Undergraduates studied the definitions of 16 psychology terms, expecting either a multiple-choice (n = 132) or short-answer (n = 122) test. All students then received the same multiple-choice test, requiring them to recognize the definitions as well as novel examples of the terms. Compared to students expecting a multiple-choice test, those expecting a short-answer test performed similarly on example questions but significantly better on definition questions. Students in these 2 test-expectation conditions also differed in several subjective ratings of their study and test taking. The results suggest that students do not typically study in an optimal way for multiple-choice tests.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalchW. R. (2001). Study tips: How helpful do introductory psychology students find them?Teaching of Psychology, 28, 272–274.
2.
BalchW. R. (2005). Elaborations of introductory psychology terms: Effects on test performance and subjective ratings. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 29–34.
3.
BenjaminL. T.Jr. (2005). Setting course goals: Privileges and responsibilities in a world of ideas. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 146–149.
BloomB. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: McKay.
6.
CarneyR. N.LevinJ. R. (1998). Coming to terms with the keyword method in introductory psychology: A “neuromnemonic” example. Teaching of Psychology, 25, 132–134.
7.
DempsterF. N. (1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist, 43, 627–634.
8.
d'YdewalleG.SwertsA.de CorteE. (1983). Study time and test performance as a function of test expectations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 55–67.
9.
HalonenJ. S. (1995). The critical thinking companion for introductory psychology. New York: Worth.
10.
KumarV. K.RabinskyL.PandeyT. N. (1979). Test mode, test instructions, and retention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4, 211–218.
11.
McKenzieG. R. (1973). Quizzes: Tools or tyrants. Instructional Science, 2, 281–293.
12.
NarlochR.GarbinC. P.TurnageK. D. (2006). Benefits of prelecture quizzes. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 109–112.
13.
PajaresF.MillerM. D. (1997). Mathematics self–efficacy and mathematical problem solving: Implications of using different forms of assessment. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 213–228.
14.
RocklinT. (1992). A multidimensional scaling study of college students' perceptions of test item formats. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 123–136.
15.
SaxG.ColletL. S. (1968). An empirical comparison of the effects of recall and multiple–choice tests on student achievement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 169–173.
16.
VallanceT. R. (1947). A comparison of essay and objective examinations as learning experiences. Journal of Educational Research, 41, 279–288.
17.
WadeC. (1995). Using writing to develop and assess critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 24–28.
18.
WatsonD. L.HagiharaD. K.TenneyA. L. (1999). Skill-building exercises and generalizing psychological concepts to daily life. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 193–195.
19.
WinneP. H.Jamieson-NoelD. (2003). Self–regulating study by objectives for learning: Students' reports compared to a model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 259–276.
