaching and learning: No. 77. Promoting civility: A teaching challenge (pp. 3–12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.
TichenorV.HillC. E. (1989). A comparison of six measures of the working alliance. Psychotherapy, 26, 195–199.
31.
WilsonJ. H. (2006). Predicting student attitudes and grades from perceptions of instructors' attitudes. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 91–95.
32.
WilsonJ. H.TaylorK. W. (2001). Professor immediacy as behaviors associated with liking students. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 136–138.
33.
ZetzelE. R. (1956). Current concepts of transference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 37, 369–375.
